Page 4 of 7

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 9:45 am
by LazyBoy
Turn to Kom, good luck everyone

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:49 am
by kombrig
I don't have the possibility to load the turn until this evening. But I can see the map in the dropbox and I would be able to make some plans already if I knew who controlls which regime. Am I right that: Mean - Russian town names; Lazy - French town names ? Who moves after Lazy? Regime with Arabic or English town names?

Edit: Ok, loaded turn and got the answer already.

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:49 pm
by kombrig
Turn to Iron.

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:37 pm
by ironduke1955
Did I get a invite to the Drop Box the game is not on my list of games ?

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:29 pm
by Meanfcker
You are invited.

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:07 pm
by LazyBoy
Ya we are under way[:D]

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:03 am
by ironduke1955
Kom states turn to iron there are two turns in the file 1b Lazy that I am sure is not mine 1d Kom I took to be mine because of the designation (d) I am the fourth player tho the Kom I took to be a mistake. My capital turns out to be Philadelphia ? is this correct since my CC tells me his Capital is Philadelphia.

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:55 am
by kombrig
Your turn should be 1d Iron (1d Kom is probably a mistake, it should be 1c Kom). I don't know what went wrong, since I'm sure that I put your turn into dropbox. I can check it soon and just in case I'll also e-mail your turn to you.

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:39 am
by LazyBoy
My mistake, Kom should be c not d, sorry.
The turn dated 31/10/2012 should be your's

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:51 am
by LazyBoy
Turn to Kom

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:22 am
by kombrig
We decided to surrender. Excellent play from your side, Mean and Lazy, plus a few severe mistakes by me resulted that our (especially mine) situation is bad. I don't believe that I'm able to come out of this. My only excuse is that this was my first PBEM game [:)]

If it's OK to you, Iron and I are ready for another game. Only this time we would like to create the map.

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:13 pm
by ironduke1955
Like to mirror Kombrig's sentiment thanks for game I am up for a rematch

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:23 pm
by Meanfcker
Thanks for a good game guys.
Ironduke, I must commend you on your effort to cut supplies to my invasion force at Philadelphia. Although it failed, that attempt was bold and well executed, one of the best that anyone has ever tried on me. Of coarse I am up for a rematch, and of coarse you may generate the map and go first, contingent upon Lazyboy's approbation.
The main thing I look for in a map is that no one has any major isolated areas. We wish for the game to be decided by skilled gameplay and not by map placement.
Again, good game.
Meanfcker.

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:47 pm
by kombrig
ORIGINAL: Meanfcker
Ironduke, I must commend you on your effort to cut supplies to my invasion force at Philadelphia. Although it failed, that attempt was bold and well executed, one of the best that anyone has ever tried on me.

That was me. [:)] I should have done it one turn earlier and I should have used more medium tanks instead light ones. Maybe then the result wouldn't have been a complete failure.

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 8:11 pm
by LazyBoy
Good game, thanks.

I am happy for a rematch.
I am not sure who was the Holly empire,but the only mistake I could see was your invasion was on too narrow a front, making it vulnerable to being cut off, mind you I do this as well.

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 8:25 pm
by Meanfcker
Hey guys, if I may recommend something learned from hard experience, your Supreme Commander should always go first. This way, if the situation changes, he can call a halt to any impending offensives, or change plans due to enemy action.
Meanfcker.

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 9:30 pm
by ironduke1955
Lazy I was the Holy Empire and yes I left the flank a exposed. A lesson learned I should have listened to my CC. A broadfront outlook especially on a map that large is the best option. In answer to Mean Kombrig was CC

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:53 pm
by kombrig
Ok, I sent all of you invitation.

Turn order:
1) Sultinate (Kom)
2) Paris (Iron)
3) Nippon
4) Peoples Republic

Good luck!

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 11:27 am
by kombrig
Mean, Lazy, how is it going? Who's your CC this time?

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:20 pm
by Meanfcker
I am Supremo.
I have sent the game to Lazy.
Good luck and have fun.
Meanie.