Page 3 of 5
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:02 pm
by Webbco
Resist....RESIST!!

RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:10 pm
by Kayoz
ORIGINAL: Webbco
Resist....RESIST!!
I'm resisting the urge to flame him. I'm being (for a given value of) good.
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:12 pm
by J HG T
Just drop it Kayoz and walk away. Walk away and continue your life.
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:16 pm
by Data
That would be impossible, can you imagine it happening? [:)]
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:18 pm
by J HG T
Easily.
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:20 pm
by Kayoz
ORIGINAL: J HG T
Just drop it Kayoz and walk away. Walk away and continue your life.
I think this might get your message across better... yes?
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:25 pm
by J HG T
Probably. There's just so many great Failure motivationals on the net that not using them would be criminal. Also, I love Smash Bros. series.
Anyway, I hope you got the point.
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:27 pm
by Webbco
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 2:28 pm
by Kayoz
ORIGINAL: J HG T
Probably. There's just so many great Failure motivationals on the net that not using them would be criminal. Also, I love Smash Bros. series.
Anyway, I hope you got the point.
I? You used "I"????
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 2:53 pm
by J HG T
So? People use "I" when they refer to themselves in english language, as swedish use "jag" and as finnish use "minä".
You sure are funny guy Kayoz. [:)]
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:21 pm
by Kayoz
ORIGINAL: J HG T
So? People use "I" when they refer to themselves in english language, as swedish use "jag" and as finnish use "minä".
You sure are funny guy Kayoz. [:)]
You always use "we" - "We approve", for example. It seemed uncharacteristic.
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:42 pm
by Webbco
Kayoz, J GH T was right with the "I". This thread doesn't make sense any more....[&:]
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:45 pm
by Kayoz
ORIGINAL: Webbco
Kayoz, J GH T was right with the "I". This thread doesn't make sense any more....[&:]
No no no - if you read J GH T's posts, he
always uses "we" - I suppose it's a Star Trekky Borg thing. First time I've seen him use "I".
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:56 pm
by J HG T
It's kinda a inside joke, Kayoz. Refers to hive-minds, group-minds, conjoiners and other similar societys in SciFi.
Examples: the Geth in Mass Effect, the Advent in Sins and hive-minds in DW. I find the concept both fascinating and scary. But still mostly fascinating.
Also, always means 100% all the time, and I clearly don't use "we" always. Pay attentation.
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:32 pm
by Data
J's right, I also noticed him using we in particular situations and not all the time....just as he uses aye in particular situations and not all the time.
But this is just a tactic to divert the subject, distract attention....and I'm not referring to J
In the end Webbco is right, this is a pointless pattern - attacking and diverting; nothing but hollow rhetoric
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:42 pm
by J HG T
Aye!
And apologies from my part for continuing this kinda pointless conversation. We shall punish ourselves by abstaining from playing DW for a day.
Will not (probably) happen again.
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:46 pm
by Kayoz
ORIGINAL: Data
In the end Webbco is right, this is a pointless pattern - attacking and diverting; nothing but hollow rhetoric
Divert? I noticed a deviation in J's referrals to himself - I thought it was amusing that he always used "we" - and this was the first instance I've noticed that he's used, "I". Are you suggesting I should start a new thread to query it?
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:57 pm
by Data
I'm finished here, do whatever pleases you...and doesn't affect others in a negative way.
I'll have to abstain two days now....but someone has to defeat the dominators anyway [:)]
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:58 pm
by EaglePryde
stop missusing threads where you clearly don't have any kind of knowledge other than your poor ego
RE: Theoretical Multiplayer Setup
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 6:56 pm
by Kayoz
ORIGINAL: EaglePryde
stop missusing threads where you clearly don't have any kind of knowledge other than your poor ego
Considering that you don't know the difference between a program and an operating system, you can probably figure out how dearly I hold your opinion.
Kid, I've kicked about everything you've thrown into this thread, out of the park. I've shown almost every statement you've made to be false, misleading or completely senseless. And in the end, you've admitted that you're wrong. And now you're back for more. Why are you continuing this masochistic behaviour?
Perhaps Data disagrees with my methods and thinks I'm not being terribly "nice" in my dealings with you - but then again my objective isn't to be "nice". If you could come up with something that was insightful or new, then you'd probably find me more pleasant - but for some unknown reason, you insist on debating an issue which you know little or nothing about. Maybe he feels sorry for you - but I don't. I haven't put a gun to your head and forced you to write - any entry here is entirely your choice.
So choose what you want to do now.