RE: Great Tides that Ebb and Flow: Apbarog (A) vs Walker (J) DBB-B Scen 28
Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2015 7:10 am
Dec 24, 1942
Solomon Is / Coral Sea / Papua
More Allied landings at Milne Bay as well as Vangunu, with various Allied TFs nosing around Tagula, Rossel Island etc. An effective tactic as my opponent clearly realises that I can't react everywhere at once.
The Allied carriers move closer to support the landings at Milne Bay.
Musings on carrier warfare in this game to date
A word about how my opponent uses his carriers. I have seen this throughout the recent Solomons campaign and now call it 'kitchen-sinking' his carriers. As far as I can tell from naval search, every single available carrier including the Brits always seems to be present in two main TFs. These TFs are well supported with BBs, CLAAs and DDs with powerful ASW capabilities. In the same hex there are also additional TFs - sometimes up to 8 more in total. The rationale as I see it is to protect his carriers, not only with a massive ASW concentration, but also by presenting multiple targets that could dilute any KB or LBA attack. (Although the game engine will tend to seek out the carriers, there's no guarantee of this afaik).
Why have I not been using the KB more aggressively in the Solomons? Well, point 1 is that even in Dec '42 I don't think I can quite match the scale of the formation that Apbarog has assembled as described above without LBA helping to tip the balance. The KB may have parity in terms of aircraft right now, but is clearly inferior in terms of numbers of ships deployed locally, and especially AAA as I found from the last inconclusive carrier battles we fought. Put simply, in a carrier battle, more of my bombers are going to get shot down than his so I need a numerical advantage to make a carrier battle worthwhile.
Point 2 is that, although I have been referring to the KB generically of late, nearly half of it has been under repair as a result of previous battle damage suffered. At the moment, Zuikaku still has 41 days until it is repaired, while Soryu, Zuiho, Shoho and Ryujo have only just departed Hiroshima and Kobe after their repairs.
So, lately I have been obliged to avoid a direct carrier battle unless within range of LBA support and have been looking for opportunities to counter-attack on the rebound. All credit to Apbarog as he is so thorough in his build-up that such chances are few indeed. I thought I saw just such an opportunity on Dec 25, 1942 and I will deal with the outcome in my next post...

Solomon Is / Coral Sea / Papua
More Allied landings at Milne Bay as well as Vangunu, with various Allied TFs nosing around Tagula, Rossel Island etc. An effective tactic as my opponent clearly realises that I can't react everywhere at once.
The Allied carriers move closer to support the landings at Milne Bay.
Musings on carrier warfare in this game to date
A word about how my opponent uses his carriers. I have seen this throughout the recent Solomons campaign and now call it 'kitchen-sinking' his carriers. As far as I can tell from naval search, every single available carrier including the Brits always seems to be present in two main TFs. These TFs are well supported with BBs, CLAAs and DDs with powerful ASW capabilities. In the same hex there are also additional TFs - sometimes up to 8 more in total. The rationale as I see it is to protect his carriers, not only with a massive ASW concentration, but also by presenting multiple targets that could dilute any KB or LBA attack. (Although the game engine will tend to seek out the carriers, there's no guarantee of this afaik).
Why have I not been using the KB more aggressively in the Solomons? Well, point 1 is that even in Dec '42 I don't think I can quite match the scale of the formation that Apbarog has assembled as described above without LBA helping to tip the balance. The KB may have parity in terms of aircraft right now, but is clearly inferior in terms of numbers of ships deployed locally, and especially AAA as I found from the last inconclusive carrier battles we fought. Put simply, in a carrier battle, more of my bombers are going to get shot down than his so I need a numerical advantage to make a carrier battle worthwhile.
Point 2 is that, although I have been referring to the KB generically of late, nearly half of it has been under repair as a result of previous battle damage suffered. At the moment, Zuikaku still has 41 days until it is repaired, while Soryu, Zuiho, Shoho and Ryujo have only just departed Hiroshima and Kobe after their repairs.
So, lately I have been obliged to avoid a direct carrier battle unless within range of LBA support and have been looking for opportunities to counter-attack on the rebound. All credit to Apbarog as he is so thorough in his build-up that such chances are few indeed. I thought I saw just such an opportunity on Dec 25, 1942 and I will deal with the outcome in my next post...

