Page 250 of 325

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2023 3:40 am
by CaptBeefheart
Ouch on that surface action.

Still, looking at the loss sheet, you are not doing badly. A good chunk of his CAs are resting in Davey Jones's locker, which could be why we haven't seen the KB so much--lack of good escorts.

Not sure when you plan to invade Luzon, but one place I like to land is Batangas, as there's usually not much there and it's close to Manila. You can drop a lot of naval support at the base and some support ships and use it to pummel Manila (if Bataan isn't laden with CDs--best to run some expendable ships at Manila first).

Cheers,
CB

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2023 9:58 pm
by Lowpe
July 31, 1943

Sank at least Iboats, damaged several others some severely. Our subs scored once...but missed a really big girl.
a.jpg
a.jpg (271.68 KiB) Viewed 1329 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2023 10:08 pm
by Lowpe
Big map! :D
a.jpg
a.jpg (522.62 KiB) Viewed 1324 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2023 10:10 pm
by Lowpe
Air losses....unescorted Lilly DBs go down...
a.jpg
a.jpg (96.83 KiB) Viewed 1322 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2023 10:33 pm
by BBfanboy
His air losses are almost exactly 50% more than yours. That is a huge disparity. Well done!

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2023 2:01 pm
by Lowpe
BBfanboy wrote: Fri Apr 14, 2023 10:33 pm His air losses are almost exactly 50% more than yours. That is a huge disparity. Well done!
Yes, I have targeted Japanese AF pretty well. Bombardments, bombing, CAP, LRCAP and sweeps. Varying pressure to keep his planes bouncing around from one damaged runway to the next.

Only made a few mistakes.

Also, I think PDU off give the early advantage to the Allies here.

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2023 2:03 pm
by Lowpe
CaptBeefheart wrote: Fri Apr 14, 2023 3:40 am Ouch on that surface action.

Still, looking at the loss sheet, you are not doing badly. A good chunk of his CAs are resting in Davey Jones's locker, which could be why we haven't seen the KB so much--lack of good escorts.

Not sure when you plan to invade Luzon, but one place I like to land is Batangas, as there's usually not much there and it's close to Manila. You can drop a lot of naval support at the base and some support ships and use it to pummel Manila (if Bataan isn't laden with CDs--best to run some expendable ships at Manila first).

Cheers,
CB
Always knew there would be losses....but we are in position to cut off Japanese oil a year early but overall the idea is to collapse within range of Honshu before Japan gets their 44 reinforcements.

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 11:21 am
by Lowpe
Aug 1, 1943

A new month rolls in, the war is running by and I feel like I am too slow...this month a lot of low production Chinese frames and some British come in. Next month is the B24J! :)

Prepping for lots of bases that touch the South China Seas or the coastal waters around Singers and Kuching and Soc Trang.

Got at least one Iboat, two Es...establishing our submarine net and invaded Brunei which seems very lightly held.

Vinh will hold for quite a while...it even gets regular supply from Quinhon and is set to stockpile. Some mines will arrive in a day or two plus more troops even AA plus Forts are 1+. This must have been an unpleasant surprise for Japan.

Amphibious Assault at Brunei (65,87)

TF 354 troops unloading over beach at Brunei, 65,87

Allied ground losses:
83 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 37 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 6 (0 destroyed, 6 disabled)
Vehicles lost 1 (0 destroyed, 1 disabled)
a.jpg
a.jpg (764.38 KiB) Viewed 1153 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 11:43 am
by Lowpe
Our long supply line....
a.jpg
a.jpg (563.22 KiB) Viewed 1148 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 12:02 am
by Lowpe
Aug 2, 1943

Quiet day...might have sunk an Iboat. Missed a tanker twice...but took Brunei which will be a major staging base.

Probably going to detour west to Singkawang area to further gain intel on IJN shipping in the South China Sea...or Soc Trang or even Mersing.

IJN bombards Quinhon for the first time....hoping our submarines can score against his ships.
a.jpg
a.jpg (661.26 KiB) Viewed 1009 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 12:14 am
by RangerJoe
Did you forget to lay mines at Quinhon?

With that moonlight, how about PT Boats as well?

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 11:37 am
by Lowpe
More mines arrive today and more PT boats....two squadrons worth. But Japan has minesweepers and their own MTBs present.

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 11:48 am
by Lowpe
Washington is in one of those really large floating docks at Tabby....I guess I forgot that changing priority does effect ships in ARDs.
a.jpg
a.jpg (215.78 KiB) Viewed 962 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 12:09 pm
by BBfanboy
Nice to get Brunei! How much fuel did you capture there? Getting a fuel-producing port on the South China Sea is golden! ("Black gold, that is ... Texas Tea ..." - the Beverley Hillbillies).

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 12:31 pm
by Lowpe
BBfanboy wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 12:09 pm Nice to get Brunei! How much fuel did you capture there? Getting a fuel-producing port on the South China Sea is golden! ("Black gold, that is ... Texas Tea ..." - the Beverley Hillbillies).
Not much fuel...the standard stockpile for a port with no ships based there. No refinery at Brunei.

Brunei....best port on Borneo, and will be a decent airbase in less than two weeks, will shut down Miri as a fuel supply source for Japan and be a great staging base/port.

Amazing success for moving fast....I will get recon on western Borneo and see what we see.
a.jpg
a.jpg (222.7 KiB) Viewed 944 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 12:51 pm
by Lowpe
The plus side of losing ships is less clicks and there are far too many clicks each turn.
a.jpg
a.jpg (534.71 KiB) Viewed 936 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2023 3:52 pm
by Lowpe
Aug 3, 1943

Some sub and PT boat engagements around Quinhon...heavy fires the ship is doomed. Mutsu bombards Quinhon meaning Japan is far behind in CV production.
a.jpg
a.jpg (448.79 KiB) Viewed 853 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2023 4:01 pm
by Lowpe
Brunei buildup progressing.
a.jpg
a.jpg (610.84 KiB) Viewed 848 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2023 4:17 pm
by Lowpe
Quinhon:
a.jpg
a.jpg (322.37 KiB) Viewed 845 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2023 4:29 pm
by RangerJoe
If he keeps bombarding Quinhon, then a fast carrier strike with lots of Avengers with torpedoes could be rather productive. Dive bombers for scouting and extra fighters for defense. :twisted: