RE: Bring back the L2D2 Tabby!
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:00 pm
Someone was running an AI v AI test and stepped into Japan sometime in 44 and he found out he was fighting Bearcats.
ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger
Someone was running an AI v AI test and stepped into Japan sometime in 44 and he found out he was fighting Bearcats.
ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger
No, something about the AI getting R&D. Dont want to give everything away [;)]
ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl
ORIGINAL: khyberbill
What if Winnie had allowed the RAF to upgrade earlier? Shouldnt we decide when to upgrade, not Churchill? What if we decided that the P38 was a better plane than the P39? Shouldnt we decide to produce it in greater quantities earlier in the war? The trouble with "What Ifs" is that there are so many of them.
What I've always noticed in this forum is that virtually all the "What ifs" people bring up are to aid the Japanese. Glad to see someone pointing out that the Allies had a lot more "what ifs" available as well. I still remember with delight the screams of dismay when it was discovered that PDU worked for the Allies as well! [:D]
ORIGINAL: bradfordkay
Tophat, I assume that you've never played CHS, with a much more realistic OOB (no masses of LB30, or any allied 4E bombers in 1942). Since AE is the result of a great deal of painstaking OOB research, my guess is that you can expect things to be far different when you play that version...
ORIGINAL: bradfordkay
Tophat, I assume that you've never played CHS, with a much more realistic OOB (no masses of LB30, or any allied 4E bombers in 1942). Since AE is the result of a great deal of painstaking OOB research, my guess is that you can expect things to be far different when you play that version...
ORIGINAL: m10bob
ORIGINAL: bradfordkay
Tophat, I assume that you've never played CHS, with a much more realistic OOB (no masses of LB30, or any allied 4E bombers in 1942). Since AE is the result of a great deal of painstaking OOB research, my guess is that you can expect things to be far different when you play that version...
I am ever amazed at the comments made which are (as you noticed) throwbacks to the days of vanilla.
They are good for the soul........keeps me grounded.....knowing there are still the unlearned, if not disadvantaged,......still playing vanilla.[:D]
ORIGINAL: Tophat1812
ORIGINAL: m10bob
ORIGINAL: bradfordkay
Tophat, I assume that you've never played CHS, with a much more realistic OOB (no masses of LB30, or any allied 4E bombers in 1942). Since AE is the result of a great deal of painstaking OOB research, my guess is that you can expect things to be far different when you play that version...
I am ever amazed at the comments made which are (as you noticed) throwbacks to the days of vanilla.
They are good for the soul........keeps me grounded.....knowing there are still the unlearned, if not disadvantaged,......still playing vanilla.[:D]
No, and that is probably not the word I was looking for anyway..
As for your last post, you will never be able to count me as part of the crowd looking "down their noses" at the JFB's........I tried playing that side a few times, and it rewquires more real work that I have time....Every man should know his limitations.[8D]
Throwbacks? Hmmn,you must have had converse with one of my former teachers.