What's your Strategy?
https://forums.matrixgames.com:443/
ORIGINAL: sprior
Who's playing this game?
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
No one yet.ORIGINAL: sprior
Who's playing this game?
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
No way! That approach certainly won't work for me! [:D]ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
Frankly guys, I don't care. I'll sign off on whatever is necessary to satisfy you all. But I'll raise my objections now, and poke holes in them now,and then shut up about it once we start. In other words, I'll do my bitching now, not when were playing. [:D]
SHHH!!! [:-]ORIGINAL: Mynok
The Japanese do not have a major supply problem in China. They can bomb China into the stone age if they choose. It's less about stopping Allied bombing than Japanese destruction of China.
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Will you please get in contact with them and let us know what they identify as still being 'deeply flawed' enough for a HR?ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
Ask the people who built the game. What rules do they use. What flaws will be fixed next game. Quite simply , let's define the problem before we try to fix it.
OK. Who do you recommend? Mike said he had an email to someone about the next patch...who is it? Point me in the right direction and I'll hunt![:D]
ORIGINAL: Mynok
The Japanese do not have a major supply problem in China. They can bomb China into the stone age if they choose. It's less about stopping Allied bombing than Japanese destruction of China.
ORIGINAL: USS America
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
No one yet.ORIGINAL: sprior
Who's playing this game?
We're in the pre-war "pick a fight" stage. [:D] Steve and I are the Allies and CB and Mynok are the Japanese. Trying to hash out all the settings/HR's/etc that we are going to use.
ORIGINAL: USS America
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Will you please get in contact with them and let us know what they identify as still being 'deeply flawed' enough for a HR?
OK. Who do you recommend? Mike said he had an email to someone about the next patch...who is it? Point me in the right direction and I'll hunt![:D]
I PM'ed MichaelM to ask about the DB patch, since he's the only person I've seen mention it so far...
Pffft...hell no.ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
MORALITY perhaps? Naw. [:D]
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Mynok
The Japanese do not have a major supply problem in China. They can bomb China into the stone age if they choose. It's less about stopping Allied bombing than Japanese destruction of China.
Then that would seem to me to be the inaccurracy , the flaw as it were. Unless the Japanese had a specific reason NOT to bomb China. MORALITY perhaps? Naw. [:D]
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: USS America
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
No one yet.
We're in the pre-war "pick a fight" stage. [:D] Steve and I are the Allies and CB and Mynok are the Japanese. Trying to hash out all the settings/HR's/etc that we are going to use.
We're fighting the "pre-game" war to fight the war. And I think that I just moved into the "Designated A$$hole" position![:D]
ORIGINAL: USS America
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Mynok
The Japanese do not have a major supply problem in China. They can bomb China into the stone age if they choose. It's less about stopping Allied bombing than Japanese destruction of China.
Then that would seem to me to be the inaccurracy , the flaw as it were. Unless the Japanese had a specific reason NOT to bomb China. MORALITY perhaps? Naw. [:D]
I think the reason they did not bomb industry in China (very much) was that the historical situation was much more of a quagmire than the game is able to represent. The game is awesome, but almost everyone would agree that the China theater is one of the weaker areas.
I'll throw this out to chew on. Could we consider our own "quiet China" approach? Basically, leave China alone. Does this give one side or the other a significant advantage? I'll admit, it is the area of the game that I enjoy the least, but since it's the area I understand the least, I can't say what impact this could or would have on the game as we play it out. As I sit here and type, I think about this more, and it goes against my instincts. I'm a "play the game" type of guy. I appreciate that the proposed SB HR benefits the Allies a good bit. I have no problem with it.
Naw...ORIGINAL: USS America
Could we consider our own "quiet China" approach? Basically, leave China alone.
ORIGINAL: Walloc
U guys want input on HRs or is this thread so u can hash it out between ya?
Read = other ppls HRs and reason behind them.
Kind regards,
Rasmus
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Naw...ORIGINAL: USS America
Could we consider our own "quiet China" approach? Basically, leave China alone.