Page 30 of 101
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:38 am
by Spidery
Wonderful idea with the mines south of Tulagi!
During the action off Noumea I had a chance to use mines but didn't have any to hand. Now my policy is that every time I-121, 122, 123, or 124 start a patrol I set them into a mine-laying task force and load up, just in case I get an opportunity to use them.
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:37 pm
by Spidery
September 19th 1942
Air Losses: 2 Japanese, 3 Allied, 0 Pilots
Japanese occupy:
Allies occupy:
Japanese land at:
Allies land at:
Pacific
A couple of ineffective ASW attacks, otherwise quiet.
Burma
Quiet
China
A good result outside Chungking[:)]
Japanese ground losses:
1268 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 102 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Guns lost 13 (3 destroyed, 10 disabled)
Vehicles lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
8648 casualties reported
Squads: 317 destroyed, 26 disabled
Non Combat: 499 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 14 (8 destroyed, 6 disabled)
Units retreated 6
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!
Assaulting units:
116th Division
13th Division
104th Division
21st Medium Field Artillery Battalion
3rd Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
11th Army
28th Mountain Gun Regiment
7th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
11th Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
10th Mortar Battalion
Defending units:
72nd Chinese Corps
4th Chinese Corps
26th Chinese Corps
74th Chinese Corps
15th Group Army
30th Group Army
That is another Chinese Corps trashed, I have lost count of the number.
Also drove back some of the forces near Kunming.
He has a last line of defense along the river between Chungking and Kienko. Rather than forcing the river line I will use the opportunity of his forces being hit in the open to weaken his troops while gathering my divisions together for a push.
Engineering
Kweiyang to 6, needed the extra basing given the number of 2E planes in use.
R&D
Mitsubishi Ha-43 now 11/44
Ki-44-IIc now 2/43

RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 4:32 am
by Spidery
September 20th 1942
Air Losses: 6 Japanese, 4 Allied, 1 Pilots
Japanese occupy:
Allies occupy:
Japanese land at:
Allies land at:
Pacific
When I saw the Allied CV in the Solomons I sent raider forces into the Southern Indian Ocean and East Pacific.
These were withdrawing as the Allied CVs could be moving anywhere. In the East Pacific I find a convoy of xAK carrying fuel to Pearl Harbour[:)]. Unfortunately, they escape[:(] after I get a few licks in.
Japanese Ships
CA Chikuma
CA Myoko
CA Haguro
CA Ashigara
CA Furutaka, Shell hits 1
CA Kako, Shell hits 2
DD Akigumo
DD Isokaze
DD Usugumo
DD Uranami
DD Yayoi
Allied Ships
AM Bobolink, Shell hits 1
AM Penguin, Shell hits 2, and is sunk
AM Turkey, Shell hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
AM Rail, Shell hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AM Tern
AM Grebe, Shell hits 3
AM Vireo, Shell hits 3, on fire
AK Alchiba, Shell hits 6, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AK Procyon, Shell hits 12, and is sunk
AK Castor, Shell hits 10, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
xAK British Columbia, Shell hits 4, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
xAK Montgomery City
xAK Ewa
xAK Mahimahi
xAK Makena
xAK Mana
xAK Manulani
xAK Admiral Halstead
xAK Crown City, Shell hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
xAK Unicoi, Shell hits 3, heavy fires
xAK Capillo, Shell hits 1, heavy fires
xAK Coast Trader
xAK Idaho, Shell hits 3, heavy fires
xAK Meigs
xAK Starr King, Shell hits 6, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
All the damaged freighters will probably sink since they had fuel cargo that ignited. Fuel status for the task force is critical so no chance to stay around for another day. However, there are half-a-dozen subs heading in.
Otherwise quiet, not very many Allied subs spotted now.
Burma
Quiet
China
I forgot to cancel orders to cross the river South of Kienko. However, it worked out fine as the enemy turned out to be phantom troops[;)]:
Ground combat at 78,42 (near Kienko)
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 28562 troops, 246 guns, 177 vehicles, Assault Value = 905
Defending force 46163 troops, 95 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 563
Japanese adjusted assault: 545
Allied adjusted defense: 100
Japanese assault odds: 5 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: op mode(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)
Japanese ground losses:
615 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 73 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 14 disabled
Vehicles lost 14 (1 destroyed, 13 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
19341 casualties reported
Squads: 324 destroyed, 293 disabled
Non Combat: 327 destroyed, 218 disabled
Engineers: 20 destroyed, 17 disabled
Guns lost 19 (12 destroyed, 7 disabled)
Units retreated 15
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!
Assaulting units:
32nd Division
8th Tank Regiment
1st Division
26th Fld AA Machinecannon Company
4th Army
55th Field AA Battalion
11th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
Defending units:
19th Chinese Corps
2nd Chinese Corps
34th Separate Brigade
67th Chinese Corps
48th Chinese Corps
4th Construction Regiment
22nd Group Army
15th Chinese Corps
31st Group Army
Red Chinese Army
39th Group Army
1st Artillery Regiment
8th Chinese Base Force
36th Group Army
6th Chinese Base Force
15th Chinese Base Force
Annoyingly, one Chinese unit failed to retreat so I don't control the hex[:(]. Chinese retreated North to Kienko where they can starve[:)]. My troops will need a few days to recover from disruption and he could reinforce with good troops in that time. Nice to see an artillery regiment that has not made it to Chungking.
