Page 182 of 396

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:51 pm
by Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

From that MSN article about revised projections (linked again: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/key-c ... li=BBnb7Kz):

"The April 5 update predicts the need for 140,823 total hospital beds and 29,210 ICU beds at the peak of the outbreak. Those numbers are down 121,269 and 10,517, respectively." [emphasis added]

Wow.
That model anticipates extension of social discipline through AUGUST [X(]


Still, it's good news in the short run

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:54 pm
by Zorch
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

From that MSN article about revised projections (linked again: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/key-c ... li=BBnb7Kz):

"The April 5 update predicts the need for 140,823 total hospital beds and 29,210 ICU beds at the peak of the outbreak. Those numbers are down 121,269 and 10,517, respectively." [emphasis added]

Wow.
That model anticipates extension of social discipline through AUGUST [X(]
...
By August every member of this forum will be stark raving mad. Except me. [:D]

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:57 pm
by durnedwolf
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

From that MSN article about revised projections (linked again: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/key-c ... li=BBnb7Kz):

"The April 5 update predicts the need for 140,823 total hospital beds and 29,210 ICU beds at the peak of the outbreak. Those numbers are down 121,269 and 10,517, respectively." [emphasis added]

Wow.
That model anticipates extension of social discipline through AUGUST [X(]


Still, it's good news in the short run


Mmmmmm Hmmmm.
My college (we have campuses from Edwards up to Mammoth Lakes) is also preparing for this lockdown to be extended into July/August. In California, the governor's lockdown is basically staying at home until further notice.


RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:59 pm
by Canoerebel
Wow, what a tough challenge.

How do you handle people when they see few or no cases in their area but there's a need to maintain countermeasures playing against a need to return to work?

Perceptions in major cities will definitely be different than Goosebump, Tennessee, or Lander, Wyoming.

Hopefully that doesn't become an issue. Maybe summertime heat and humidity have an impact. Perhaps quick detection and containment work with small numbers (as in Korea). Perhaps advances in medicine kick in.

In a state like Tennessee, for instance, where there are a projected 587 deaths, the vast majority of which presumably are older folks and/or folks with co-morbidity issues, can you keep the 15 to 50 (or 75) age group at home?

Tough challenges.

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:00 pm
by durnedwolf

I'm gunna stop using deodorant as a deterrent towards those that would attempt to invade my social distancing space. I think this should work effectively against those approaching from down-wind... [:D]

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:02 pm
by Lokasenna
ORIGINAL: obvert
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake




It's DC. Nobody knows what a percentage is

[8|]

If only 15% of people are infected, that's nowhere near close enough for herd immunity... which means that more than 15% of people will become infected unless the virus is eradicated. Fat chance of that.

Currently no country in the world has a 15% infection rate that we know of, and if they had it would be beyond catastrophic. The US currently is at a 0.11% infection rate according to tests taken. Spain is the highest for large countries (1 million plus) at 0.30% of it's total population, according to tests. Even using some experts estimates of a 10x known infection rate, that is considerably lower than 15%!!

I hope that's a not so dumb headline of the day in the other direction, and he's wildly overestimating so people take this seriously, and that such a high rate doesn't end up happening.

DC's mayor is actually a she, currently.

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

Key Coronavirus Model Now Predicts Many Fewer U.S. Deaths
2 hrs ago
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/key-c ... li=BBnb7Kz

"A Sunday update of a prominent COVID-19 forecasting model suggests that fewer lives will be lost during the first wave of the coronavirus outbreak than previously thought."

"The University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) now predicts that 81,766 people will die of COVID-19 in the U.S. through early August. When the model was last updated, on April 2, it predicted 11,765 deaths more deaths, for a total of 93,531."

"The April 5 update predicts the need for 140,823 total hospital beds and 29,210 ICU beds at the peak of the outbreak. Those numbers are down 121,269 and 10,517, respectively."

"The model also revised downward the prediction for the number of ventilators needed at the height of the outbreak. It now predicts the need for 18,992 ventilators, down from 31,782."

"Crucially, it also assumes the continuation of social distancing until early August, well beyond the April 30 guidelines currently set forth by the White House."

I also just read this quoted part as part of another story. What really stuck out to me was the bolded part.

Really highlights how businesses are pitting themselves against overall public health. I sympathize - it's an impossible position. Hopefully we get a bit more guidance from the federal level... Now, if only Congress hadn't decided to go on vacation until April 20 as scheduled... Although I understand that business as usual for them would have hundreds of people in close proximity, there's a leadership vacuum right now. Dr. Fauci can't fill it all. Maybe they could've found a way to conduct at least some business while also practicing social distancing.

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:05 pm
by Canoerebel
A wild guess on my part: Once the experts (medical professionals, mainly) estimated that there were enough bed and equipment to handle needs for any local outbreaks, we'd see a return to work.

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:08 pm
by Lokasenna
ORIGINAL: durnedwolf

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

From that MSN article about revised projections (linked again: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/key-c ... li=BBnb7Kz):

"The April 5 update predicts the need for 140,823 total hospital beds and 29,210 ICU beds at the peak of the outbreak. Those numbers are down 121,269 and 10,517, respectively." [emphasis added]

Wow.
That model anticipates extension of social discipline through AUGUST [X(]


Still, it's good news in the short run


Mmmmmm Hmmmm.
My college (we have campuses from Edwards up to Mammoth Lakes) is also preparing for this lockdown to be extended into July/August. In California, the governor's lockdown is basically staying at home until further notice.


Maryland's is indefinite as well.

In Virginia, their current end date on their order is June 10.

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:09 pm
by Lokasenna
ORIGINAL: durnedwolf


I'm gunna stop using deodorant as a deterrent towards those that would attempt to invade my social distancing space. I think this should work effectively against those approaching from down-wind... [:D]

Also a good excuse to conserve water usage and cut back on showering [:D]

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:10 pm
by durnedwolf
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

A wild guess on my part: Once the experts (medical professionals, mainly) estimated that there were enough bed and equipment to handle needs for any local outbreaks, we'd see a return to work.

That makes sense. At the end of the day, I think most folks hope for some normalcy to return - theatres, restraints, sports games, etc.

I but Amazon is doing very good business right now...


RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:11 pm
by Zorch
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

ORIGINAL: durnedwolf


I'm gunna stop using deodorant as a deterrent towards those that would attempt to invade my social distancing space. I think this should work effectively against those approaching from down-wind... [:D]

Also a good excuse to conserve water usage and cut back on showering [:D]
Careful, you might be in violation of the Geneva Convention rules on chemical warfare.

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:12 pm
by Lokasenna
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

USSAmerica, that is why I did this:
Lokasenna

This user is on your "block" list and the message has been blocked.
Click here to unblock this user and view this post.

Joe

Your loss. I do occasionally post useful information that nobody else has posted before, and sometimes repeat useful information that I didn't (yet) notice somebody else posting.

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:13 pm
by durnedwolf
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

ORIGINAL: durnedwolf


I'm gunna stop using deodorant as a deterrent towards those that would attempt to invade my social distancing space. I think this should work effectively against those approaching from down-wind... [:D]

Also a good excuse to conserve water usage and cut back on showering [:D]

right? [:D]

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:34 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: durnedwolf


I'm gunna stop using deodorant as a deterrent towards those that would attempt to invade my social distancing space. I think this should work effectively against those approaching from down-wind... [:D]

Eat lots of garlic as well. It will also help keep the blood sucking females away. [;)]

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:36 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: durnedwolf

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

A wild guess on my part: Once the experts (medical professionals, mainly) estimated that there were enough bed and equipment to handle needs for any local outbreaks, we'd see a return to work.

That makes sense. At the end of the day, I think most folks hope for some normalcy to return - theatres, restraints, sports games, etc.

I but Amazon is doing very good business right now...

Around here, most of the larger employers are still working. If not all of them.

