Page 23 of 39
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:31 pm
by KamilS
T57 center (German)
Unpleasant surprise - Infantry Corps and 2 divisions are encircled.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:35 pm
by KamilS
T57 south (German)
Isolated units were destroyed (9k - inf div and tank brig) and 4 more were surrounded.
Saper keeps applying pressure. River Don was crossed near Rostov and I won't be able to push him back or contain advancing panzers.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:37 pm
by KamilS
T57 far south (German)
I am surprised by German mobility once again. My positions are outflanked so another withdrawal will be necessary.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:05 pm
by KamilS
T57 center (Soviet)
Extremely successful counter-attacks near Moscow.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:08 pm
by KamilS
T57 south (Soviet)
Pocket was reopened and withdrawal continues.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:11 pm
by KamilS
T57 far south (Soviet)
More and more ground given. A bit historic.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:28 pm
by M60A3TTS
Nice defense of Moscow. Meanwhile Stalingrad beckons. Will Saper be able to resist?
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:14 pm
by sillyflower
and you are using your corps to chew up his mobile forces at an impressive rate which he can't sustain - and that's without knowing what he's losing in his turn.
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:55 pm
by KamilS
sillyflower
and you are using your corps to chew up his mobile forces at an impressive rate which he can't sustain - and that's without knowing what he's losing in his turn.
Since Saper abandoned concept of attacking with all panzers in one place I can counter-attack without compromising my defenses.
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:57 pm
by KamilS
T58 north (German)
I need to do something in far north otherwise it might get messy there.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:58 pm
by KamilS
T58 center (German)
Stable situation here.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:59 pm
by KamilS
T58 south (German)
I think Saper will not push towards Stalingrad. Readjustments will be necessary.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:04 pm
by KamilS
T58 far south (German)
Another prove of my stupidity.
Losing Novorossiysk cut off sea contact with Sevastopol (I forgot about port rules) and doomed my troops in Crimea - 9 infantry division plus 1 tank brigade - 84k soldiers.
Bad, bad, bad ...

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:27 pm
by bigbaba
arg, it's realy time for mud.[X(] i realy hope you can hold moscow. i would say that's the difference between a lost game and a russian offensive in the next year. after all there are around 160 manpower centers around moscow.
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:29 pm
by KamilS
T58 far north (Soviet)
I reinforced area a bit, but I fear it might not be enough.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:30 pm
by KamilS
T58 center (Soviet)
Battle for Moscow continues. This turn was very very good.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:35 pm
by KamilS
T58 south (Soviet)
I abandoned upper Don bulge plus stretched front in Tambov area to reinforced my lines further south.
Near Rostov I managed to reestablish contact with encircled units. Crucial factor was air-base providing air-head supply to my encircled divisions.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:36 pm
by KamilS
T58 far south (Soviet)
I am waiting.
Amphibious assault on Novorossiysk was obviously unsuccessful.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:30 pm
by Peltonx
The Finnish attack is just what you want. They be worthless after 4 to 6 turns of combat.
You Moscow defences look good. GHC can take it IF they set up 1 infantry army the right way, but if they don't I beleive you can hold it for now.
The south is the key, I like how you have stuff set-up and are sucking him into the deep south. GHC just plain cant hold a front that long.
Game is still up for grabs.
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:42 am
by KamilS
T59 far north (German)
Fins are getting more and more active.
