Matrix Games Forums

Weapon_299 NAVAL STRIKE MISSILE It can only attack surface ships in the latest database, in real life it can attack land targets:

Logged and fixed in next DB3K release.

-WS

Not sure if the British Type 31 frigate (entering service c. 2023) has been requested yet, but here is some information...

https://news.usni.org/2019/09/23/arrowh ... ompetition

(includes information on weapons, range, displacement, sensors, etc.)

USAF make a contract with Northrop Grumman.
They will receive 372 AN/APG-83 SABR for F-16.
And is expected to be completed by May 2027).

https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Contra ... /2044738//

AEGIS Ashore (Japan/2022)
1xSPY-7(SSR/similar tech as SPY-6)
3x 8 cell VLS with SM-3blk2A
https://www.army-technology.com/news/lo ... ore-japan/
https://www.naval-technology.com/news/u ... n-spy-7v1/

J/FPS-7(Japan/2016/BMD)
Cost down version of J/FPS-5.ABM and space search capable
expect early 2010 technology
https://www.mod.go.jp/e/d_budget/pdf/251009.pdf (P15)

New Bomb (GBU-39 SDB #484) for F-15K #4514
also suggest new F-15K SDB-I (2013ver)



GBU-39 SDB #484
after bombardment of yeonpyeong in 2010, ROKAF Listed GBU-39 to Emergency Force Requirement list
and later, First GBU-39 was spotted in 2013 Cheongju Airshow and also 2014 Cheongju Airshow


(Picture from 2013 Cheongju Airshow, Source : https://wkfyd0188.blog.me/150181144825)

in 2015, ROKAF Showed up the Live fire of GBU-39


(Image from ROKAF's video, Source : https://youtu.be/cNQjY50IJJw?t=26


Loadout Config should be following same with F-15E SDB Loadout atm i guess
also GBU-39 Should be add to #4224 F-35A

Yes, please, to everyone using this forum...the developers will look at your suggestions, and they will take care of database errors, but they've got a lot on their plates. Please be patient. They do take what we say seriously, but sometimes it takes a while for a fix or a new platform to make it into the database.

ORIGINAL: stilesw

And what about radars on Kashins?

Hey Ivan,

Not to worry it's in my "Get to It" folder but not at the top yet.

-WS

Weapon:DBID3540
HYDRA APKWS can shoot down air targets

https://defense-update.com/20191224_apk ... ssile.html

HYDRA APKWS can shoot down air targets

Thanks, logged.

-WS

Russia Nanuchka III update 2019 (db #1101)

16x SS-N-25 replace 6x SS-N-9

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... siles-gun/

#4429 - SV-22D Osprey(2018, USN) loadouts error

DBID:SHIP2927 Type 903A has serious problem on the fuel data. Type 903A is AOE, however, it can only moves 4 hour for now.

Possible database error...

#2358 Factory Trawler
Based on how long these ships typically stay out, and how far out they go, the fuel should be 60 tons rather than 12 tons. This would increase the range so that these very large trawlers can reach remote spots in the ocean.

Thanks for considering this.

#2358 Factory Trawler
Based on how long these ships typically stay out, and how far out they go, the fuel should be 60 tons rather than 12 tons. This would increase the range so that these very large trawlers can reach remote spots in the ocean.

Mark,
You are likely correct. Logged for update.
BTW, I assume this is the same as requested for #2117 Factory Trawler since the #2117 DB entry is for USN's "PC 1 Cyclone".

-WS

Yes, thanks. As far as I can tell, the information for #2117 is for the Factory Trawler, but the image is for the Cyclone.

ORIGINAL: stilesw

#2358 Factory Trawler
Based on how long these ships typically stay out, and how far out they go, the fuel should be 60 tons rather than 12 tons. This would increase the range so that these very large trawlers can reach remote spots in the ocean.

Mark,
You are likely correct. Logged for update.
BTW, I assume this is the same as requested for #2117 Factory Trawler since the #2117 DB entry is for USN's "PC 1 Cyclone".

