RE: Wild Bill!!!
Posted: Sun May 14, 2006 9:37 pm
Wild Bill, ever the diplomat 
Now let's settle this. As of the relevance issue I have already argued that it could be posted as a proper public thread for discussion if need be, but this thread just looks like yet another irrelevant thread from the outside. Please note that my initial post was a one-liner, meaning that this was not a big complaint, and also I stated that I did not want to be 'imposing', which ensured that my suggestion was as weak and un-intimidating as a suggestion can be - thus hopefully conveying that this is not a serious issue. Now people are saying that I'm 'uptight', wear 'panties' and I'm accused of having 'moderator' dreams, and people take further light-hearted pot-shots in the other thread. What kind of behaviour is this? Should I take rubber gloves on when typing? Should I wrap my sentences in apologies and excuses for posting a corrective statement? Who are the real wannabe-moderators here?
Now let's settle this. As of the relevance issue I have already argued that it could be posted as a proper public thread for discussion if need be, but this thread just looks like yet another irrelevant thread from the outside. Please note that my initial post was a one-liner, meaning that this was not a big complaint, and also I stated that I did not want to be 'imposing', which ensured that my suggestion was as weak and un-intimidating as a suggestion can be - thus hopefully conveying that this is not a serious issue. Now people are saying that I'm 'uptight', wear 'panties' and I'm accused of having 'moderator' dreams, and people take further light-hearted pot-shots in the other thread. What kind of behaviour is this? Should I take rubber gloves on when typing? Should I wrap my sentences in apologies and excuses for posting a corrective statement? Who are the real wannabe-moderators here?