Page 216 of 259
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Thu May 21, 2020 8:21 am
by kevinkins
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Thu May 21, 2020 8:50 am
by Struan76
Similar idea has been kicking around since Dale Brown era (B-52 Megafortress, etc).
I think the problem is the Arsenal becomes a massive high value target. The US is moving towards flat, distributed ops with lots of sensors and shooters. Having just one shooter doesn't really line up with Deptula's 'Mosaic Warfare' concept.
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Thu May 21, 2020 10:47 am
by kevinkins
I supposed you could read the article as if the triton and B1s loaded with LRASMs as part of the Mosaic (or the disaggregated "kill web"). But Arsenal a/c are vulnerable as you mentioned and they tend to be contrary to the idea. The triton itself fits with the idea better.
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Fri May 22, 2020 9:50 am
by kevinkins
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Tue May 26, 2020 1:51 pm
by redcoat
The U.S. has assessed that Moscow has deployed military fighter aircraft to Libya to support Russian state-sponsored private military contractors (PMCs) operating on the ground there:
https://www.africom.mil/media-room/pressrelease/32789/russia-deploys-military-fighter-aircraft-to-libya
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 8:57 am
by Struan76
This might be mentioned elsewhere here, but conceptually USAF is moving towards 'disposable' or low-cost attritable UAVs to carry the weapons. Tyler R has a long article on The Drive about the Flying Missile Rail from DARPA. The Loyal Wingman idea is about carrying the sensor payload to find and disrupt the targets. It sounds like the LCATs would be in front, like MALD, but with a bunch of embedded AI. No idea on cost but it has to be less than a manned aircraft ... or an S-300/400 missile.
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 11:39 am
by Broncepulido
Probably the best and most updated source on Russian aircraft deployed on Libya is Tom Cooper's FaceBook:
https://www.facebook.com/keksifarm.hayday
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 12:02 pm
by kevinkins
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 2:33 pm
by Primarchx
Reminds me of how China announced they'd bought the Varyag to be a 'floating casino' instead of refurbishing it back into a carrier, as they did.
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 5:48 pm
by kevinkins
https://www.cnet.com/news/this-electric ... -flight/or
Just wonder where all that power comes from? The sun, wind or fossil fuel.
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Fri May 29, 2020 9:26 am
by kevinkins
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:41 am
by kevinkins
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 7:18 pm
by IceCreamSocialist
The Finnish Defense Forces has just released a video detailing how they would respond to any situation in their country. Also, if you pause at around 1:40 you can see a screenshot of what appears to be C:MO. It's not allowing me to post links so I'll just post the ending of the url for anybody who wants to watch it.
/watch/?v=bTmWCbcYwb8
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 1:01 pm
by kevinkins
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2020 2:52 pm
by GrayPenguine
Some specifications regarding the new Italian destroyers (DDX Class)
attached below.
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 1:21 pm
by kevinkins
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:57 pm
by Figeac
Hi everybody,
Just would like to share with you this fine video of the Brazilian Navy testing the Penguin and Exocet missiles on a real ship:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4qbmYWCbo8
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 11:48 am
by kevinkins
The troubled pantsir s1 in the news again. Going to degrade its capabilities in a test to see if a drone can take it out. With normal settings it's effective in CMO.
https://www.realcleardefense.com/articl ... 15394.html
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 1:53 pm
by Filitch
It's a rather one-sided article. There are 54 downed Turkay-made UAVs vs 6 or 9 destroyed Pantsirs. One Pantsir costs about $14 millons, and Bayraktar TB2 costs about $5 millions. As for me - Pantsirs won. This is only arithmetic. We will not remember about necessary of layered AD systems, right tactic, quality of personnel training and so on.
RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 2:25 pm
by Randomizer
An interesting read for those developing contemporary nuclear war CMO scenarios.
Revelations about Russia's Nuclear Deterrence Policy
For readers of Russian, the article provides links for the official Russian Government web page to download document in a handy *.pdf format.
-C