-WS

So, there I was, minding my own business, roughing up an idea for a scenario involving the Royal Bahamas Defence Force (yes, apparently, that's how they spell it), only to discover (gasp!) that there are no entries for the Royal Bahamas Defence Force!

The Bahamas actually has a pretty impressive navy for a small country. Please consider adding it.

A basic overview can be found here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Bah ... ence_Force (I've attached a partial screen shot showing ship names, etc.)

https://idsa.in/idsacomments/royal-baha ... raj_301116 <-- includes a bit of history and commission dates

https://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2013/06/ ... dy-bottom/

Here is what I could find out about the four classes listed (sorry...I couldn't find very much)...

Bahamas Class

https://en.wikipedi0.org/wiki/HMBS_Bahamas_(P-60)

http://www.tribune242.com/news/2016/aug ... set-refit/

https://www.damen.com/en/news/2016/08/b ... _extension

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military ... zation.htm

https://navaltoday.com/2018/10/29/corve ... -overhaul/

Legend Class

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damen_Sta ... rol_vessel

https://www.defensemedianetwork.com/sto ... 7-vessels/

HMBS Lawrence Major

(this vessel should be able to carry cargo)

https://en.wikipedi0.org/wiki/HMBS_Lawrence_Major

https://en.wikipedi0.org/wiki/Damen_Stan_Lander_5612

https://www.naval-technology.com/projec ... rt-vessel/


Damen Stan 3007 Class (apparently known as the "Sea Axe")

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damen_Sta ... rol_vessel

https://products.damen.com/en/ranges/st ... atrol-3007

https://products.damen.com/-/media/Prod ... 1_2015.PDF

https://products.damen.com/-/media/Prod ... ea_Axe.pdf

https://products.damen.com/-/media/Prod ... andard.pdf

(I'm not sure if this class is armed...but it does carry a RHIB, which could be armed.) I suppose small arms carried by the crew could be simulated with a 7.62mm machine gun?

Why F-35C Lightning II 2028 (#4874) can't mount JATM missile?

2025 F-35C can mount with JATM x6 missiles, But F-35C(2025) had been omitted JSOW-ER in Aircraft Stores/Loadouts.

The #1322 PL-2a and #1047 PL-2b have an incorrect maximum and minimum range, minimum target altitude (in the case of the PL-2b), top speed, weight (in the case of the PL-2a), and POH value (in the case of the PL-2b.)

The top speed for the #1322 PL-2a should be 1538.877 knots while the #1047 PL-2b should have a top speed of 1666.85 knots.

The minimum target altitude for the #1047 PL-2b should be 300 meters (984.252 feet.)

The #1322 PL-2a should have a minimum range of 0.81 nautical miles (1.5 kilometers) and a maximum range of 3.50972 nautical miles (6.5 kilometers) while the #1047 PL-2b should have a minimum range of 0.70 nautical miles (1.3 kilometers) and a maximum range of 5.39957 nautical miles (10 kilometers.)

The #1322 PL-2a should weigh only 60 kilograms and the #1047 PL-2b should have a measurably better (15-20 percent more) POH value than the baseline PL-2a (as the PL-2b variant specifically had its seeker head, proximity detonator, and electrical equipment upgraded to counter the lackluster abilities of the PL-2a; currently the POH for both missiles are identical.)

Sources: https://www.globalsecurity.org/military ... a/aa-2.htm and https://books.google.com/books?id=g3yND ... le&f=false

Could we have the Canadian type 26 added as Hypothetical ?
It's not hypothetical but not all the systems are decided yet I believe.
Thanks !

Radar
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/frigat ... -1.5407226
Other info
http://www.navalreview.ca/2018/02/futur ... ly-option/
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/2 ... -26-design

https://defpost.com/ultra-electronics-s ... c-program/

https://defpost.com/mda-to-provide-desi ... are-suite/

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=ca ... &FORM=VIRE

I think there is enough here to piece together a close Hypothetical ?

And the following Ship for Canada - Thanks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Asteri ... vy_service