Page 17 of 36
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 5:57 pm
by AllenK
Yep, it can go there.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 6:00 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Allied 7, Axis 5. How they are not able to find each others in that weather?
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 6:08 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
2 ground strikes. One in Belgium, CW is trying to cover Antwerp and another in Manchuria.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 6:08 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
USSR had high hopes after seeing how CW and France are doing in west...

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 12:07 am
by Jagdtiger14
I would get the French ARM out of there, replace with cheap units plus the Inf div.
Are you guys playing with Defensive Shore Bombardment?...if so I would have used CW units in Antwerp. Maybe the French fleet can get up there?
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:52 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
Thank you for your comment. We don't have optional rule defensive shore bombardment. I insisted not to take it
My plan is to take Arm out asap. Tanks belong to clear. It was the only French unit possible to reach Antwerp first impulse and now it is disorganized. CW will take care of coastal hex, that is their mission in mainland.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:25 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
CW rails AA gun to same hex with HQ in France. USSR rails MIL from Leningrad to Manchuria, same hex with Timoshenko.
USSR 1st and 3rd cavalry are flanking Japanese forces in Manchuria. CW makes room in Denmark for MIL. Nationalist Chinese move their stack in same area where communists are closing Japanese.
CW debarks MIL to Denmark.
USSR IL-4 and TB-3 are rebased to east.
Wavell reorganizes 2 CP in Egypt. Georges reorganizes Arm and Potez 631 in France.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:29 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Manchuria after impulse 6

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:31 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Northern China

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:05 pm
by AllenK
M/A 1940 Axis 7.
With a weather roll of 5, the fine weather vanishes and probably brings about a soggy lull in the proceedings.
No DoW
Germany Air, Italy & Japan Land.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:30 pm
by AllenK
The German Nav initiates searching in the Italian Coast but gets put off by the rain (7). The Allies vaguely hear aircraft engines but cannot locate the source (5).
Mukden Militia rails back to Mukden from Hangchow.
Manchuria after Japanese movement.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:33 pm
by AllenK
The rest of North and Central China.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:39 pm
by AllenK
The Italians cross the Egyptian border.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:46 pm
by AllenK
The Germans rebase a couple of Ftr's nearer Antwerp.
von Rundstedt reorganises a Mot, a Stuka and a Ju-88.
A rain affected impulse ends but, on a 6, the turn doesn't.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 3:54 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
M/A 1940 Allied 9
No DoW.
USSR and CW combined, China and France land, US pass.
USSR sends subs to seas in east. One goes to China Sea and another one to Japanese Coast. CW tries to sneak out from Easter Mediterranean with Trans and 5 other ships. Eagle Eye Italians roll 2 and CW decides to fight trough. Allied roll 1. I believe Italy chooses naval air combat?

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 4:25 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
I don't think there is any other option, so I move on. RN AA gunners do their job and scares Italian planes away. Next search rolls: Axis 3, Allied 7. No combat and CW ships sails to Red Sea box 0.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 4:51 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
CW plays with risk and sends 2 CP to Eastern Mediterranean with no escorts.
5 sea areas (Italy probably wants to sink CW CP's in Eastern Med) where naval combat is possible. USSR is trying to hunt CP's down in east and CW is trying to sink CP in Italian Coast. CW is not eager to fight in Western Med.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 4:59 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Japanese Coast: Allied 2, Axis 9 -> no combat. Damn high waves...
China Sea: Allied 8, axis 8 -> no combat.
Italian Coast: Allied 4, Axis 5 -> no combat.
And Italy wants to search in Eastern Med? CW has 2 CP, no other ships or planes.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 5:04 pm
by AllenK
Yes please. CP's are generally always worth a shot, especially if unescorted.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 5:09 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Italy is trying to sink CP's in Eastern Med: Axis 8, Allied 7 -> no combat.
That was exiting, but not as exiting if we would have found each others ships... With these rolls I should have transported my Spitfire trough Mediterranean to Egypt, not take detour beyond Cape Town.