Page 28 of 39
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:13 pm
by KamilS
T67 far south-west (German)
Steady advance of Italian mountain units.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:17 pm
by KamilS
T67 far south-east (German)
Every time I recollect Saper summer offensive of '42 my self-esteem suffer another mighty blow.
Overall Axis captured 105k prisoners, destroying 1 cav corps, 1 tank corps, 9 inf divisions and 3 mot brigades.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:34 pm
by KamilS
T67 center (Soviet)
Necessary withdrawal.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:35 pm
by KamilS
T67 far south-west (Soviet)
Necessary adjustments.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:36 pm
by KamilS
T67 far south-east (Soviet)
Knowing how weak Saper's panzerwaffe is I decided to put some pressure on German forces assaulting Caucasus.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:52 pm
by KamilS
T68 center (German)
During the course of heavy fighting (my troops did fight well) Saper managed to form little pocket.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:55 pm
by KamilS
T68 far south-east (German)
It turned out that Germans are not as weak as I thought ...
This is even more tragic than previous encirclements. 4 guard cavalry corps - morale 60, 61, 61, 62.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:32 pm
by M60A3TTS
Very bad for the cavalry, but you risk losing the war if you don't get out of that useless chunk of real estate that you're sitting in. He can refit his panzers during the rainy season in preparation for a winter offensive to try and trap many of those rifle divisions sitting in the open.
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:51 pm
by hfarrish
I am more interested in how we got to this point - Kamil, is it a lack of units or a lack of manpower or both? Do you mind posting some pool / force level / production pics so we can get a sense?
Amazed at what kind of distances off of rail heads the Germans are able to romp around down there. Scary.
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:14 pm
by KamilS
M60A3TTS
Very bad for the cavalry, but you risk losing the war if you don't get out of that useless chunk of real estate that you're sitting in. He can refit his panzers during the rainy season in preparation for a winter offensive to try and trap many of those rifle divisions sitting in the open.
yeah, it will be done, finally
hfarrish
I am more interested in how we got to this point - Kamil, is it a lack of units or a lack of manpower or both? Do you mind posting some pool / force level / production pics so we can get a sense?
Data is on previous page.
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:22 pm
by gingerbread
ORIGINAL: hfarrish
...
Amazed at what kind of distances off of rail heads the Germans are able to romp around down there. Scary.
I don't think the distance is that wide - check the T56 screen shot (
link) and count 40-45 hexes from there. Should be well over the Kuma.
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:23 pm
by hfarrish
Got it - thanks. Any sense as to why you have a 300k manpower pool sitting around? Also, what is your AP and reserve situation?
Very instructive for me in my current game so the posts are very much appreciated.
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:31 pm
by KamilS
hfarrish
Got it - thanks. Any sense as to why you have a 300k manpower pool sitting around? Also, what is your AP and reserve situation?
Shifting troops and creating inf corps for counter-attacking purposes uses up almost whole AP. I practically didn't build any units. Few mot brigades and cav divisions.
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:31 pm
by hfarrish
That's still 450 miles from rail...not saying there is anything wrong, just amazed at what the Germans can accomplish without HQ BUs down there - granted the forces they are facing are pretty weak.
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:33 pm
by KamilS
T68 far south-west (Soviet)
New threat arises in central part of Caucasus. Unfortunately I do not have enough units to contain it.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:35 pm
by KamilS
T68 far south-east (Soviet)
Ring of encirclement was broken, but chances of rescuing trapped units are very low.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:53 pm
by KamilS
T69 center (German)
Last turn of summer. summer of terrible defeats.
Encircled units were destroyed. Another 4 inf divisions lost, not mentioning 1 air brigade.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:55 pm
by KamilS
T69 far south-west (German)
Saper keeps applying pressure.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:57 pm
by KamilS
T69 far south-east (German)
Bridgeheads were lost and cavalry was herded further south. Zero chances of mounting successful rescue operation.

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:16 am
by hfarrish
At this point should you just pull those units back to the Volga? There really isn't anything to defend anymore, and I guess the far South has to fend for itself - maybe you can use naval transport from Astrakhan to send additional units once you fall back?