Page 17 of 19
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:11 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Gary Childress
Neitzsche took a dive for Germany. Heidegger was wrong... Nothing good happened in 1930-40 Germany. Heidegger is dead.
warspite1
To be fairto Neitzsche [whoever he is] he wasn't the worst culprit. That Jurgen Klinsmann - he took a dive...or two...or three for Germany. But as he was a hero for Spurs I'll overlook that...unlike Neitzsche. Who did he play for anyway?
The Hammers. The Hammers was the name for which English soccer team?
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:12 pm
by vonRocko
What are you trying to prove? That you are more whacked then slaak? If so, you have succeeded.
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:15 pm
by Darkspire
Is it safe yet? Has he gone for his meds? [:D]
Darkspire
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:26 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Gary Childress
Neitzsche took a dive for Germany. Heidegger was wrong... Nothing good happened in 1930-40 Germany. Heidegger is dead.
warspite1
To be fairto Neitzsche [whoever he is] he wasn't the worst culprit. That Jurgen Klinsmann - he took a dive...or two...or three for Germany. But as he was a hero for Spurs I'll overlook that...unlike Neitzsche. Who did he play for anyway?
The Hammers. The Hammers was the name for which English soccer team?
warspite1
West Ham United - also known as the Irons as they were formed by employees of the old Thames Ironworks & Shipbuilding Company.
So Nietzsche played for the Hammers did he? Wow, never knew that. He must have been rubbish though - West Ham did nothing until the 60's (apart from play - and lose - in the first Wembley FA Cup Final in 1923).
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:37 pm
by Aurelian
What the hell?
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:39 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Aurelian
What the hell?
warspite1
To what are you referring Aurelian? Is it concern for Gary or incredulity that this Niedzsche guy played for rubbish West Ham?
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:53 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: warspite1
warspite1
To be fairto Neitzsche [whoever he is] he wasn't the worst culprit. That Jurgen Klinsmann - he took a dive...or two...or three for Germany. But as he was a hero for Spurs I'll overlook that...unlike Neitzsche. Who did he play for anyway?
The Hammers. The Hammers was the name for which English soccer team?
warspite1
West Ham United - also known as the Irons as they were formed by employees of the old Thames Ironworks & Shipbuilding Company.
So Nietzsche played for the Hammers did he? Wow, never knew that. He must have been rubbish though - West Ham did nothing until the 60's (apart from play - and lose - in the first Wembley FA Cup Final in 1923).
One can be a good player in a bad team. Ian Rush, for example, was a good player that might have had great success in a stronger national team than Wales.
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:54 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: warspite1
You want the women SLAAK is promising? Good luck with that! [;)]
A word of advice, Gary? OK-two words. 1. Sleep! Go and get some. Warspite1 is correct here. 2. Pictures. If you get a woman that SLAAK promises you must post some. Also, make sure that she's a genotypical female too, will ya?
SLAAK posts some curiously masculine types from time to time.
warspite1
Post #9 of the "Pirates Seeks Amazon Booty" thread is the perfect example of SLAAK's rather peculiar taste
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:55 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
The Hammers. The Hammers was the name for which English soccer team?
warspite1
West Ham United - also known as the Irons as they were formed by employees of the old Thames Ironworks & Shipbuilding Company.
So Nietzsche played for the Hammers did he? Wow, never knew that. He must have been rubbish though - West Ham did nothing until the 60's (apart from play - and lose - in the first Wembley FA Cup Final in 1923).
One can be a good player in a bad team. Ian Rush, for example, was a good player that might have had great success in a stronger national team than Wales.
warspite1
You are right as always Mr O [&o]
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 1:46 pm
by Aurelian
ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Aurelian
What the hell?
warspite1
To what are you referring Aurelian? Is it concern for Gary or incredulity that this Niedzsche guy played for rubbish West Ham?
Gary going postal. Don't know what started it.
Oh, this Niedzsche guy too.
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:37 pm
by SLAAKMAN
NEVER FEAR, SLAAK IS HERE.
[:'(]
EZEKIEL 10 Then I looked, and behold, xon the expanse that was over the heads of the cherubim there appeared above them something ylike a sapphire,1 in appearance like a throne. 2 And he said to zthe man clothed in linen, “Go in among athe whirling wheels underneath the cherubim. Fill your hands with bburning coals from between the cherubim, and cscatter them over the city.”
And he went in dbefore my eyes. 3 Now the cherubim were standing eon the south side of the house, when the man went in, and fa cloud filled gthe inner court. 4 And hthe glory of the Lord iwent up from the cherub to the threshold of the house, and the house fwas filled with the cloud, and the court was filled with jthe brightness of the glory of the Lord. 5 And kthe sound of the wings of the cherubim was heard as far as the outer court, klike the voice of God Almighty when he speaks.
6 And when he commanded lthe man clothed in linen, m“Take fire from between nthe whirling wheels, from between the cherubim,” he went in and stood beside a wheel. 7 And a cherub stretched out his hand from between the cherubim to the fire that was between the cherubim, and took some of it and put it into the hands of the man clothed in linen, who took it and went out. 8 The cherubim appeared to have othe form of a human hand under their wings.
