Page 18 of 28

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:54 pm
by Nikademus
ORIGINAL: Tiornu

I agree with rating Yamato as the Champ of the Brawl, though I rate Iowa higher overall. With her range and speed, she's a better bet on getting to the brawl in the first place.

and for less cost at the fuel pump. [:D]



RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:32 am
by Iridium
ORIGINAL: Nikademus

ORIGINAL: Tiornu

I agree with rating Yamato as the Champ of the Brawl, though I rate Iowa higher overall. With her range and speed, she's a better bet on getting to the brawl in the first place.

and for less cost at the fuel pump. [:D]


Clearly the Yamato is the "Caddy" one only takes out on Sundays, only in good weather of course.

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:44 am
by Terminus
ORIGINAL: Hornblower

Baltimore's, Fletchers, Essex..

Gato/Balao/Tench... Oh, my![:D]

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:00 am
by Dili
Iowa was very vulnerable if hit near A-turret amno depot.

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:57 am
by Terminus
What?

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:13 am
by John Lansford
Yamato's fire control was suspect; both the Iowa's and SoDaks had radar guided fire control.  The SoDak or Iowa could control the distance of engagement and keep getting hits on Yamato, who probably couldn't hit the USN ships often enough to make a difference.  I've read that the Iowa had better underwater protection than the SoDaks, but just barely, and the long narrow bow was always a damage control concern since it had no depth at all in the event of a torpedo or penetrating large shell hit.
 
 

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:24 am
by Kadrin
Best Designed?

CV: Essexs or Midways
BB: Iowas
CA: Baltimores
CL: Brooklyns or Clevelands
DD: Fletchers

You did say designed.

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:37 am
by AW1Steve
The USN's AOG. And they had a really mean garbage scow too! 2Nd to none! [:D]

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:53 pm
by mdiehl
With her range and speed, she's a better bet on getting to the brawl in the first place.


And with here targeting systems, she's got the drop on Yamato at any range and the guns to put her out straight away.

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:35 pm
by Hornblower
not to toss gas on the fire, but what the heck:  I don't believe that the vaunted 18.1” rifles of the Yamato were even able to score a single hit on a 10,000 Ton  18 knot CVE off Samar.  That doesn’t bode well for her gunnery department / officer.   Now a savvy Poster will come back with “Well the Iowa didn’t hit anything with her 16” rifles off of Truk in ’44.”  However I maintain there is a slight difference in hitting a 10,000 ton 18 knot CVE and a 36knt 2,000 ton DD.
 
At the Battle of Surigao Strait the We-Vee hit the Yamashiro at 23,000 yards with her first Salvo.  Her Mark 8 fire control had gained a firing solution at 30,000 yards – same set up the fast BB’s had.  So one could reasonably infer that the Yamato would be under fire from 30,000 yards in ..

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:35 pm
by Dili
What?
In a torpedo hit. Iowa hull was very "squeezed" at A-Turret frame.

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:20 pm
by John Lansford
That's why I give the nod in protection to the SoDaks rather than the Iowas.  The latter class had slightly thicker armor in some locations, but the hull was so slender forward that it was essentially unprotected, not a problem on the SoDaks.  The forward 16" barbette and magazine had very little between it and the outer hull thanks to that narrow hull structure.

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 6:20 pm
by AW1Steve
What , no one is going to disagree with my AOG or garbage scow nomination? I'm crushed. [:D]

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 6:51 pm
by Titi
ORIGINAL: Hornblower

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

ORIGINAL: witpqs




Well of course you are being ridiculous. A sufficient number of mass-produced Shermans, on the other hand...
Shermans aren't ships! You need to stay on the subject!!! [:-] [:'(]

Yes i do believe that rtrapasso is correct on that point...

I disagree.
Show me the Bismarck being more versatile than a Sherman. [:D]

Image

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:45 pm
by Anthropoid
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

What , no one is going to disagree with my AOG or garbage scow nomination? I'm crushed. [:D]

Don't take it personal Steve. Didja see how everybody just totally ignored my bit about Liberty ships and early model U-boats?

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:46 pm
by AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Anthropoid

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

What , no one is going to disagree with my AOG or garbage scow nomination? I'm crushed. [:D]

Don't take it personal Steve. Didja see how everybody just totally ignored my bit about Liberty ships and early model U-boats?

I think I'll raise the ante......a mark 7 inflatable life boat! There, beat that guys! [:D]

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:52 pm
by Anthropoid
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

What , no one is going to disagree with my AOG or garbage scow nomination? I'm crushed. [:D]

Don't take it personal Steve. Didja see how everybody just totally ignored my bit about Liberty ships and early model U-boats?

I think I'll raise the ante......a mark 7 inflatable life boat! There, beat that guys! [:D]

I find it ironic that guys are arguing that designs that never actually seem to have _DONE_ anything (e.g., as somebody noted above Yamato didn't sink nuthin', Iowa didn't sink nuthin') are "best designs."

Now Mark 7 inflatable rafts on the other hand, those must have "DONE" lots of things in the war. Remember that scene in "A Bridge to Far" . . . "Hail Mary! Full of Grace! . . . Hail Mary! Full of Grace!"

Now THAT is good design: cheap, efficient, gets the job done.

What is the point of some gigantor hunk of iron with hugiferous big frickin' guns that go !BOOM! but which are so big and scary the enemy runs away any time they are nearby (else dog piles them in any attack) and consequently all they really do is act as a magnet/repulsor of enemy, not actually a destructor of enemy!?! I don't get it!? Ever since Jutland, the complete impracticality of big arse boats with big arse guns was shown quite clearly wasn't it!? [:D]

Hail the Liberty ships and the rubber dinghies! Best Designs!
<hoping that is sufficiently provocative to get the real naval theorists roused up into some interesting soliloquies>

ADDIT: *Pssst* BTW, what's an "AOG?"

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:42 pm
by AW1Steve
Small gasoline tanker. Very small. [:)]

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:49 pm
by Barb
Well, what about LVTs?
I would rate LST as best designed ship. Without them ...

RE: Best Designed Ship of WWII

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:50 pm
by AW1Steve
LST's? Best targets ever made! [:D]