Page 283 of 291

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:03 am
by warspite1
A Spitfire (without the tactical factor) will go to the 0-box but nothing for the Pacific thank-you

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:13 am
by AllenK
The empty TRANS loads the ART from Shanghai and the task force stops in the China Sea 0-box.

A second task force of 3 CV and 4 CA also sails to China Sea. Still no intercept?

Image

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:18 am
by warspite1
No thank-you

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:31 am
by AllenK
The task force sails to South China Sea (I decline intercepts) where 2 CA's load the two Divs in the Philipines. It settles in the 3-box.

Four potential areas for naval combat.

Image

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:38 am
by AllenK
First up, the Norwegian Sea, where the Italians decide to have a go.

Searches: Axis 1, Allies 10.

The Italian wolf-pack reaches a perfect firing position and looses full spreads. Spotting the wakes, the escort charges in and does enough damage to force the subs from the fight (2 surprise points to reduce D to A).

Image

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:40 am
by AllenK
Then the torpedoes find their marks (rest of the points used to increase damage).

Image

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:49 am
by AllenK
The sub returns to Hamburg.

Next up, East Med.

The Italians don't add anything else. The Allies scramble the Spitfire to the 0-box.

Searches: Axis 7, Allies 9. No combat.

The Japanese decline the combats. However, the Allies could have a go in the South China Sea.

Image

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:50 am
by AllenK
Or the China Sea?

Image

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:54 am
by warspite1
Yes please. The Chinese would like to make a search

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:56 am
by AllenK
The P-40's begin searching.

A US PBY-5 can make up to the 4-box. Does it join in?

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:58 am
by warspite1
Yes to that too please - No.3 Box thank-you

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:01 am
by AllenK
The stage is nearly set. Do the Allies want to throw the subs in as well?


RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:05 am
by warspite1
No thank-you

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:09 am
by AllenK
The Japanese forces blunder about spending more time checking formations than looking for the enemy. The Allies on the other hand ...

Searches: Allied 2, Axis 10.

How do the Allies wish to play this.

Image

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:29 am
by warspite1
Sorry - give me 5 minutes and I'll be with you [8|]

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:37 am
by AllenK
No rush. I’ll be away from the computer for a while now as I’m at the garage waiting for car to be fixed.

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:38 am
by warspite1
Sorry guys. Can you select the 0-box only please (air combat - no points req'd) then use all surprise points to increase damage? Thank-you

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:39 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: AllenK

No rush. I’ll be away from the computer for a while now as I’m at the garage waiting for car to be fixed.
warspite1

Nice [&:] I hope it's not too expensive.....

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:41 am
by AllenK
About £300 but somewhat better than the £700 or so Ford would have charged [8|].

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:51 am
by cfinch
been reading your AARs for a while love them! i don't comment much but FORD got me - we had a fire truck that we had to replace in a hurry and ended up with a FORD, couldn't rid of it. When asked what the letters on the front meant the standard reply was Found On Road Dead...
Cheers