RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:00 am
Here's the moves in round 1 of turn 3:
Page 19 of 24
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:51 am
Here's the front lines after movement in R1 of T4:
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:24 am
ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
So um........hey you guys. Colonel Klink twisted my arm and convinced me to playtest his Kharkov '43 scenario instead of continuing w/ this AAR.
I'm satisfied, so far, w/ the Soviet performance in that they are sufficiently far forward that the Axis will take longer to obtain their goals if they obtain
them at all. The Soviet playthrough will have to be done at some future date.
LOL so that's what happened. Opened up this AAR of yours and I couldn't believe my eyes, last report you were putting up a stiff defense as Soviets and all of a sudden you are breaking those lines as if no one's there... [&:]
A restart with Kharkov '43 [&o]
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:15 am
It's still being tweaked, Kh'43 that is; but drop me a line and I send it to you. If you wish, i can try an Elmer vs Elmer AAR as well, with local interference of me, so to sayORIGINAL: Josh
ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
So um........hey you guys. Colonel Klink twisted my arm and convinced me to playtest his Kharkov '43 scenario instead of continuing w/ this AAR.
I'm satisfied, so far, w/ the Soviet performance in that they are sufficiently far forward that the Axis will take longer to obtain their goals if they obtain
them at all. The Soviet playthrough will have to be done at some future date.
LOL so that's what happened. Opened up this AAR of yours and I couldn't believe my eyes, last report you were putting up a stiff defense as Soviets and all of a sudden you are breaking those lines as if no one's there... [&:]
A restart with Kharkov '43 [&o]
Klink, Oberst
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:09 pm
Sorry for the confusion dudes. But you guys can keep up I'm pretty sure.ORIGINAL: JoshORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
So um........hey you guys. Colonel Klink twisted my arm and convinced me to playtest his Kharkov '43 scenario instead of continuing w/ this AAR.
I'm satisfied, so far, w/ the Soviet performance in that they are sufficiently far forward that the Axis will take longer to obtain their goals if they obtain them at all. The Soviet playthrough will have to be done at some future date.
LOL so that's what happened. Opened up this AAR of yours and I couldn't believe my eyes, last report you were putting up a stiff defense as Soviets and all of a sudden you are breaking those lines as if no one's there... [&:]
A restart with Kharkov '43 [&o]
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:13 pm
Here's the front lines as of round 2 of turn 4:
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:27 pm
Here's what the supply level looks like in the Riga area:
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:14 pm
Smolensk is one of the objectives and if and when I capture it the Soviet production will decrease by 10%. I'm sneaking up on it.
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:02 pm
Kiev is also an objective and Axis capture of it causes Soviet production to reduce by 10%. I'm sneaking up on it too. I'm having a blast
with this game you guys.
with this game you guys.
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:26 pm
Here's my moves for T5 round 1:
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 2:39 am
Here's my moves for round 1 T6:
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:56 am
Here's what Kiev looks like in T7:
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 10:59 am
This is the front lines at the beginning of round 2 of T7:
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 11:12 am
Army Group North is doing fine supplywise. As winter descends the supply level will dip however.
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 11:01 pm
I'm creaping forward slowly but surely. I'll own Smolensk shortly.
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 11:03 pm
In the Kiev area the Soviet front lines collapsed and it's a free-for-all.
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 11:09 pm
Here's the Odessa area now-a-days. I'm observing a FITE rule about Axis minors not stacking together and not participating in
attacks together etc. It makes the game more realistic,.
attacks together etc. It makes the game more realistic,.
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 11:12 pm
This is the front lines in T8 just after the movement in round 1 but before the first combat phase.
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 11:28 pm
I'm mildly worried about that wide open area to the east ( yellow circle ). I don't have anything much defending that stretch of real estate.
I've been looking around for someone to stick in there but most of the available units are too far away. I guess I'll have to move
somebody over there and be quick about it.
I've been looking around for someone to stick in there but most of the available units are too far away. I guess I'll have to move
somebody over there and be quick about it.
RE: Barbarosa 41 revised
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:04 am
Here's my moves for T9:
