Page 27 of 39
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:11 pm
by larryfulkerson
Here's some of the Soviet losses and the production figures for turn 90:

RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:15 pm
by larryfulkerson
Hopefully, turn 90 is the last turn of the mud season and we can start the war again on turn 91. Not much happened lately, I've been moving units around, digging troops in deeper, etc. I think I'm ready for the German summer '42 assaults. I think. Here's the minimap moves movie from turns 86 throu 90:

RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:49 pm
by Zort
Karri, how hurting are you? Heck on turn 93 you get 1 pzd and 5 inf divs, a super attack force. If you get a chance it would be nice to see some of your losses, not all. And we can keep a secret, where are you going to attack?
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:28 pm
by Karri
Well, I'm going on a vacation and will be off the internet starting tomorrow so the losses, etc. need to wait after that. Heavy rifle squads stand at about 49 000 lost and 42 000 assigned, as normal I have none as replacements. Lot's of artillery in replacement poll, same with armored cars, tanks I don't have that many and Luftwaffe seems to have disappeared.
Now since Larry withdrew quite a lot, I have some problem deciding where to attack...and the supply problems worry me a lot, I don't want to get hit by a counter-offensive.
Let's just say Leningrad and Moscow are both my targets, but when, where and how hard I strike remains to be seen.
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:48 pm
by SMK-at-work
What's happening down at Astrakhan on the Caspian sea?? It seems to have been surrounded for quiet a while now....
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:41 am
by larryfulkerson
ORIGINAL: SMK-at-work
What's happening down at Astrakhan on the Caspian sea?? It seems to have been surrounded for quiet a while now....
I haven't decided whether or not to attack the Germans there....let sleeping dogs lay is my stance I guess.
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:28 am
by SMK-at-work
Ah...the secret nexus of your masterful counter-attack huh?? OK - I'll stay mum.....[;)][:D][8D]
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:18 pm
by Karri
Astrkhan has a supplu source and I don't feel like committing more troops there to break the stalemate.
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:35 pm
by larryfulkerson
Here's some more END_OF_TURN files in case anybody wanted to download them and look around :
turn 88:
http://www.zshare.net/download/223522584c99c6/
turn 89:
http://www.zshare.net/download/2235232ea04573/
RE: Soviet turn 91
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 5:53 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's the Soviet view of the minimap moves movie for turns 87 thru 91:

RE: Soviet turn 91
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 5:57 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's some of the Soviet losses so far:

RE: Soviet turn 91
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 6:10 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's the north half of the front lines in Soviet turn 91:

RE: Soviet turn 91
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 6:23 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's part of the south half of the front lines in turn 91:

RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:41 pm
by sPzAbt653
Doesn't it seem wrong that Astrakhan could be surrounded and hold out for so long? I don't think any city could hold out indefinately.
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 3:11 pm
by Veers
If it wasn't attacked it might.
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 3:25 pm
by LLv34_Snefens
Exactly.
Dunkirk, St. Nazaire and other of the atlantic ports come to mind.
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 4:09 pm
by Karri
But it's not a port...
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 4:38 pm
by Veers
Aye, but those ports also weren't being resupplied by sea, so the fact that they were ports makes no differance. They were just well stocked.
RE: Soviet turn 90
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 5:04 pm
by sPzAbt653
I think Karri is not attacking it because it is supplied and the losses outway the gains. Attacking any of the 'hold out' cities would use up the stocks quickly. Cherbourg was needed by the Allies so they attacked and the fortress was overcome because it couldn't resupply. Leningrad didn't fall because it still had a supply link over Lake Ladoga.
RE: Soviet turn 92
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 3:56 am
by larryfulkerson
The Soviet dude ( me ) gained a few hexes from vicious attacks this turn. Here's some hexes gained in Lapland:
