RE: Need a good Eastern Front book
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:09 pm
I wouldn't be too critical re editing. All of these manuscripts should be seen by a proofreader and editor before going to the publishers so if there are typos, then there is someone else to blame.
I accept it doesn't impress to see the sorts of errors you describe, but I find them much less disturbing than say errors in fact, which turn me right off any text, I'm afraid.
Also, re writing skills, Glantz may not be an Anthony Beevor or Max Hastings, but then neither was Erickson. However, both men had put in countless hours of research into previously unknown and innaccessible archives. I'll take them warts and all if the alternative is ignorance.
Regards,
IronDuke
I accept it doesn't impress to see the sorts of errors you describe, but I find them much less disturbing than say errors in fact, which turn me right off any text, I'm afraid.
Also, re writing skills, Glantz may not be an Anthony Beevor or Max Hastings, but then neither was Erickson. However, both men had put in countless hours of research into previously unknown and innaccessible archives. I'll take them warts and all if the alternative is ignorance.
Regards,
IronDuke