Page 21 of 28
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:45 pm
by Hanzberger
Oh Sweet,N scale, that is the little guys? (Nashvillen)[8|]
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:58 pm
by nashvillen
Yes, indeed, we are the little guys (says the 6'3" former D lineman that weighs 300+ pounds).
See my groups web page:
http://www.nashvillentrak.org
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:15 pm
by CaptDave
ORIGINAL: nashvillen
Yes, indeed, we are the little guys (says the 6'3" former D lineman that weighs 300+ pounds).
See my groups web page:
http://www.nashvillentrak.org
As does the former equipment manager of pretty much the same proportions (2 inches shorter). To those of us in the know, that's "Normal" scale (as opposed to Zany, Totally Terrible, Hugely Oversized, Strange, Outrageous, and Gross). The rest of the world thinks N got its name because the track gauge is 9mm and the word for "nine" starts with the letter N in practically every language, but true N scalers know better. [:D]
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:39 pm
by herwin
ORIGINAL: CaptDave
ORIGINAL: nashvillen
Yes, indeed, we are the little guys (says the 6'3" former D lineman that weighs 300+ pounds).
See my groups web page:
http://www.nashvillentrak.org
As does the former equipment manager of pretty much the same proportions (2 inches shorter). To those of us in the know, that's "Normal" scale (as opposed to Zany, Totally Terrible, Hugely Oversized, Strange, Outrageous, and Gross). The rest of the world thinks N got its name because the track gauge is 9mm and the word for "nine" starts with the letter N in practically every language, but true N scalers know better. [:D]
I don't know, but I think I know what you mean... In a rugby game, an NFL all-pro MLB once got the ball and it was my job to take him down. He scored, but I was still holding on. My playing weight was 175 pounds.
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 7:31 pm
by nashvillen
ORIGINAL: CaptDave
ORIGINAL: nashvillen
Yes, indeed, we are the little guys (says the 6'3" former D lineman that weighs 300+ pounds).
See my groups web page:
http://www.nashvillentrak.org
As does the former equipment manager of pretty much the same proportions (2 inches shorter). To those of us in the know, that's "Normal" scale (as opposed to Zany, Totally Terrible, Hugely Oversized, Strange, Outrageous, and Gross). The rest of the world thinks N got its name because the track gauge is 9mm and the word for "nine" starts with the letter N in practically every language, but true N scalers know better. [:D]
+1
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 6:18 am
by inqistor
As I understand this is not stock scenario? What exactly was the economic changes for this MOD?
I hope it is almost impossible to starve Japan industry in 8 months in stock?
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:17 pm
by bigred
ORIGINAL: Hanzberger
Big Red, go to your industry screen, sort the fuel, most at the top and post a screen shot.
STOP shipping oil. Do not refuel at the HI's. (the small ASW crap is ok).
All your other numbers look good to me. I haven't played as far as you yet but I have read enough.
I would turn the H industry back on, don't wanna get low on supply.
You can email your latest save and I take a look around, not an expert, but maybe I will see something.
Let me know what version your playing.
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:19 pm
by bigred
ORIGINAL: inqistor
As I understand this is not stock scenario? What exactly was the economic changes for this MOD?
I hope it is almost impossible to starve Japan industry in 8 months in stock?
I understand you would like a challenge.
tm.asp?m=2452466
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 1:40 am
by John 3rd
The newest version of RA (3.0) isn't toooooo far from being released. The economy changes are not too big. I'd say we're about 75% finished and want the new patch released before we are done...
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:15 pm
by Sun Tempest
ORIGINAL: bigred
and the alert chart:
I opened the road from Singers to Port Authur about 20 days ago....I then rebased some convoys to PA, which now seems to have been a mistake...I have plenty of oil on Honshu...
bigred, I would have request from you. I'm not sure about the existence of Port Arthur Singapore highway, with some say that exist while either deny. Could you provide several images with the evolution of oil and fuel stocks in China, Manchucko, Thailand, Vietnam areas in last 30-40 turns.
Thank you and sorry for derailing your topic[&o]
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 1:51 am
by bigred
ORIGINAL: Hanzberger
Big Red, go to your industry screen, sort the fuel, most at the top and post a screen shot.
STOP shipping oil. Do not refuel at the HI's. (the small ASW crap is ok).
All your other numbers look good to me. I haven't played as far as you yet but I have read enough.
I would turn the H industry back on, don't wanna get low on supply.
You can email your latest save and I take a look around, not an expert, but maybe I will see something.
Let me know what version your playing.
hans, go ahead and post those airflow charts...they apply to senario 1 and 2 ...I like to share knowledge.
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:44 pm
by inqistor
I see vague mentioning about initial fuel reduction, but how big it is actually? Does it include also oil, or number of refineries?
I have seen shortages of supply at this time-point, but there should be enough fuel, for at least another 6 months, even with serious fleet actions. For sure refineries should produce enough to fuel all HI.
Are those 999 turned off refineries all in Japan?
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:20 pm
by bigred
Are those 999 turned off refineries all in Japan?
All refineries are "on". Not all refineries are repaired.
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:37 pm
by bigred
I see vague mentioning about initial fuel reduction, but how big it is actually? Does it include also oil, or number of refineries?
This is the starting RA70 oil and supply situation. Dont remember senario 2 dec7 start levels.
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:47 pm
by bigred
ORIGINAL: Sun Tempest
ORIGINAL: bigred
and the alert chart:
I opened the road from Singers to Port Authur about 20 days ago....I then rebased some convoys to PA, which now seems to have been a mistake...I have plenty of oil on Honshu...
bigred, I would have request from you. I'm not sure about the existence of Port Arthur Singapore highway, with some say that exist while either deny. Could you provide several images with the evolution of oil and fuel stocks in China, Manchucko, Thailand, Vietnam areas in last 30-40 turns.
Thank you and sorry for derailing your topic[&o]
Ok, maybe I can look up some old files...off the top of my head I noticed marginal increases at HK, Shanghai, PA, but did not look at Puson until today. Looks like the Port Auther route opened around the 5th of August 42...I will load a file frome 1 aug42 w/ a look to above mentioned ports...Then I will post a current picture.
I do remember Singers resources jumped 300000 after the road opened...I was mildly shocked.
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:15 pm
by bigred
The China road: not open on 3aug42.
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:20 pm
by bigred
Ports status 3 aug 42:
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:26 pm
by bigred
ports SRA 3 aug42:
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:32 pm
by bigred
ports sept 42:
RE: 9-15-42
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:40 pm
by bigred
SRA Sept ports:
