Page 30 of 30
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:14 pm
by jesperpehrson
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Edit: If you didn't reinforce the BoB then the German will attempt to initiate please.
That is actually impossible, as I did not reinforce in the BoB you will not be able to initiate there.
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:24 pm
by jesperpehrson
Naval combat continued:
CW initiates in the Italian Coast, flipping CA Manchester.
Italy does not commit subs.
Allies rolls 3
Axis rolls 8
CW choses to fight only the 1-box.
CW has 8 surprisepoints.
CW choses to not make it a Naval Air combat.
Initial Italian risk is X D A
Initial CW risk D
CW uses the 8 points to raise Italian risk to 2X D 2A
How does Italy wish to distribute the risk?
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:25 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: jesperpehrson
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Edit: If you didn't reinforce the BoB then the German will attempt to initiate please.
That is actually impossible, as I did not reinforce in the BoB you will not be able to initiate there.
warspite1
Yeah I knew that..... I didn't want to initiate anyway.....
[:D][:)][8|][&:]
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:26 pm
by warspite1
TRS first and then the cruisers - trying to spread the risk as much as possible please.
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:37 pm
by jesperpehrson
Naval combat continued:
CW stays. Does Italy stay?
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:53 pm
by warspite1
No thank-you
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 2:04 pm
by jesperpehrson
Naval combat continued:
The Italian fleet in the Italian Coast aborts to La Spezia.
CW initiates in the Eastern Med. CA Australia is flipped.
Italy commits their SUBs as there are CPs to be destroyed.
Allies rolls a 7.
Axis rolls a 1.

0-box - 2 CP + TRS
3-box - a lot of ships including CVs
4-box - a french CA and a CW BB
Which boxes does Italy want to include? Do they want a SUB-combat or surfacecombat? Do they want to stick around for another round or do they want to abort? Where to?
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 2:13 pm
by warspite1
Surface combat please - 0-box only. Max damage for no loss and the fleet stick around please
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 2:15 pm
by jesperpehrson
hmm?
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 2:17 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: jesperpehrson
hmm?
warspite1
It was code [:D] I've now de-coded [:)]
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 2:26 pm
by jesperpehrson
Naval combat continued:
Italy fights only against the 0-box.
Italy has 9 surprisepoints.
It will be a surfacecombat.
Italy uses their surprise to raise the CW risk to 2X.
Both Italy and CW stays.
Italy does not commit subs as convoys are gone.
Allies rolls 5
Axis rolls 2
Italy has to chose to fight the 3 or 4-box. Only the 3-box has a CV with CVP.
Does Italy stick around after this round?
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 2:43 pm
by warspite1
Italy chooses the box without air, it maximises enemy damage and then gets the hell out of there please
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 2:46 pm
by jesperpehrson
Naval combat continued:
Italy elects to fight the 4-box.
As there are no bombers there is no risk for either side.
CW stays.
Italy aborts. Where?
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 2:53 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: jesperpehrson
Naval combat continued:
Italy elects to fight the 4-box.
As there are no bombers there is no risk for either side.
CW stays.
Italy aborts. Where?
warspite1
The Italians will put into La Spezia if poss please
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 3:05 pm
by jesperpehrson
Naval combat continued:
Italy abort to La Spezia if possible.
FTR is aborted to Sicily as it cannot reach the mainland.
2 CA and a BB tries to run the gauntlet to reach La Spezia. CW tries to intercept in the Italian Coast.
A 10 is rolled and they safely reach harbour.
The germans does not initiate in the North Atlantic.
Groundstrikes:
None
Rail movement:
A russian AT-gun is railed to Minsk.
Landmovement:
Some minor adjustments in northern China
Air rebase:
CW rebases a Spitfire and a Hurricane to Plymouth.
End of turn. A 8 is rolled and the turn continues.
New weather:
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 6:48 pm
by WILHELM_slith
Sep/Okt 1940 Axis#9
Land move for Japan.
Ground strike. Bomber from Canton misses next door Canton militia with a roll of 9.
Bomber whence
Rail move ATdiv frong Changsha to Sian. HQ Yamamoto to [76,135] Stack with Ki-30 bomber.
Await the Movement phase.
RE: GLOBAL WAR COUNTER-FACTUAL (W1/Wilhelm vs rkr1958/jp)
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 12:26 pm
by warspite1
Sep/Oct 1940
Impulse: 9 (Axis)
Declarations of War and Alignments: None
Japan: Land
Germany: Land
Italy: Land
Naval Air: None
Strategic Bombardment: None
Ground Strike:
Japan
See Above
Rail Movement:
Japan
See Above
Germany
Two INF Corps and an INF DIV head for Lodz
Land Movement:
Italy
The Italians continue the long trek home
Germany
The Germans continue the even longer trek east
Over to the Japanese
Air Rebase:
Italy
Ba.65 to east of Rome
Germany
None