Engineering
Allies expand Katherine to level 7. Ndeni port to 2.
Reinforcements
An 8150 capacity tanker arrives.
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:08 am
by Spidery
September 21st 1942
Air Losses: 3 Japanese, 4 Allied, 1 Pilots
Japanese occupy:
Allies occupy:
Japanese land at:
Allies land at:
Pacific
Just inconclusive sub action.
Burma
Quiet
China
He pulled out from the bridgehead hex so I now have a bridgehead across the river and have opened a long supply route to send fuel and supplies to Chengtu.
Attack at Neikiang goes well and drives the Chinese out.
Attacking force 31007 troops, 398 guns, 402 vehicles, Assault Value = 977
Defending force 41257 troops, 156 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 915
Japanese adjusted assault: 653
Allied adjusted defense: 316
Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: preparation(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
544 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 66 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Allied ground losses:
13590 casualties reported
Squads: 380 destroyed, 120 disabled
Non Combat: 574 destroyed, 34 disabled
Engineers: 22 destroyed, 23 disabled
Guns lost 25 (8 destroyed, 17 disabled)
Units retreated 8
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!
Assaulting units:
36th Division
20th Recon Regiment
5th Armored Car Co
15th Tank Regiment
8th Armored Car Co
40th Division
26th Recon Regiment
4th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
13th Mortar Battalion
11th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
12th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
5th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
6th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
13th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
3rd Army
24th Fld AA Machinecannon Company
10th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
Botanko Hvy Gun Regiment
14th JNAF AF Unit /1
Defending units:
44th Chinese Corps
51st Chinese Corps
28th Chinese Corps
52nd Chinese Corps
21st Chinese Corps
62nd Chinese Corps
43rd Chinese Corps
9th Group Army
Australia
Subs attack a CA task force heading into Perth.
Engineering
Allies expand Lunga airfield to 2.
R&D
Quiet
Reinforcements
An SC arrives.
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:07 am
by Spidery
Game was delayed a bit as MrKane demonstrated coffee and computers do not mix.
September 22nd 1942
Air Losses: 0 Japanese, 3 Allied, 0 Pilots
Japanese occupy:
Allies occupy: Tassafaronga(auto)
Japanese land at:
Allies land at:
Pacific
Inconclusive action.
Tried moving the Zuiho but was a bad move as pumps immediately failed and she sank[:(]. Not unexpected, maybe I should have left her at Rabaul and at least forced him to send bombers.
Burma
Quiet
China
Just bombing
Australia
Quiet
Engineering
Allies expand Chittagong port to level 5.
R&D
A6M5b to 12/43.
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:23 am
by mind_messing
Tried moving the Zuiho but was a bad move as pumps immediately failed and she sank. Not unexpected, maybe I should have left her at Rabaul and at least forced him to send bombers.
Yeah, Japanese ships are fragile, fragile things. I've made a point of never moving anything until the system damage is completely gone. It's led to some ships sitting in port with battles ranging in nearby hexes.
When you've got a ship as badly damaged as the Zuiho (or anything with 50+ flt damage) try to pair it up with an AR for the trip home. Try to do the trip in as many short hops as possible. That way, if the Japanese damage control team tries to drain the water by opening a hole below the waterline, the damaged ship can disband into a base or dot hex, and the repair ship can help patch up the damage and carry on their way.
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:00 pm
by Spidery
September 23rd 1942
Air Losses: 23 Japanese, 11 Allied, 7 Pilots
Japanese occupy:
Allies occupy: Auki(auto)
Japanese land at:
Allies land at:
Pacific
I-168 sinks the damaged CL De Ruyter South of Tulagi.
Burma
Lightnings sweep Magwe. For various reasons the only defense was A6M2 and Ki-43-Ic. However, they do okay, losing 11 Zeroes and 10 Oscars but downing 8 P-38F.
China
Bombing and some minor attacks. More move arrows suggest an Allied evacuation towards India of many units (probably the most damaged ones).
On the road to Tsuyung, attack with tank regiments and get a good result. Will be able to attack again in 2 days.
Ground combat at 68,47 (near Kunming)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 18116 troops, 299 guns, 497 vehicles, Assault Value = 614
Defending force 16448 troops, 126 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 339
Japanese adjusted assault: 324
Allied adjusted defense: 607
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
163 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Vehicles lost 13 (1 destroyed, 12 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
461 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 70 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Assaulting units:
17th Tank Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
24th Division
9th Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
11th Tank Regiment
20th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
5th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
12th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
12th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
3rd Mortar Battalion
Defending units:
1st Chinese Corps
66th Chinese Corps
At Urumchi, enough supply arrives to fix 1 oil well. However, it will be another 10 days before another 1000 supply arrives and can fix the next point so it will be 6 months to fix all the damaged wells.
Australia
Quiet
Engineering
Allies expand Lunga airfield to 3 and Ndeni airfield to 3.
