Page 18 of 44
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 2:49 pm
by larryfulkerson
TF 349 is a group of TK's carrying fuel to Darwin and if and when it lands there it will more than double the fuel Darwin has right now.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:00 pm
by larryfulkerson
Here's the Pickerel........it's a broken sub on it's way to Singapore. I've got a lot of broken subs and I've been sending them all to Singers.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:33 pm
by larryfulkerson
That enemy TF we picked up yesterday is still there and it is still headed east. I'm putting a Catalina unit on searching for it
just to keep an eye on it and to track where it's going. I can't imagine the Japs trying to invade the west coast this early in the game
but I guess that's possible. I've got a DD at Midway but she isn't a match for what's out there, probably. Maybe the Cat's will bring us
some better recon in the days ahead.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:41 pm
by larryfulkerson
The Argonaut is on station........now she just needs some unescorted ship traffic. She may have to loiter there for at least a week to see
anything. I'm going to leave her there for as long as the torpedoes last. A Jap ship could come along any day now.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:37 pm
by larryfulkerson
I picked up some radio transmissions from Takao and I'm not sure what to believe from it. Supposedly there's a CVL parked there. Or it
might not be. I donno.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:24 pm
by larryfulkerson
I ended the turn again and here's some fresh combat results:
The Japs are still pumping men ashore at Rabaul:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:29 pm
by larryfulkerson
And there was a small victory at Kuching:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:34 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then KXV gets a hit on an AK:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:36 pm
by larryfulkerson
Evidently I need more planes at Wake:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:41 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then the B-17 raid on Bubble Drop. No losses but probably no damage either.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:52 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then there was an attack on Clark Field:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:56 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then the Japs attacked Georgetown:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:59 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then there was an attack on shipping at Singapore:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:03 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then there was an aerial strike on Rabaul:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:09 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then the Japs captured Alor Star:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:12 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then a bunch of stuff happened in China, which I'm skipping, and then the Japs and I both did bombardment attacks at Rabaul:
EDIT: I just now noticed that the AI has put the AF unit in with the invaders rather than in a separate trip. I can't imagine me doing that.
Putting the AF dudes at risk like that is bound to get some of them hurt. And they ( the AF dudes ) are relatively rare so I'm not sure
that's a good idea.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:16 pm
by moore4807
Nice AAR -
Very nice SCTF action for you this early. The A.I. is not very good, like we commented on in the e-mails.
I'd be cautious about putting more planes on Wake, just make sure there are enough AF engineers and supply to keep your fighters flying since he has no way to escort the bombers. Attrition works!
Slept most of yesterday and was up today 3-6am & got TommyG's turn done and out the door. I feel better but not good - yet.
Also I'm waiting on a turn from you. . . [;)][;)][;)]
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:24 pm
by larryfulkerson
ORIGINAL: moore4807
Nice AAR -
Why thank you very much. I'm surprised to see you posting so early. Last I heard you were feeling under the weather and were
going back to bed. Good to hear that you're doing better.
ORIGINAL: moore4807
Very nice SCTF action for you this early. The A.I. is not very good, like we commented on in the e-mails.
Yeah, you're right about that. I'm thinking that I might have some B-17's hitting the home islands in about a year and a half at this
rate. Not much of a challenge so far. But I'm not complaining.
ORIGINAL: moore4807
I'd be cautious about putting more planes on Wake, just make sure there are enough AF engineers and supply to keep your fighters flying since he has no way to escort the bombers. Attrition works!
AF DUDES and supply, roger that. Working on it already.
ORIGINAL: moore4807
Slept most of yesterday and was up today 3-6am & got TommyG's turn done and out the door. I feel better but not good - yet.
Well, look at the bright side: you're still on the right side of the grass.
ORIGINAL: moore4807
Also I'm waiting on a turn from you.
I emailed my moves at 09:18 Tucson Az time this morning and then launched into more publishing of AAR stuff here without a
significant lapse in time. Lemme know if my email moushed again. I can always re-send.
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:27 pm
by moore4807
ORIGINAL: moore4807
Slept most of yesterday and was up today 3-6am & got TommyG's turn done and out the door. I feel better but not good - yet.
Well, look at the bright side: you're still on the right side of the grass.
Well THAT is true...LOL
ORIGINAL: moore4807
Also I'm waiting on a turn from you.
I emailed my moves at 09:18 Tucson Az time this morning and then launched into more publishing of AAR stuff here without a
significant lapse in time. Lemme know if my email moushed again. I can always re-send.
[/quote]
Disregard last, just got it @ 12:29pm
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:30 pm
by larryfulkerson
Sent again just now............10:30 tucson time.
EDIT: Ah HA. So.......it's two hours difference from Jim's house to mine. Sounds like New Jersey.