Page 275 of 788

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:14 pm
by Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: USS America

ORIGINAL: sprior

ORIGINAL: CT Grognard

That is bizarre.

Do you think it might have anything to do with the HQ it's attached to?

No, it's because they're gits.

What version are you guys playing with? I'm pretty sure this is a bug that Michael M has fixed in one of the beta builds. One LCU would hoard all the unloaded supply during amphib landings.

D'oh!

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:15 pm
by sprior
ORIGINAL: USS America

ORIGINAL: sprior

ORIGINAL: CT Grognard

That is bizarre.

Do you think it might have anything to do with the HQ it's attached to?

No, it's because they're gits.

What version are you guys playing with? I'm pretty sure this is a bug that Michael M has fixed in one of the beta builds. One LCU would hoard all the unloaded supply during amphib landings.

We're playing the last vanilla patch. There's a rumour we're going to patch up to the latest beta.

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:24 pm
by Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: sprior

ORIGINAL: CT Grognard

That is bizarre.

Do you think it might have anything to do with the HQ it's attached to?

No, it's because they're gits.

Is "gits" a four letter word?

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:38 pm
by witpqs
ORIGINAL: sprior
ORIGINAL: USS America
ORIGINAL: sprior



No, it's because they're gits.

What version are you guys playing with? I'm pretty sure this is a bug that Michael M has fixed in one of the beta builds. One LCU would hoard all the unloaded supply during amphib landings.

We're playing the last vanilla patch. There's a rumour we're going to patch up to the latest beta.

Yeah he fixed that one, and made tons of other fixes and improvements. Get thee to the latest Beta!!!

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:56 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: CT Grognard

That is bizarre.

Do you think it might have anything to do with the HQ it's attached to?

That is possible but, East Africa Brigade is also attached to a high order HQ.

It also seems odd that an engineer bn has 1/6 the assault power of the entire 32nd ID.

I am thinking there is a bad number somewhere.
Well, once you capture Port Hedland....erm...if you capture Port Hedland, all units should dump their excess into the town hex, no?

Oh. Since you have the turn back, how's Royal Sovereign looking? Rather in a permanently moistened state, I'd imagine?

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:58 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: sprior

ORIGINAL: CT Grognard

That is bizarre.

Do you think it might have anything to do with the HQ it's attached to?

No, it's because they're gits.

Is "gits" a four letter word?
Yes, so it's rude to use. I prefer to use the three letter word, mass applied. That's not a four letter word and, therefore, quite suitable for mixed company.

Try this instead: "The commander of the 102nd Engineer Regiment is a git and so are all the other officers of this unit."

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:00 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: sprior

We're playing the last vanilla patch.


Is this patch of vanilla on Ceylon? I think they grow a fair amount of it there. [&:]

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:03 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
one or more carriers may be out of torps.
+1. The Jap carriers only have sufficient torps for 1.5 days of AM/PM torpedo runs.

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:07 pm
by Cap Mandrake
I'll take one Beta Patch with a side of cheesey-hammy eggs.

In 3 days, RS had pumped out the after junior officer gym and grog room and was down to 92% flooding. Sadly, although the Coastal Commission was inclined to grant the museum and coastal battery license to RS, they were enjoined at the last minute by Friends of the Salwater Crocodile Society.

There is now a counter-proposal by Minderbinder/Cousteau, LLC

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:08 pm
by witpqs
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: sprior

We're playing the last vanilla patch.


Is this patch of vanilla on Ceylon? I think they grow a fair amount of it there. [&:]

No, poultry-brain, that means he's wearing a patch to quit his vanilla habit. Do I have to explain everything to you? [:'(]

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:38 pm
by Cap Mandrake
Those Vanilla Patches are dangerous. I think MJ OD'ed on them.

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:42 pm
by Cap Mandrake
******************Bridge of HMS Royal Sovereign, 12:15, October 12, 1942***************


Lookout: Torpedo in the water off starboard bow! Range 800 yds!


Captain: Ring up 1 1/2 knots! Come right 15 degrees!

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 4:50 pm
by Argos
Hmmm Vanilla Patches - isn't that what an ex-rapper calls his new drywall repair business/reality TV show? I pretty sure it’s only intellectually dangerous...

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 5:45 pm
by Chickenboy
(in sotto voce) -ding ding ding dinga da ding ding- "Ice ice baby...."

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:48 pm
by Grollub
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: sprior

ORIGINAL: CT Grognard

That is bizarre.

Do you think it might have anything to do with the HQ it's attached to?

No, it's because they're gits.

Is "gits" a four letter word?
Yes, but that's fixed in the beta.

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 9:36 pm
by Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: Grollub

Yes, but that's fixed in the beta.

How come everyone but Admiral Lord Sprior and I seem to know this?

NOW YOU TELL US!

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 9:48 pm
by Grollub
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

ORIGINAL: Grollub

Yes, but that's fixed in the beta.

How come everyone but Admiral Lord Sprior and I seem to know this?

NOW YOU TELL US!
Maybe you could use 'twat' instead?

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 9:51 pm
by Cap Mandrake
Brief time out from getting our arses handed to us.

So I have this 12 year old male patient who is just starting puberty and he happens to get the hives (itchy swollen skin rash that migrates). So his mom drags him to the walk-in and they give him some cream to assuage his (and her) concern.

BTW, his mom told us this story.


Well, as luck would have it, he has the hives on his groin.

His mom says "Mijo, let me poot on the cream"

Her son says, "OK mom but you have to close your eyes"

Time out. I know what you are thinking. 12 years old and his mom is going to rub cream on his unmentionables? Huh? I thought the same thing.

So junior takes a peak down into his BVD's and notes the hives have spread to his unit. His eyes get real big. He proclaims, "Oh, Mom, you are going to be SOOOOO proud of me. My pajarito has NEVER been this big." [:D][:D]

After she stops laughing she gives him the cream. "Poot on the cream yooself, Mijo."

Here is the deal. This kid is smart. He knows how things work. He was two steps ahead of his mom.



RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 9:52 pm
by Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: Grollub
Maybe you could use 'twat' instead?

I suppose that is another patch I don't know about?

RE: Allied TF Behaviour

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:26 pm
by Itdepends
Don't forget if you upgrade to the Beta you'll have to change your signature line to "Pretend I never read the release notes"

BTW greate AAR, very enjoyable and instructive way to demonstrate how to blight a war.