Page 3 of 3
RE: Books on Eastern Front Logistic?
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:36 am
by goranw
Hi!
Here is the Leningrad scenario turn 10. AI against AI. Rail conversions 21 aug. Note the absence at Dünaburg.
Advance in other aspects as usual very historical North and North-East in the Baltics.
Goran
RE: Books on Eastern Front Logistic?
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:29 am
by goranw
OOB Barbarossa start. ( with Stab Bruns in OK NORD)
Goran
RE: Books on Eastern Front Logistic?
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:38 pm
by marty_01
Thanks for the additional translation work Goranw & Wosung.
RE: Books on Eastern Front Logistic?
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 11:16 am
by goranw
Since there seems to be an interest in the Stab Bruns (Riga) I will put up a map showing the Brückenschläge 1 juli-21 okt but its to complicated to
make it readable in a size allowed to post here. Instead its put up at the Forum Scenario design and modding. At the file about "Planning map"
Goran
RE: Books on Eastern Front Logistic?
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:42 am
by goranw
Versorgung 22-6-41
GoranW
RE: Books on Eastern Front Logistic?
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:43 am
by goranw
Versorgung 26-7-41
GoranW
RE: Books on Eastern Front Logistic?
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:37 am
by goranw
Versorgung 19-10-41
GoranW
RE: Books on Eastern Front Logistic?
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 3:45 pm
by Hanny
ORIGINAL: wosung
ORIGINAL: Richrd
FWIW:
From Germany and the 2nd WW, Vol. 6.
Fuel consumption Ostheer Mid Oct 1941- Mid March 1942 667.292 cubic meters or tons, on average 11 trains a day. For this period, ammo consumption was 390.000 tons, pp. 788-790.
Daily fuel consumption Ostheer in Sept. 1942.: 5.000-6.000 cubic meters or tons, p. 946.
I have a question, i can see the book uses cubic metres, but that is not the same as metric tons or Imperial tons. 11 trains is a standard weight of 450 tons, so thats a constant. But converting cubic metres to imperial tons, is a lot less tons than the train tonnage tons. while 11 trains a day is 750,000 tons. Quite a difference. Is it a translation problem and the book means metric tons?