9 pAnd I looked, and behold, there were four wheels beside the cherubim, one beside each cherub, and qthe appearance of the wheels was rlike sparkling sberyl. 10 And as for their appearance, the four had the same likeness, as if a wheel were within a wheel. 11 tWhen they went, they went in any of their four directions2 uwithout turning as they went, vbut in whatever direction the front wheel3 faced, the others followed without turning as they went. 12 wAnd their whole body, their rims, and their spokes, their wings,4 and the wheels were full of eyes all around—the wheels that the four of them had. 13 As for the wheels, they were called in my hearing n“the whirling wheels.” 14 xAnd every one had four faces: ythe first face was the face of the cherub, and the second face was za human face, and the third the face of a lion, and the fourth the face of an eagle.
15 aAnd the cherubim mounted up. These were bthe living creatures that I saw by cthe Chebar canal. 16 dAnd when the cherubim went, the wheels went beside them. And dwhen the cherubim lifted up their wings to mount up from the earth, the wheels did not turn from beside them. 17 eWhen they stood still, these stood still, and when they mounted up, these mounted up with them, for the spirit of the living creatures5 was in them.
18 fThen gthe glory of the Lord went out from the threshold of the house, and stood over the cherubim. 19 hAnd the cherubim lifted up their wings and mounted up from the earth ibefore my eyes as they went out, with the wheels beside them. And they stood at the entrance of the jeast gate of the house of the Lord, and kthe glory of the God of Israel was over them.
20 lThese were the living creatures that I saw munderneath the God of Israel by nthe Chebar canal; and I knew that they were cherubim. 21 oEach had four faces, and each four wings, and underneath their wings pthe likeness of human hands. 22 qAnd as for the likeness of their faces, they were the same faces whose appearance I had seen by the Chebar canal. rEach one of them went straight forward.
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:51 pm
by vonRocko
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:55 pm
by Boomer78
123RF... is like a year or somethin'?
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:12 pm
by Dane49
This an interesting thread in a very strange sort of way.
Can't believe you guys get this worked up over Slaaks postings.
I wonder sometimes if you guys actually believe what He writes but find it to disturbing to accept because it scares the Hell out of you and you don't like being scared.
I find his postings entertaining,it's like watching the SciFi channel.
I don't believe much if anything that Slaak writes,but it still poses some interesting and disturbing questions.
Slaak may go a little overboard at times,but I don't think it warrants breaking out the pitchforks and torches and initiating a witch hunt.
People like that scare me more than the witch.
One thing for certain,911 was a very fantastic event and the events that followed are as equally fantastic.
The US has changed considerably because of this event and the country we once knew is no longer the same because of it and that to me is the undeniable disturbing truth.
Whether or not Slaak is right about 911 is irrelevant to me.
I'm more concerned with regaining our pre 911 eminence as the one country that most of the world respected and wanted to be like before 911.
Those days are most likely gone forever and nothing more than wishful thinking on my part and I doubt I'll see them again in my life time.
Only time will prove if Slaak is right or a crackpot.
I truelly hope Slaak is wrong,but I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt till He can be definately proved wrong.Anyone here able to see into the future?
Wishful thinking on my part is no basis right now for me judge him.
I'm still wary of his findings but I also have doubts of my own that make it hard for me to dismiss his thoughts and ideas at the drop of a hat.
Though I don't think there is a grand conspiracy afoot.Something is definately wrong in this country and denying this isn't going to make it go away.
Individually we are all going to have to come to our own conclusions and live with them.
For the sake of the country and the world I hope Slaak is way off base here and indulging in nothing more than whimsical fantasy.From my perspective I don't know enough to indulge in that kind of thinking and know even less about how to prove or disprove it.
My gut instinct tells me everything is not all coincidence though,and I'm keeping my eyes wide open till I feel confortable enough to close them again!
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:23 pm
by SLAAKMAN
Dane49
I can only wish the data accumulated was false. The bad news is that Revelation 13 is in full swing. The Good News however is that Revelation 22 is on the way! Selah!!! [:D]
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:28 pm
by danlongman
Thanks for the vigorously insulting PM Slaak.
You are a piece of work and a vile one too.
Seeya
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:52 pm
by SLAAKMAN
Hows your own bitter vile taste? Nasty aint it? Ironic too considering you have to go out of your way to defend starfugly.
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:59 pm
by danlongman
You could be twins some days. You got away with that spurious quote ever since they made it up about ten or fifteen years ago.
I have a cat litter box to clean.
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:10 pm
by SLAAKMAN
You could be twins some days. You got away with that spurious quote ever since they made it up about ten or fifteen years ago.
I have a cat litter box to clean.
Prove it. You have no credibility whatsoever.
RE: What gives SLAAK
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:36 pm
by danlongman
Credibility. You know this word? This is bordering on the bizarre. Like I said a piece of work. If you were pushing anything
credible YOU would give IT a bad name. Of course we would be talking about self awareness then wouldn't we?
