Matrix Games Forums

ORIGINAL: Titanwarrior89

The Bible[&o]

Who wrote it?

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

Who wrote it?

We're all going to find out soon.
[:D]

ORIGINAL: Titanwarrior89

Amen....to Parusski GOD![&o][X(][;)]

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

Who wrote it?

We're all going to find out soon.
[:D]

Who puts their bachelor's degrees earned on the front cover of a book? Is that a selling point?

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11

nelmsm

parusski

Wow, that's a lot of books to be reading at the moment...

They went up you butt.

The Project for a New American Century
That brings us to the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), the neo-conservative Washington-based organization funded by three foundations closely tied to Persian Gulf oil, weapons and defense industries, whose plan "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces and Resources for a New Century," was completed in Septemer 2000. It outlined a plan for world military domination, which we now see beginning to play out. The plan called for an attack on Iraq, whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power, in order to solidify a power base in the Middle East.

The plan was drawn up for Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), George W's younger brother Jeb and Lewis "Scooter" Libby (Cheney's chief of staff).

"Rebuilding America's Defenses" said that the desired military build-up needed an attack on America to kick it off. "The process of transformation," the plan said almost wistfully, "is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event-like a new Pearl Harbor."

The American Free Press asked Christopher Maletz, assistant director of the PNAC about what they meant by the need for "a new Pearl Harbor."

Maletz answered, "They needed more money to up the defense budget for raises, new arms, and future capabilities. Without some disaster or catastrophic event" neither the politicians nor the military would have gone along.

As George W. Bush's former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill recently revealed in The Price of Loyalty by Ron Suskind, attacking Iraq was the administration's raison d'etre "from Day One." The PNAC document makes it clear that the real meaning of Iraq to the elites of the PNAC was to use it as a base for its planned domination of the Middle East and its oil.

"Rebuilding America's Defenses" makes it clear: "The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."

The National Security Strategy
In September 2002, the plan of the Project for a New American Century became the official policy of the United States when the Bush administration presented its paper "The National Security Strategy of the United States of America" to Congress. The presentation of an annual statement of foreign strategy is mandated by a law passed in 1986.

The plan stated that the U.S. will not allow any other country to build up a military capability that could threaten U.S. superiority. It proclaimed that the U.S. has the right to strike pre-emptively at any country it deems a threat. (See the Washington Post. See also "Exposing the PNAC")

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Who puts their bachelor's degrees earned on the front cover of a book? Is that a selling point? [&:]

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11

warspite1

No no no Mr S [:-][:-]. I watched one of your 9/11 videos the other day and was reliably informed that there were NO planes. So what are we talking here in this book? There were planes with no passengers? There were no planes with no passengers? There were no planes with passengers? WTF? Oh I no...there WERE PLANES WITH PASSENGERS..yes that's it! I knew we'd get there eventually [:)]