Page 20 of 23

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 5:24 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Check trade agreements and relations if you want to make sure. Or production planning.
1) Trade agreements: No oil traded from Netherlands to CW.
2) Relations: Netherlands should be aligned to CW.
3) Production planning: The NEI oil that CW has use of should not have (TR) in front of the oil resource.

1) True
2) It says "Aligned (units)"
3) True (oil resources are as owned, not trade received)

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 5:25 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Axis get that ship.

Germany most like don't want it. Maybe Japan? Should I wait Axis player to come online?

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 5:28 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Axis get that ship.

Germany most like don't want it. Maybe Japan? Should I wait Axis player to come online?
Axis player is online. AllenK just answered although I think he mixed the games up. [;)]

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 5:30 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Axis get that ship.

Germany most like don't want it. Maybe Japan? Should I wait Axis player to come online?
warspite1

FFS Mayhemizer give me some time here! This is a big decision.

Listen, we need 48 hours - I'll have my people talk to AllenK's people and we'll get back to you.

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 5:30 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Axis get that ship.

Germany most like don't want it. Maybe Japan? Should I wait Axis player to come online?
Axis player is online. AllenK just answered although I think he mixed the games up. [;)]
Oh, it was AllenK. Damn I'm confused [:D]

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 5:30 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Axis get that ship.

Germany most like don't want it. Maybe Japan? Should I wait Axis player to come online?
I find it weird that MPs that doesn't co-operate with the conqueror can get the ship. Even weirder that a neutral Italy can get it. [:D]

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 5:32 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Axis get that ship.

Germany most like don't want it. Maybe Japan? Should I wait Axis player to come online?
warspite1

FFS Mayhemizer give me some time here! This is a big decision.

Listen, we need 48 hours - I'll have my people talk to AllenK's people and we'll get back to you.
[:D]

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 5:32 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Axis get that ship.

Germany most like don't want it. Maybe Japan? Should I wait Axis player to come online?
warspite1

FFS Mayhemizer give me some time here! This is a big decision.

Listen, we need 48 hours - I'll have my people talk to AllenK's people and we'll get back to you.
warspite1

Alternatively, as its a ship that will never be built why not just give it to the Germans and they can ignore its construction? [:)]

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 5:34 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Axis get that ship.

Germany most like don't want it. Maybe Japan? Should I wait Axis player to come online?
warspite1

FFS Mayhemizer give me some time here! This is a big decision.

Listen, we need 48 hours - I'll have my people talk to AllenK's people and we'll get back to you.
warspite1

Alternatively, as its a ship that will never be built why not just give it to the Germans and they can ignore its construction? [:)]
One never know what the Germans might do.

In reality, Artevelde was completed by the Germans to a different specification and renamed Lorelei; she
was to survive the war.

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 5:35 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Axis get that ship.

Germany most like don't want it. Maybe Japan? Should I wait Axis player to come online?
warspite1

FFS Mayhemizer give me some time here! This is a big decision.

Listen, we need 48 hours - I'll have my people talk to AllenK's people and we'll get back to you.
warspite1

Alternatively, as its a ship that will never be built why not just give it to the Germans and they can ignore its construction? [:)]
Roger that. I hope that is true and she is not going to sink my convoys?

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 5:55 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
CW produces 13 BPs and saves many oils. Convoy lines are not optimal at the moment...
Iraq oil goes to production in France and one BP is saved.

Allied fleet in North Sea returns to base, except one BB stays in guard.

CW reorg all for 2,2 oil.
US reorg one sub for no oil.

Production

China 8
INF
MOT
CAV div

CW 13
2x INF
Pilot
CVP-0
CVP-1
TRS (2nd)

US 11
CVP-1
TRS (2nd)
TRS (1st)
Sub (1st)
CV Saratoga (repair)
Pilot

Reinforcements

China
CAV in Chihkiang

CW
Assings pilot to LND3 Whitney
CV to Liverpool
CA and CP to Plymouth
LND London
INF India Dacca

US
TRS and GAR to San Diego

Lending recources
CW send oil instead of non oil resource to China
CW keeps sending 3 res (1 oil) to France, but stops sending BP.

Allies win initiative (Axis 2, Allied 3).

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 6:04 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Allies go first in fine weather.

Image

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 6:06 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: warspite1


warspite1

FFS Mayhemizer give me some time here! This is a big decision.

Listen, we need 48 hours - I'll have my people talk to AllenK's people and we'll get back to you.
warspite1

Alternatively, as its a ship that will never be built why not just give it to the Germans and they can ignore its construction? [:)]
One never know what the Germans might do.

In reality, Artevelde was completed by the Germans to a different specification and renamed Lorelei; she
was to survive the war.
warspite1

I know, I wrote the write-up [;)]


Image

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 6:08 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1

I know, I wrote the write-up [;)]
I assumed as much. [:)]

Edit: Maybe I should mention that almost every time I play MWIF I look at the write-up of a unit or two. Mostly ships that are less known to me.

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Sun May 06, 2018 5:31 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
M/J 40 Allied 1

No DoW

France and China land, all others combined.

US TRS loaded with GAR to Hawaiian Islands box 0.
Large CW fleet to North Sea box 3, including 2 TRS (land units AT gun, AA gun, INF div and INF).
CV, CA and BB to CSV box 0.

CW sends bombers to disturb German spear head, Spitfires escorts. Do Germany wish to intercept?

Ignore OOS Hurricane in UK, I was going to send it and clicked undo. It will be fine as soon as program see disorganized German ARM in Belgium.

Image

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Mon May 07, 2018 4:36 am
by AllenK
Yes please. Use 5 and 4 factor 109’s.

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Mon May 07, 2018 4:55 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
Which one is front fighter?

Whitley is front bomber.

Edit: just noticed that Gladiator can join the combat, it will be a backup fighter.

Image

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Mon May 07, 2018 5:11 am
by AllenK
Fine as it is.

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Mon May 07, 2018 5:25 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
Axis roll 9 and clears one CW bomber. I believe it's front bomber and I move on. Let me now if I was wrong and I go back.

RE: UK vs Nordic 1

Posted: Mon May 07, 2018 5:27 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
Spitfire shoots down German front fighter.

Allies stay, how about Axis? Air combat odds are now +1/-1 for Allies.