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:50 pm
by durnedwolf
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: durnedwolf

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

A wild guess on my part: Once the experts (medical professionals, mainly) estimated that there were enough bed and equipment to handle needs for any local outbreaks, we'd see a return to work.

That makes sense. At the end of the day, I think most folks hope for some normalcy to return - theatres, restraints, sports games, etc.

I but Amazon is doing very good business right now...

Around here, most of the larger employers are still working. If not all of them.

Things are pretty rural where I live and the area relies heavily on tourism. Stores\gas stations considered essential are open. Most of the restaurants, our local theatre, the bowling ally - they are closed or on order-take out. Hotels can only accept customers that are "essential" workers (basically contractors). This social distancing is a tough break for a lot of people that make near the minimum wage in an area with inflated tourist-enhanced prices.

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 5:03 pm
by JohnDillworth
here are some tools to help. We use this with students to get them thinking about the categories of bias and misrepresentation that might be occurring with some news sources, and it's pretty useful to get an idea of hw they stack up. When you search the icon appears near a news site and (usually) gives this rating page on rollover. Unfortunately due to the now cluttered landscape of blogs, privately owned and operated "news" sites and other areas of acquiring information online, not all are yet rated.

If anyone knows another method please post a link.
As mentioned elsewhere a rough rule of thumb is if a newspaper has consistently won Pulitzer prizes year, after year, after year there is every reason to expect quality, accurate reporting. The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, The Los Angles Times and The Wall Street Journal lead the league are good places to start. I'll also add The Orlando Sentinel, the Miami Herald, The Boston Globe and The Atlantic. The BBC is a good source as are many British Newspapers but some of them do seem to wear their bias on their sleeves a bit.

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 5:07 pm
by Canoerebel
An example from Monday, for Mind_Messing.

The U. Washington site (https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections) projected 1,967 deaths for the US today. Based upon the current tally of 900, and if the pattern for updating totals holds, it's unlikely that mortality will approach the projected amount. It might be significantly less.

It's worth keeping an eye on because better-than-expected results might well see future downward adjustment.

Image

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 5:09 pm
by Canoerebel
John, I know you and most folks believe that in good faith. I don't believe that. I could give substantial reasons why but it wouldn't be suitable for an AE forum in any way. I'd be glad to share with you privately. You'd disagree with my thoughts on the particular issue but might understand why I don't credit those sources (with some exceptions).


ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth
here are some tools to help. We use this with students to get them thinking about the categories of bias and misrepresentation that might be occurring with some news sources, and it's pretty useful to get an idea of hw they stack up. When you search the icon appears near a news site and (usually) gives this rating page on rollover. Unfortunately due to the now cluttered landscape of blogs, privately owned and operated "news" sites and other areas of acquiring information online, not all are yet rated.

If anyone knows another method please post a link.
As mentioned elsewhere a rough rule of thumb is if a newspaper has consistently won Pulitzer prizes year, after year, after year there is every reason to expect quality, accurate reporting. The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, The Los Angles Times and The Wall Street Journal lead the league are good places to start.

RE: OT: Corona virus

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 5:11 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

John, I know you and most folks believe that in good faith. I don't believe that. I could give substantial reasons why but it wouldn't be suitable for an AE forum in any way. I'd be glad to share with you privately. You'd disagree with my thoughts on the particular issue but might understand why I don't credit those sources (with some exceptions).
ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth
here are some tools to help. We use this with students to get them thinking about the categories of bias and misrepresentation that might be occurring with some news sources, and it's pretty useful to get an idea of hw they stack up. When you search the icon appears near a news site and (usually) gives this rating page on rollover. Unfortunately due to the now cluttered landscape of blogs, privately owned and operated "news" sites and other areas of acquiring information online, not all are yet rated.

If anyone knows another method please post a link.
As mentioned elsewhere a rough rule of thumb is if a newspaper has consistently won Pulitzer prizes year, after year, after year there is every reason to expect quality, accurate reporting. The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, The Los Angles Times and The Wall Street Journal lead the league are good places to start.

I agree.