R&D
The first N1K1-J factory has been fully repaired; in advance of the engine even being ready, let alone at 500 stockpiled. Will research this: it will give an aircraft that can get above the P-38 (until the P-38J).
Ki-43-IV to 9/44.
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:39 pm
by Lowpe
ORIGINAL: mind_messing
Yeah, Japanese ships are fragile, fragile things. I've made a point of never moving anything until the system damage is completely gone. It's led to some ships sitting in port with battles ranging in nearby hexes.
Do you mean minor flood damage possibly from counter flooding?
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:17 pm
by mind_messing
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
ORIGINAL: mind_messing
Yeah, Japanese ships are fragile, fragile things. I've made a point of never moving anything until the system damage is completely gone. It's led to some ships sitting in port with battles ranging in nearby hexes.
Do you mean minor flood damage possibly from counter flooding?
Minor flooding and accumulated system damage, yes. The dice gods area already stacked against Japanese damage control, so getting rid of those five or six points of system damage help.
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:22 pm
by Lowpe
ORIGINAL: mind_messing
Minor flooding and accumulated system damage, yes. The dice gods area already stacked against Japanese damage control, so getting rid of those five or six points of system damage help.
+1.
I encouraged Spidery to stay in port until the minor flooding was pumped out in a pm, but he felt the risk from a port strike was too great.
It is a shame when you can both be right and lose the ship no matter what you do.[:(]
I have seen over 20 points of counter flooding from torpedo hits...multiple torpedo hits.
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 4:09 pm
by Spidery
Aircraft Losses to date

RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:07 pm
by Lowpe
I would call those losses very light.[:)]
How many total planes do you have in service?
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 4:20 am
by Spidery
September 24th 1942
Air Losses: 1 Japanese, 3 Allied, 0 Pilots
Japanese occupy:
Allies occupy: Thousand Ships Bay(auto)
Japanese land at:
Allies land at:
Pacific
Near Palmyra, I-156 fires 6 torpedoes at BB California: all miss[:@].
BB California and Maryland are spotted. No idea if they are heading to or from Pearl Harbour.
Burma
Quiet
China
Just pushing against an open door. Air strikes at Chungking airfields see no flak[;)].
If he is evacuating out of supply Chinese to India they have some 4 to 8 months of walking across mountains without supply, just how much attrition will they take?
Australia
Quiet
Engineering
Allies expand Lunga airfield to 4 (Oh to have all those engineers[:D], size 2 on the 21st, size 3 on the 23rd, size 4 on the 24th).
R&D
Quiet
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 4:21 am
by Spidery
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I would call those losses very light.[:)]
How many total planes do you have in service?
I don't know. How can I find out?
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 4:28 am
by Spidery
[/quote]
I would call those losses very light.
In comparison to what you took over they certainly are.
It is a worry that they are so light but MrKane doesn't give me many opportunities. Since the Japanese can expect to lose all ships and most territory and take a fairly fixed strategic loss the best way to fend off Allied victory is to inflict heavy aircraft losses, as long as they are at less than 2:1. This is best done early.
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 5:18 am
by Spidery
How strong a defense is needed at a base to:
a) protect against a surprise Allied parachute attack.
b) protect against a surprise Allied sub-transport assault.
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:41 am
by GreyJoy
ORIGINAL: Spidery
How strong a defense is needed at a base to:
a) protect against a surprise Allied parachute attack.
b) protect against a surprise Allied sub-transport assault.
If it's in a clear terrain, i'd say at least 50 AVs with some forts (3 minimum). If it's +2 or +3 terrain even less probably, but 50 AVs is a good rule of thumb imh0
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:58 am
by Spidery
ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
ORIGINAL: Spidery
How strong a defense is needed at a base to:
a) protect against a surprise Allied parachute attack.
b) protect against a surprise Allied sub-transport assault.
If it's in a clear terrain, i'd say at least 50 AVs with some forts (3 minimum). If it's +2 or +3 terrain even less probably, but 50 AVs is a good rule of thumb imh0
Thank-you, so that is about the size of a Naval Guard Unit plus a small engineering unit to get the forts built.
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:59 am
by GreyJoy
Yes. What base do you have in mind?
RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:00 am
by Spidery
September 25th 1942
Air Losses: 3 Japanese, 3 Allied, 2 Pilots
Japanese occupy:
Allies occupy:
Japanese land at:
Allies land at:
Pacific
I-156 fires puts two torpedoes into the side of CL Nashville[8D]. With MASSIVE EXPLOSIVE DAMAGE and severe damage messages it looks promising but no sinking sounds and no aircraft losses.
I-31 sinks a small xAK near Suva[:)].
Allied subs seem active around Rabaul again and MrKane has stepped up night search there. He may be planning another move.[:-]
Burma
A small Allied CL force bombards Akyab relatively ineffectively.
China
Kienko appears to have been abandoned[:)]. This will be a big help in letting me get a couple of divisions and an artillery train into action.
Another good attack on the road to Burma.
Australia
SigInt has detected troops moving on Wyndham and on Derby[:(].
Engineering
Quiet
R&D
Quiet