Page 4 of 4
RE: Oh, Canada
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:25 am
by Froonp
Yes to what ?
ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
Yes
RE: Oh, Canada
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:34 am
by Jeff Gilbert
Quick question. I am interested in looking over the maps covering the USA (48 continental states).
And, well ... I could not find the posts. [:(]
Could someone point me to the right thread/post(s).
RE: Oh, Canada
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:03 am
by Shannon V. OKeets
ORIGINAL: Froonp
Yes to what ?
ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
Yes
I meant that adding Labrador as a separately governed area would be a good thing.
RE: Oh, Canada
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:10 am
by Shannon V. OKeets
ORIGINAL: Jeff Gilbert
Quick question. I am interested in looking over the maps covering the USA (48 continental states).
And, well ... I could not find the posts. [:(]
Could someone point me to the right thread/post(s).
On the third page of the listings of MWIF forum threads, you'll find the thread: MWIF Map Review - America. It has a lot of posts, so you get to choose whether to: (1) start at the beginning and not miss anything, but have to read through a lot of the earlier map versions, or (2) start towards the end, but maybe miss som of the areas that were presented and accepted by the forum members with very few changes.
If you want to change the coastlines, you better be quick, because Rob is going to (already is?) work(ing) on the USA next.
If your comments are about items other than the coastlines, then we can make those changes pretty much anytime.
RE: Oh, Canada
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:22 pm
by Froonp
ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
I meant that adding Labrador as a separately governed area would be a good thing.
This is done.
Here is the northern part.
It is labelled "Labrador", but the Territory is named "Newfoundland and Labrador", and includes Newfoundland and Labrador. I left the separate names, because the whole name was long.
Also, I replaced Rigolet by Goose Bay.

RE: Oh, Canada
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:23 pm
by Froonp
And here is the southern part, showing Newfoundland, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.

RE: Oh, Canada
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:15 am
by JagdFlanker
did some looking up - south-eastern corner of labrador is a little off, blanc sablon was a couple hexes off, harrington should be harrington harbour, halifax was located on the wrong side of the inlet (the side it was on is called dartmouth), and finally very minor but it's just called cape breton, not cape breton island. i will call attention that the far south tip of newfoundland (/st pierre) should be about equal with the far north tip of cape breton, but no biggie since it looks pretty good anyhow.

RE: Oh, Canada
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:40 pm
by Incy
The seasone boundary near newfoundland strikes me as being placed oddly, wouldn't it be better placed at the narrows between newfoundland and the mainland ?
RE: Oh, Canada
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:23 pm
by Froonp
ORIGINAL: Flanker Leader
did some looking up - south-eastern corner of labrador is a little off, blanc sablon was a couple hexes off, harrington should be harrington harbour, halifax was located on the wrong side of the inlet (the side it was on is called dartmouth), and finally very minor but it's just called cape breton, not cape breton island. i will call attention that the far south tip of newfoundland (/st pierre) should be about equal with the far north tip of cape breton, but no biggie since it looks pretty good anyhow.
I checked what you said, and as you were right, I made the change.
For the position of the southern tip of Newfoundland, this is now too late to change it, but I think it is good anyhow as you said.
RE: Oh, Canada
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:26 pm
by Froonp
ORIGINAL: Incy
The seasone boundary near newfoundland strikes me as being placed oddly, wouldn't it be better placed at the narrows between newfoundland and the mainland ?
Well, its placed at the same place where it is in the WiF FE game.
