RE: Any future patches comming?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:50 am
Not really
What's your Strategy?
https://forums.matrixgames.com:443/
I think David's let us in on a big clue here...maybe instead of fixing the bugs they've invinted a program that eliminates the people that complain about theml.
Officially that comment was unofficial. Even though it was made by an official, any comments are quite unofficial. The official word is that no unofficial comments are allowed, unless they come from an official source and are made as an official comment. But that was an unofficial comment so officially there is no comment. However, unofficially there is no official comment, so unofficially there is no comment either, but then I am an unofficial source not an official source. Therefore any comments I make are unofficial and that is official.
ORIGINAL: Charles_22
Any idea how far away this patch is? 3 months? 6 months?
ORIGINAL: ChezDaJez
I think David's let us in on a big clue here...maybe instead of fixing the bugs they've invinted a program that eliminates the people that complain about theml.
that would be too much to hope for...[:D]
Chez
And before 15 yearsORIGINAL: ChezDaJez
ORIGINAL: Charles_22
Any idea how far away this patch is? 3 months? 6 months?
Probably sometime after today...
Chez
ORIGINAL: Charles_22
And before 15 years
ORIGINAL: flipperwasirish
Will the new routines include Klingon disrupters AND after Jan, 1, 1942, Cloaking Devices for land units prepped for a taregt above 38%?
Just random thoughts...
ORIGINAL: RevRick
WHAT!!! How about an accurate torpedo, say with 2-3 grams of anti-matter in the explosive????
Officially that comment was unofficial. Even though it was made by an official, any comments are quite unofficial. The official word is that no unofficial comments are allowed, unless they come from an official source and are made as an official comment. But that was an unofficial comment so officially there is no comment. However, unofficially there is no official comment, so unofficially there is no comment either, but then I am an unofficial source not an official source. Therefore any comments I make are unofficial and that is official.
[:D]Actually a nuke would never believe a rumor. He'd need to see it in the maunual, backed up by at least two other references , ( which one of which really should be his COB/SEA).[:D] Just kidding! I thought he sounded more like disbursing clerk. [;)]ORIGINAL: joey
You sound more like a navy nuke eveyday!
I figured out your position. You are the distributor of useless or confusing information. [:'(]ORIGINAL: Terminus
Yes.
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
[:D]Actually a nuke would never believe a rumor. He'd need to see it in the maunual, backed up by at least two other references , ( which one of which really should be his COB/SEA).[:D] Just kidding! I thought he sounded more like disbursing clerk. [;)]ORIGINAL: joey
You sound more like a navy nuke eveyday!
[:D]Then I take it you never heard the defination of the big three Navy communities and their respective relationships with "The Book"?[:D] I did a LMET course (that should date me) back in the eighties at New London at the sub school.....I'm not sure that's quite all smoke and mirrors. That course (consisting of 25 "bubbleheads", 16 of whom were "nukes"and 1 token "Airdale"-me) )was the longest two weeks of my life.[8|]ORIGINAL: joey
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
[:D]Actually a nuke would never believe a rumor. He'd need to see it in the maunual, backed up by at least two other references , ( which one of which really should be his COB/SEA).[:D] Just kidding! I thought he sounded more like disbursing clerk. [;)]ORIGINAL: joey
You sound more like a navy nuke eveyday!
I was a nuke for 25 years. All that manual and backing up stuff were all just smoke and mirrors. Remember all reactors are just large Bic lighters. All you do is move the -/+ on the lighter in the direction you like. We use all the other confusing stuff to make us look important. Somewhat like most of the above comments and circular arguments about patches. The confusion adds to the mystery! Or is it the other way around?
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
[:D]Then I take it you never heard the defination of the big three Navy communities and their respective relationships with "The Book"?[:D] I did a LMET course (that should date me) back in the eighties at New London at the sub school.....I'm not sure that's quite all smoke and mirrors. That course (consisting of 25 "bubbleheads", 16 of whom were "nukes"and 1 token "Airdale"-me) )was the longest two weeks of my life.[8|]ORIGINAL: joey
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
[:D]Actually a nuke would never believe a rumor. He'd need to see it in the maunual, backed up by at least two other references , ( which one of which really should be his COB/SEA).[:D] Just kidding! I thought he sounded more like disbursing clerk. [;)]
I was a nuke for 25 years. All that manual and backing up stuff were all just smoke and mirrors. Remember all reactors are just large Bic lighters. All you do is move the -/+ on the lighter in the direction you like. We use all the other confusing stuff to make us look important. Somewhat like most of the above comments and circular arguments about patches. The confusion adds to the mystery! Or is it the other way around?