Page 290 of 473
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:16 pm
by Speedysteve
Fine in all seriousness. They were only hit due to previous damage (30ish range) - lots of sub transport missions for the past 4 months non-stop! Both will make port no problem, upgrade and be sinking meat ball pieces of crap soon[:)] Thanks for your concern though Bruce[;)]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:50 pm
by Mike Solli
ORIGINAL: BrucePowers
How are those subs doing that got whacked by 250KG bombs. [:D]
One will be a nice diving area for Japanese tourists after the war is over and the other is sucking sea water (or worse). [:D]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:51 pm
by Mike Solli
ORIGINAL: Speedy
Fine in all seriousness. They were only hit due to previous damage (30ish range) - lots of sub transport missions for the past 4 months non-stop! Both will make port no problem, upgrade and be sinking meat ball pieces of crap soon[:)] Thanks for your concern though Bruce[;)]
Uh, Speedy, we saw S-39 sink yesterday. [:'(] We'll take 'em, damaged or not.
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:52 pm
by Speedysteve
Yeah that was but that was already at 54/89 BEFORE you hit it. Dumbass![:'(]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:53 pm
by Mike Solli
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:53 pm
by USSAmerica
I love reading the phrase, "Combat Replays sent" in here, because it means the trash talking is about to commence. [8D]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:54 pm
by Speedysteve
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 6:54 pm
by niceguy2005
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:01 pm
by Mynok
ORIGINAL: USS America
I love reading the phrase, "Combat Replays sent" in here, because it means the trash talking is about to commence. [8D]
It's eerie I say, just eerie......[8|][:D]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:19 pm
by DuckofTindalos
You call this "trash talk"? Pffft, amateurs.[:'(]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:06 am
by rtrapasso
17 March 1942:
Ground combat at Nanchang
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 32584 troops, 156 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 707
Defending force 40711 troops, 169 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 882
Japanese max assault: 672 - adjusted assault: 168
Allied max defense: 931 - adjusted defense: 511
Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 1)
Japanese ground losses:
3454 casualties reported
Guns lost 35
Allied ground losses:
67 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
=========================
18 March 1942:
Ground combat at Nanchang
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 29383 troops, 162 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 878
Defending force 26984 troops, 104 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 414
Allied max assault: 903 - adjusted assault: 1042
Japanese max defense: 245 - adjusted defense: 165
Allied assault odds: 6 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
290 casualties reported
Guns lost 9
Allied ground losses:
342 casualties reported
Guns lost 13
Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!
----------------------------------------------
Thanks for visiting... i'll see you again real soon... [:'(]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:25 am
by niceguy2005
[:D] Robert, maybe you should give them a parting gift for being such good sports. [;)]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:30 am
by rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: niceguy2005
[:D] Robert, maybe you should give them a parting gift for being such good sports. [;)]
Well, i had planned on giving them a 21 gun salute with 105s, but they left too soon... [:(]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:22 am
by USSAmerica
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
17 March 1942:
Ground combat at Nanchang
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 32584 troops, 156 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 707
Defending force 40711 troops, 169 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 882
Japanese max assault: 672 - adjusted assault: 168
Allied max defense: 931 - adjusted defense: 511
Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 1)
Japanese ground losses:
3454 casualties reported
Guns lost 35
Allied ground losses:
67 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
=========================
18 March 1942:
Ground combat at Nanchang
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 29383 troops, 162 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 878
Defending force 26984 troops, 104 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 414
Allied max assault: 903 - adjusted assault: 1042
Japanese max defense: 245 - adjusted defense: 165
Allied assault odds: 6 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
290 casualties reported
Guns lost 9
Allied ground losses:
342 casualties reported
Guns lost 13
Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!
----------------------------------------------
Thanks for visiting... i'll see you again real soon... [:'(]
Nicely done, Bob. [8D]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:40 am
by fabertong
Where is Bob now..........he owes me money.......
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:23 am
by BrucePowers
I have Bob as of right now. If I knew he owed you money, I would have sent him packing yesterday[:D]
Not really, after being sick and on second shift this week I did not have time for Bob yesterday.
Faber you and I probably need to do Mike's part of the turn but let's wait a bit on that to see if we hear from him.
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:26 am
by BrucePowers
You know Faber, you, Mike and I don't get any respect around here. No one congratulates us on our brilliant successes
[:D]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:07 pm
by rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: BrucePowers
You know Faber, you, Mike and I don't get any respect around here. No one congratulates us on our brilliant successes
[:D]
You need to have more JFBs hanging around here... oh, yeah, and more brilliant successes! [:'(]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:08 pm
by BrucePowers
We just don't get no respect[:D]
RE: One year of BOB
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:39 pm
by rtrapasso
We joke because we can.., er, i mean... because we care!! [:'(]
