Page 3 of 4
RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:13 am
by JAMiAM
The Center.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:13 am
by JAMiAM
The big picture in the South, with battles marked.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:13 am
by JAMiAM
A closer look.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:14 am
by JAMiAM
Losses and OOB for the end of Turn 41.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:45 am
by Peltonx
The lines are not important for him at this stage. Unless he is setting you up for something in June, of which I see two possiblities in the south.
1942 is about pocketing units as the combat ratio blows during 1942 once 1v1=2v1 was removed.
If he cant pocket units every turn to forse you to burn up AP's and keep the ratio above 3 to 1 hes lossing even if he is building up morale and gaining land.
Hes just plain not doing the air war right if hes at 1v1 in losses and probably has not been from the start. My advice to German player follow Katza's tips on the airwar.
Not sure why the guy quit that you took over for, because other then the fact he took some hvyer then normal loses he was in great shape. Mike's forses are not in that great of shape eather for that matter for the spring of 1942.
Game was clearly still in the balance.
Mike needed to get a pocket during the spring to get you off balance some and it does not appear he will be able to.
He needs a pocket withen the first few turns of summer or he will be in trouble and running out of options fast.
RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 4:52 am
by JAMiAM
The view of the North.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 4:53 am
by JAMiAM
A big stretch in the Center.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 4:53 am
by JAMiAM
The still messy South.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 4:53 am
by JAMiAM
OOB and losses for Turn 42.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:02 am
by Harrybanana
JAMiAM,
I noticed that you had no saved APs and you have now patched to 1.05.59c. How are you handling the decrease in Command Capacity for all your Army HQs? Bad timing that the patch came out for you just after March madness.
RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:31 am
by JAMiAM
ORIGINAL: Harrybanana
JAMiAM,
I noticed that you had no saved APs and you have now patched to 1.05.59c. How are you handling the decrease in Command Capacity for all your Army HQs? Bad timing that the patch came out for you just after March madness.
I am now patched to 1.05.59c, but this turn was played several days ago, using the .53 patch. I am going to have a tough time with getting my Armies under Command Capacity, and it probably won't be until I get the big dump of APs from Voronezh Front, in June, that everything will finally be straightened out. Fortunately, part of my plan, before the changes instituted in .59c, was to run a leaner Soviet Army, due to the overloading of Stavka. Much of my unit merging, and future buildout plans were predicated on this. Though I no longer need to worry about Stavka overloading, I will now have to worry about the Army overloading. So, what I will probably have to do is to build at least another three or four Combined Arms armies, in order to get everyone under Command Cap, and shunt off the excess to the Military Districts (for training) or to Stavka for general (re)distribution.
RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:42 am
by JAMiAM
With mud comes a slew of boring screenshots...

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:42 am
by JAMiAM
The Center.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:42 am
by JAMiAM
The South, which gets a little action during Mike's turn.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:43 am
by JAMiAM
During my half of the turn, I launched no attacks and only suffered a couple of minor interdictions. Hence, only the OOB shot to track the numbers.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:25 am
by JAMiAM
A slightly less boring picture in the North. Only because I just now realized I've got a "lost and wayward" reinforcement...

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:25 am
by JAMiAM
More nothing to see in the Center.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:25 am
by JAMiAM
The beginning of my phased withdrawal in the South.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:26 am
by JAMiAM
OOB and Losses for my half of Turn 44.

RE: Taking arms against a sea of troubles...(no Mike 29)
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2012 6:50 am
by JAMiAM
The front had mud in all zones this turn, so the pictures will be boring again. My Northern shot...
