Page 3 of 3

RE: Name This...(315 Special Edation)

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 5:13 am
by pompack
ORIGINAL: rhohltjr
ORIGINAL: steveh11Matrix

But, sadly, just about impossible to model in WitP...

[&:]Why just about impossible to model? [&:] If Witp has the Okha why would a simulated radio controlled air dropped bomb be impossible. Less percentage of a hit than the human guided Okha? So what.
ORIGINAL: Apollo11
...

strange enough that Allies didn't try to emulate it into primitive guided bombs of their own (the first mention of combat usage of US guided bombs, as far as I know, are against some North Vietnamese bridge in 1960's - which is 20+ years later)...

Please check this out

http://biomicro.sdstate.edu/pederses/asmbat.html

Image

Also check this out, I think the AZON preceeded the BAT.

http://www.455th.ukpc.net/tomfeise/455th/458azon.htm


Also somewhere I have a reference that refers to AZON being highly successful at bridge bustin in Burma. Unfortunately I can't recall the reference

RE: Name This...(315 Special Edation)

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 7:25 am
by rhondabrwn
ORIGINAL: String
ORIGINAL: Mark Weston

Somebody in Britain wanted to develop a pigeon-guided bomb. He trained pigeons to peck pictures of german warships behind a glass screen, and reckoned that with a pigeon in front looking through a window its pecks could be turned into control movements for a flying bomb.

For some reason, the authorities didn't take him seriously...

those bombs were actually built and worked better than the early radar guided ones..

I could actually see that working, but first you would have to acquire a ship profile in the targeting screen for the pigeon to activate and start pecking on the target / control screen. Seems like that would require a dive bomber to release the "pigeon bomb" with the target already in the sights.

What an absolutely fascinating thread! You guys continue to amaze me with your knowledge! [&o]