RE: Nomonhan Redux: Seydlitz (Japan) vs. MBatch729 (Allies)
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:18 am
Here is the bomber pool:


What's your Strategy?
https://forums.matrixgames.com:443/




ORIGINAL: bklooste
Is a landing on the base 3 East of vladivostok viable ?



ORIGINAL: seydlitz
On the land side of things,
I captured both Georgetown and Taiping in Malaya this turn.
I continue bombardment attacks at Clark, Manila, Changsha, and Loyang.
Aircraft losses were relatively low.
I apologize for the short summary but I am trying a different screen capture program than previous and I am not very happy with it. Since the program that I liked has completed it's 30 free trial period I am trying to decide whether or not to purchase it or to use a different program. So far it looks like I may purchase it since it was very easy to use and I am not happy with some of the features of the other program that I am trying.
![]()
ORIGINAL: crsutton
Just got caught up on your AAR. Very fun to read. A few comments.
As an AFB, my holy grail would be to exchange pilots 1-1 with Japan early in the war. Seems like he is doing better as most of his air losses are over his own bases. And he is losing Russian pilots-not American or British. How are your replacments pilots looking?
With another massive land front how are you equipment and troop pools? Suppy pools?
Your opponent seems to be quite passive (cautious). He should have four American carriers now and by virtue of your required need to have KB in or near the Russian theater. Not to mention the KB pilot losses, I am surprised that he is not aggressively using his carriers somewhere. Normally, I am very cautious with my Allied carriers at this stage of the war, but only because of the threat KB poses. He knows where KB is and pretty much has to be for now, it is better than signet intel. Now is the time for him to poke you some where you are vulnerable. of course, I am not faulting his strategy as the "sit back and let the Russians soak up Japan" while the Americans grow strong is not a bad idea either.
What would you be doing different if you were the Allied player?
If you had been aware of the determental effects of the bad northern weather before embarking on this crusade-would you have tried it?
ORIGINAL: bklooste
ORIGINAL: crsutton
Just got caught up on your AAR. Very fun to read. A few comments.
As an AFB, my holy grail would be to exchange pilots 1-1 with Japan early in the war. Seems like he is doing better as most of his air losses are over his own bases. And he is losing Russian pilots-not American or British. How are your replacments pilots looking?
With another massive land front how are you equipment and troop pools? Suppy pools?
Your opponent seems to be quite passive (cautious). He should have four American carriers now and by virtue of your required need to have KB in or near the Russian theater. Not to mention the KB pilot losses, I am surprised that he is not aggressively using his carriers somewhere. Normally, I am very cautious with my Allied carriers at this stage of the war, but only because of the threat KB poses. He knows where KB is and pretty much has to be for now, it is better than signet intel. Now is the time for him to poke you some where you are vulnerable. of course, I am not faulting his strategy as the "sit back and let the Russians soak up Japan" while the Americans grow strong is not a bad idea either.
What would you be doing different if you were the Allied player?
If you had been aware of the determental effects of the bad northern weather before embarking on this crusade-would you have tried it?
I don't think the air losses are such a big deal since if the Russian gambit works he can sweep all those forces through China and then have all the Chinese /Manchuria LCU ( minus a few garrisons) and air forces working for him. He can rebuild his bombers and just use the fighters as cover as he will have superior numbers.
I agree KB needs to go somewhere else ( DEI or Rabaul)
I was thinking the same question on the weather but the Russian March re-reinforcement and later armout would make a later invasion even more difficult.
ORIGINAL: crsutton
Just got caught up on your AAR. Very fun to read. A few comments.
As an AFB, my holy grail would be to exchange pilots 1-1 with Japan early in the war. Seems like he is doing better as most of his air losses are over his own bases. And he is losing Russian pilots-not American or British. How are your replacments pilots looking?
With another massive land front how are you equipment and troop pools? Suppy pools?
Your opponent seems to be quite passive (cautious). He should have four American carriers now and by virtue of your required need to have KB in or near the Russian theater. Not to mention the KB pilot losses, I am surprised that he is not aggressively using his carriers somewhere. Normally, I am very cautious with my Allied carriers at this stage of the war, but only because of the threat KB poses. He knows where KB is and pretty much has to be for now, it is better than signet intel. Now is the time for him to poke you some where you are vulnerable. of course, I am not faulting his strategy as the "sit back and let the Russians soak up Japan" while the Americans grow strong is not a bad idea either.
What would you be doing different if you were the Allied player?
If you had been aware of the determental effects of the bad northern weather before embarking on this crusade-would you have tried it?