Page 23 of 37

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 4:48 pm
by loki100
Those units will be the Siberian transfers. It seems that the better you are doing the later they appear.


One possible problem - in my last game I was really confident at this stage but the germans seem to have a very good 1942 coded for them.

Remains a gem of an a aar

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 4:49 pm
by warspite1
25th March 1942

Wow - when the good weather comes back and aircraft can fly, its really painful!


RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 6:48 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: loki100

Those units will be the Siberian transfers. It seems that the better you are doing the later they appear.


One possible problem - in my last game I was really confident at this stage but the germans seem to have a very good 1942 coded for them.

Remains a gem of an a aar
warspite1

Agreed - that is why I have been slow to take offensive action in both the desert and here. As said last turn I have started to move forward but I think I need to halt that. Daugvapils came within a whisker of falling.....

Thanks for the warning.

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 6:49 pm
by warspite1
25th March 1942

In Yugoslavia a partisan is destroyed.

In the Southwestern Approaches one U-Boat withdraws, but the other sticks around and pays for that decision. Unless he dives and evades, he will have three destroyer flotillas on his case next turn.

In Egypt the pressure remains piled on - the RAF are struggling to cope even with the higher numbers of fighters and bombers. If the Italian infantry had performed better the town of El-Alamein would now be in the hands of the Axis.

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:00 pm
by warspite1
25th March 1942

The Germans, having re-opened the convoy route to Finland, lose another 11 MPP.

With the coming of spring, aircraft are no longer grounded, and German pressure on the Dvina remains intense. The Soviet air force will need to retreat. Apart from bringing units up to strength, I do not intend to commit any further reserves to this sector and will instead concentrate on Parnu-Tartu-Pskov-Ostrov for my next line of defence.

At least, should it be necessary, this time around Leningrad has a degree of protection from both north and south of the city.

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:22 pm
by warspite1
25th March 1942

The German plans north and east of Kiev grow ever stranger. The Soviet plan will be to try and ensure that the Germans cannot relieve the trapped forces (I am hoping that I can slowly reduce the pocket, but it does not look straightfoward based on projected nos.).

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:26 pm
by Orm
Isn't it time for the combined US and CW fleets to hunt down the Italian shipping in the Mediterranean?



RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:29 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Orm

Isn't it time for the combined US and CW fleets to hunt down the Italian shipping in the Mediterranean?


warspite1

No. The US Fleet will appear v.v. shortly [:)] - at which point all will become either:

a) very clear what the quality gameplan was, OR
b) confirmation (if any was needed) that I am to quality wargaming what Pearl Harbor is to serious historical drama.

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:38 pm
by warspite1
25th March 1942

One Corps only lost this turn. The Lower Dnepr does not worry me too much. There are choke points here even if the Germans get beyond the river. Further north, where the Germans are across, and firmly established, is more tricky as there are no further river lines unless I pull back to the Don - not something I want to do at this stage.

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 8:03 pm
by warspite1
5th April 1942

A costly operation, but given that the German fleet remains operational, a necessary one.

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 8:08 pm
by warspite1
5th April 1942

Reinforcements

United States
- Heavy Artillery (Norfolk)

Soviet Union
- 4 x Army (Gomel, Kursk, Zaporhyze, Stalino)
- 1 x Heavy Artillery (Gomel)

MPP Expenditure

UK - Advanced Aircraft research, Destroyer and a Garrison
USA - Diplomacy in Spain, Algeria and Tunisia (2 chits each) Patton
USSR - Rocket Artillery, Mchanised, 4 x Army, 1 x Corps, 2 x Garrison

Good. The British buy another load of rubbish they don't need instead of the actual country that wants them..... That'll help the position in Egypt enormously [8|]

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 8:13 pm
by warspite1
5th April 1942

One of the Wolf Packs that was causing mayhem in the Norwegian sea tries to get back to Germany using the comfort of Norwegian waters. The 16th and 3rd flotillas keep track of the pack, follow them to the entrance to one of the many fjords, corner them and sink each in turn.

The Wolf Pack caught in the Western Approaches is far luckier and receives only minor damage from three destroyer attacks.

Meanwhile the US Fleet and convoy is heading ever closer to the Eastern Meditteranean.....


Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 8:46 pm
by warspite1
27th April 1942

I won't use separate pictures for the Axis turn as this seemed to be something of a consolidation turn. There were attacks of course but I suspect most units were being rested for a big push once the weather is right.

There is no doubting the big news from the Pacific furreal do.


Four months ago on 7th December 1941 World War II started. Rafe McCawley has vowed to finish it.
Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:11 pm
by warspite1
27th April 1942

Good news from the Middle East. That frees up an army and a corps for use in the Western Desert.

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:13 pm
by warspite1
27th April 1942

File under S for Schmuck....[8|]

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:15 pm
by warspite1
27th April 1942

I vote Yes of course.

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:18 pm
by warspite1
27th April 1942

Reinforcements

Soviet Union


1 x Army - Belgorod
1 x Garrison - Bryansk
1 x Rocket Artillery - Gomel

MPP Expenditure

UK - All units possible in Egypt are reinforced
USA - Research Long Range Aircraft and Naval Weaponry
USSR - All units possible are upgraded to Infantry and Tanks 2

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:23 pm
by warspite1
27th April 1942

United Kingdom

There was no activity from the U-Boats this turn, although intelligence reports a wolf pack sighting off northwest Spain. This must have been a pack previously attacked as the surviving boats were quickly found by the 1st Escort Flotilla and sunk.

In Egypt its a consolidation turn - all MPP are used to reinforce the army and air force there.

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:44 pm
by warspite1
27th April 1942

Neither Riga nor Daugvapils were able to be brought fully up to strength. I fear the worst here.

Image

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:48 pm
by warspite1
27th April 1942

The breach between the two panzergruppen has been made wider but I still cannot break down the panzer unit that has been trapped now for about three turns. Not sure what the Germans have around Kiev to be honest....

Image