Page 3 of 10

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 12:31 pm
by gwgardner
ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653
the AXIS AI has been VERY hesitant
I hope I didn't screw something up! Actually, that should be on the base game as I haven't messed with that [to my knowledge]. I also don't recall seeing that type of behavior in any of my games, so I'm not sure why it is doing that.

Since the Russkies refused the adjustment to Molotov/Ribbontrop, they held all of east Poland, up to Warsaw. I wonder if that extension of Russian held territory messed with the AI's standard Barbarossa plans. Since late July the German AI has been more aggressive, but seems to hold it's armor back. There have been no armored breakthroughs, just steady movement forward.

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 12:34 pm
by gwgardner
ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653

my level 0 maritime bombers cannot attack subs.
Well, I cheated and set up all the Convoy Locations outside of the initial
Maritime Bomber Range. This hopefully mirrors the Allies inability to stop the subs at the beginning of the war [and, gives the player another pressure choice - Maritime Bomber upgrade or something else].

Actually my maritime bombers, with a range of 6, have been able to target the subs, but the system simply does not allow the attack. Perhaps it's supply reductions, due to the positioning of the bombers.

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2017 1:27 pm
by gwgardner
It's now May '42 in my 653N game. Got the Guards units from Siberia, and the US provided a strength 6 maritime bomber from the 'US provides escort carriers' event.

Since it started Barbarossa so late, the German AI did not advance historically, still 2-300 miles behind historical lines by the end of '41. It did suffer a severe winter effect in '41.

So far I think the 653 OOB is just right balance-wise. Will have a better idea as time progresses of course.

I did confirm that it required ASW research level of 1 before the maritime units could actually attack the German subs.

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2017 2:11 pm
by sPzAbt653
I did confirm that it required ASW research level of 1 before the maritime units could actually attack the German subs.
I don't know why that is. I've had three full play throughs as the Allies and haven't noticed it. I'll pay more attention next time thru [:)]

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 12:26 pm
by reef75
I've been on the fence a long time with this game but finally decided to get it. Mostly this due to your mod as it looks a better rendition of the conflict. However I just noticed I have a different game version number than what your saying the mod is for probably due to my copy being from Steam. Will this mean its incompatible ? Thanks for any help..

steve

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 12:32 pm
by gwgardner
I play with the Steam version of the game, along with the 653N mod.

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:11 pm
by reef75
Thanks for letting me know. Does it not throw up balance problems with it being a different version ? Also sorry to be a pest, but is it ok to play this mod with a map mod also ? Thanks again..

steve

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 6:10 pm
by sPzAbt653
I don't even know what Steam is, so I'm afraid I cannot answer any questions about it.
As far as the map mod, if you tell me what it is I might be able to answer.

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 6:32 pm
by reef75
Steam is the biggest online games market used by a good few millions. Its usually slower to get the latest patches but does so automatically. However that leaves many players on 1.08 at the moment which is why I asked if it would effect balances in your mod. It was a link by the Devs on the games Steam news about a mod AAR that brought me here. The map mod is the board game map mod by Welk. Sorry to bother you with all this.

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:04 pm
by gwgardner
I was using Welk's map mod too, but then realized that the 653N map must be used due to the naval changes, eg the convoy target hexes. Similarly one has to use the 653N counters.

I play the version 1.8 on Steam, and have had no problem that I can identify. I could find no definitive explanation of what changed with regard to balance, with 1.9.

On another note, my choice not to carry out the Mers-el-Kebir attack came back to haunt me, for when I landed US troops near Casablanca the French navy, in the form of the coastal guns, were there to deny me.

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:19 am
by reef75
Looks like I am good to go then :) Thanks for all your help.

steve

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:29 am
by sPzAbt653
Thanks guys, I'll put a note in Post #1 about not using other mods with this one.

As Steam is behind the current version, I suppose that it presents no problems [note that the current posted version of 653N is for v.1.09.06 of SC3]. Generally, due to the time that is involved in releasing new 653N versions, they will be behind the latest official SC3 version [generally].

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 1:18 pm
by gwgardner
The Axis AI is hitting me hard in the sea game. I've learned that the Allies need to really push ASW research as fast as possible. It's mid 1942 and subs are hitting my convoys generally 15 MPPs a turn, and were able to destroy one transport fleet from the UK around the Horn.

