RE: Dancing with the Stars
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:50 pm
I have to admit. This Scenario 2 in AE is seriously more challenging for the Allies.
What's your Strategy?
https://forums.matrixgames.com:443/
Um...yes? [&:] This comes as a surprise-how giving the Japs several divisions and a bunch of other goodies would make the game more challenging?ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
I have to admit. This Scenario 2 in AE is seriously more challenging for the Allies.
ORIGINAL: sprior
As far as I'm concerned this whole game pivots on capturing the Marianas so we can put the Japanese homeland in B29 range. To do that we have to take the Marshalls.
After the Marianas we can do the Palau and Peleliu from Guam and use them to jump into the PI. Everything we're doing now should be aimed at chewing up JJs forces to make the above easier.
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: sprior
As far as I'm concerned this whole game pivots on capturing the Marianas so we can put the Japanese homeland in B29 range. To do that we have to take the Marshalls.
After the Marianas we can do the Palau and Peleliu from Guam and use them to jump into the PI. Everything we're doing now should be aimed at chewing up JJs forces to make the above easier.
Several other players have testified that it is harder to strat bomb JJ's cities with B-29s in this game versus IRL. There seems to be some dissatisfaction re: B-29's ability to keep up the fight and dish out the hurt in the face of high maintenance requirements, high OPS losses and low replacement numbers.
Tinian may not be the lynchpin you expect....
Different focus, I'm afraid-my Argletonian colleague...[:-]ORIGINAL: witpqs
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: sprior
As far as I'm concerned this whole game pivots on capturing the Marianas so we can put the Japanese homeland in B29 range. To do that we have to take the Marshalls.
After the Marianas we can do the Palau and Peleliu from Guam and use them to jump into the PI. Everything we're doing now should be aimed at chewing up JJs forces to make the above easier.
Several other players have testified that it is harder to strat bomb JJ's cities with B-29s in this game versus IRL. There seems to be some dissatisfaction re: B-29's ability to keep up the fight and dish out the hurt in the face of high maintenance requirements, high OPS losses and low replacement numbers.
Tinian may not be the lynchpin you expect....
And yet there's an effort underway in another thread to tone down Allied 4EB's... [8|]
You mean increasing their Service Rating above the current 4 would not impact those things? [:(]ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Different focus, I'm afraid-my Argletonian colleague...[:-]ORIGINAL: witpqs
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Several other players have testified that it is harder to strat bomb JJ's cities with B-29s in this game versus IRL. There seems to be some dissatisfaction re: B-29's ability to keep up the fight and dish out the hurt in the face of high maintenance requirements, high OPS losses and low replacement numbers.
Tinian may not be the lynchpin you expect....
And yet there's an effort underway in another thread to tone down Allied 4EB's... [8|]
ORIGINAL: witpqs
You mean increasing their Service Rating above the current 4 would not impact those things? [:(]ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Different focus, I'm afraid-my Argletonian colleague...[:-]ORIGINAL: witpqs
And yet there's an effort underway in another thread to tone down Allied 4EB's... [8|]
No. What I meant was that the argument in the other thread involves multiple seemingly parallel discussions about all the things wrong with heavy bombers. The OP originally opined that perhaps accuracy of defensive firepower from Allied 4EBs may be a bit high. He's probably right. He was quickly deluged with the usual litany of how this is the 'only good weapons platform for the Allies' and blah de blah.ORIGINAL: witpqs
You mean increasing their Service Rating above the current 4 would not impact those things? [:(]ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Different focus, I'm afraid-my Argletonian colleague...[:-]ORIGINAL: witpqs
And yet there's an effort underway in another thread to tone down Allied 4EB's... [8|]
Even with drop tanks?ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
By ra way, the idea of using P-39's to sweep over Darwin from Wyndham wont work...too far. Maybe we can scrounge up some P-38's from an authroized reseller.
Is that snow on the ground? It looks like the middle of a desert! What's the elevation (a big hill around my way is ......oh........400m above sea level [:D] )ORIGINAL: witpqs
One of my neighbors has this sign at the end of his driveway:
ORIGINAL: Itdepends
Is that snow on the ground? It looks like the middle of a desert! What's the elevation (a big hill around my way is ......oh........400m above sea level [:D] )
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
After all, why taint this thread with such non-sequitors, half-baked opinions, hearsay, pointless banter and questionable internet hygeine?...
Well I was. For a minute. Only. It's hard for me to stay on task longer than one paragraph. [:D]ORIGINAL: witpqs
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
After all, why taint this thread with such non-sequitors, half-baked opinions, hearsay, pointless banter and questionable internet hygeine?...
[:D] Oh golly, for a minute there I thought you were serious! [:D] [;)] [:'(]
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
To be fair, some of the finest estates in the US have a rusty chain across the gravel driveway to keep out Jehova's Witnesses and Federal Revenue Agents.ORIGINAL: witpqs
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
[:D] And the architecture...is it by any chance neuveau tar paper shack?
[:D] It looks like they re-used a realtor's sign. The post is for a chain that they can put across the driveway. Personally I would have Rustoleum'ed the post and spray painted the sign before putting on the letters, but then I have no artistic side.
