RE: Aircraft SFT Pictures
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2015 9:45 pm
Level bombers. Based on He-111 H. I have three views. Also, I made a fully German version.
Zip file with the png image files.
Page 3 of 3
RE: Aircraft SFT Pictures
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2015 9:46 pm
RE: Aircraft SFT Pictures
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 12:47 pm
Webizen, Ask and ye shall receive.
I made a generic B-17 and B-29 as well as US versions. Actually, the generic versions are heavily based on actual Bomb Groups. (For the B-17 generic is in 15th Airforce, while the US is in the 8th Air force. For the B-29's they are both in the 20th Air Force, the generic is the same group as Bockscar, which I didn't realize at the time). Are the poses sufficient?
I made a generic B-17 and B-29 as well as US versions. Actually, the generic versions are heavily based on actual Bomb Groups. (For the B-17 generic is in 15th Airforce, while the US is in the 8th Air force. For the B-29's they are both in the 20th Air Force, the generic is the same group as Bockscar, which I didn't realize at the time). Are the poses sufficient?
RE: Aircraft SFT Pictures
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 12:48 pm
The zip file with .pngs.
RE: Aircraft SFT Pictures
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 10:27 pm
Carrier Dive Bomber based on SBD Dauntless
US Carrier Dive Bomber
US Dive Bomber based on A-24 Banshee (which is also the Dauntless).
US Carrier Dive Bomber
US Dive Bomber based on A-24 Banshee (which is also the Dauntless).
RE: Aircraft SFT Pictures
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 10:27 pm
The .png files
Edited and replaced file. I noticed that I made them 192x142 again. I also added a German Dive Bomber.
Edited and replaced file. I noticed that I made them 192x142 again. I also added a German Dive Bomber.
RE: Aircraft SFT Pictures
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 12:24 am
Damn those are awesome! I wish I could do that, guess Im relegated to envy and theft@ LOL!
RE: Aircraft SFT Pictures
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 3:22 am
Thanks! You are going to make my head swell.
But Gary was right. You can do it, however, it does take some time to learn how. I started around Christmas, and disappeared for several months. I also went down at least one blind alley by choosing a cheap program (Hexagon 2) that was no longer supported. In the end, I bit the bullet, and chose the cheapest of all, but had a reputation as having a steep learning curve - Blender. Hexagon was OK, only $40, and there are good tutorials, but would crash and has no render engine. Blender has a spectacular render engine, although it takes some getting used to.
After a bit, I also confess, I cut some corners since I was only after a 192x144 figure.
I suppose both V1 and V2 are left to be done.
But Gary was right. You can do it, however, it does take some time to learn how. I started around Christmas, and disappeared for several months. I also went down at least one blind alley by choosing a cheap program (Hexagon 2) that was no longer supported. In the end, I bit the bullet, and chose the cheapest of all, but had a reputation as having a steep learning curve - Blender. Hexagon was OK, only $40, and there are good tutorials, but would crash and has no render engine. Blender has a spectacular render engine, although it takes some getting used to.
After a bit, I also confess, I cut some corners since I was only after a 192x144 figure.
I suppose both V1 and V2 are left to be done.