Similarly, the USSR cannot devote an inordinate amount to research early on. Idid that, and now the AXIS AI is knocking on the doors of both Leningrad and Moscow, and have a pretty much free hand south and east of Rostov. Loss of Stalingrad is definitely possible. I'm refitting destroyed infantry corps as fast as possible, and pusing them back in the line, but it's going to come down to the wire IF I can stop the AXIS.

To tell you the truth, this is the first time I've played to and through 1942, where the issue was in doubt. Of course I have almost always played the AXIS before.


RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:22 pm
by sPzAbt653
this is the first time I've played to and through 1942, where the issue was in doubt.
Hubert's Axis 'AI' definitely scares me in Russia when I play as the Allies. Note that because most Soviet tanks are represented in their Infantry Upgrade, you do need to keep that Research Category going. Command and Control is the second Research Category that I focus on for the USSR, because that increases your HQ movement [the USSR HQ units start with only 1 MP].
Also, maybe you know this, but newly created units are placed on the map at 50% Morale and Readiness, which makes them vulnerable. I always place the USSR Corps where they won't be needed [hopefully] when they arrive, so that on the next turn they are up to around 75%.
Still, wherever the Panzers are, you can expect trouble. Hubert has made it so that this can differ from game to game [the area of main effort] [:)]

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:12 pm
by gwgardner
Anything in the mod hindering the start of US lend-lease to the USSR? I got the warning from the US that I could not approach certain areas of Finland, and did not go near them. It's late '43 and no lend-lease yet.

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:59 pm
by sPzAbt653
Thanks again, I need to add a note about this to keep it clear. You've got two actual convoy lines on the map, one from USA to UK [represented on Lake Ontario] and the other from the UK to USSR [represented in the Gulf of Oman, far bottom right of map]. These should both be showing in those end-of-turn MPP reports.

RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:33 am
by gwgardner
Have never seen either of those mentioned on an end of turn report. Should I be looking for the words lendlease or simply an MPP transfer? Or the convoy name.

I see MPPs sent by the UK to Russia and US to UK.


RE: 653N Mod

Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:45 am
by gwgardner
A suggestion/request for the 653 mod: can you do something about the uselessness of strategic bombing? The Allies have a heavy investment in them for research and production, but when they are used, they do little damage and take huge losses. I know this is a base game problem, not the mod, but perhaps you can improve on things.

I currently have 7 strat bombers based in the UK which cost perhaps 2000 MPPs, at level 2 (cost about 350 MPPs), and for example on the last turn they did altogether 8 damage points and took about 8 strength point losses. To repair those losses is going to cost something like 8x17 MPPs, which is far greater than the accumulated damage to the AXIS.

Without some mod to strat bombing I'm guessing most players won't invest in them.

RE: 653N Mod v1.3

Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 10:57 pm
by sPzAbt653
So if I read Post #57 right, the convoys are ok ? [I haven't played as the Allies in a few months so I can't remember but I feel that things were working as designed. I just finished a game as the Axis, and will soon start a new game as the Allies, and I will verify the convoys].

The Strategic Bombers - I agree with you but I have some more experience with the game so I can offer some insight. I've found that the US/UK Strats are very valuable in North Africa, the Mid-East and Italy when pushing back the Axis. As you observed, not much damage is done in NE Europe during 41-43. This may be due to Allied Upgrade Levels vs. Axis AA Levels, plus Allied Escorts vs. Axis Interceptors, but I'm not sure. However, I have found that once the Allies have footholds in Europe and Northern Italy, the Allied Strats cause havoc to the Axis.
So in NE Europe/UK from 41-43 I don't do much with Strats, but when it is time for D-Day I use them to hit the supply and rail resources, which can really hurt the Germans. This also causes the German Escorts to take heavy losses [the German fighters are also easy to eliminate at this point]. The Strats can be rebuilt over the winter and made ready for the final push into Germany, where they crush the German supply net every turn.
In summary, I think it all evens out. I think.

RE: 653N Mod v1.3

Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:50 am
by gwgardner
I see no indication that the lend-lease convoy through Oman does anything. No US lendlease to USSR. The Great Lakes convoy, also don't know. I see US to UK MPPs, but they're not labeled lendlease.