Page 4 of 4
RE: Apologies
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:10 pm
by Jimm
ORIGINAL: capitan
ORIGINAL: paulderynck
ORIGINAL: Omnius
michaelbaldur,
Sorry I got a bit annoyed with you, but your suggestion was an insult even though I know you intended to be helpful. So I hope you'll apologize for not thinking I had a clue about what I was talking about.
If you look at Shannon's answer a few messages down you'll find out I was correct about there being a problem with Japan sending a Build Point to the USA, it has to be a saved BP - not one in current production. This really should have been made more clear in the documentation and I hope that at least the PDF file manuals get updated to give us the exact method of how to send Japanese build points to the USA.
Looks like I did some good beta testing after purchasing the program, my beta testing skills have not diminished from being able to spot problems with game programs.
Omnius
Your rudeness is incredible. It's surprising anyone here is bothering to try and assist you.
You think he should apologize? Did you re-read what you wrote to him? Not to mention how many others that offered suggestions. They don't know if you are a Noob or not.
Yeah the production and convoy routing and supply has some problems. We get that.
It's a game. Stop behaving like a spoiled child.
+1
+2
Omnius
A rule check is a reasonable response to any bug query and implied nothing about your level of idiocy. Your overreaction to it implies a heck of a lot more. Get a grip and apologise.
RE: Apologies
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 2:32 am
by bo
ORIGINAL: Jimm
ORIGINAL: capitan
ORIGINAL: paulderynck
Your rudeness is incredible. It's surprising anyone here is bothering to try and assist you.
You think he should apologize? Did you re-read what you wrote to him? Not to mention how many others that offered suggestions. They don't know if you are a Noob or not.
Yeah the production and convoy routing and supply has some problems. We get that.
It's a game. Stop behaving like a spoiled child.
+1
+2
Omnius
A rule check is a reasonable response to any bug query and implied nothing about your level of idiocy. Your overreaction to it implies a heck of a lot more. Get a grip and apologise.
+ 3
Very surprised by you reactions omnius to people trying to answer your question, I did not expect this kind of behavior from you, but then again I have been called very naive.
Bo
RE: Apologies
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:44 am
by Centuur
ORIGINAL: bo
ORIGINAL: Jimm
ORIGINAL: capitan
+1
+2
Omnius
A rule check is a reasonable response to any bug query and implied nothing about your level of idiocy. Your overreaction to it implies a heck of a lot more. Get a grip and apologise.
+ 3
Very surprised by you reactions omnius to people trying to answer your question, I did not expect this kind of behavior from you, but then again I have been called very naive.
Bo
+ 4
RE: Apologies
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:50 am
by AxelNL
ORIGINAL: Centuur
ORIGINAL: bo
ORIGINAL: Jimm
+2
Omnius
A rule check is a reasonable response to any bug query and implied nothing about your level of idiocy. Your overreaction to it implies a heck of a lot more. Get a grip and apologise.
+ 3
Very surprised by you reactions omnius to people trying to answer your question, I did not expect this kind of behavior from you, but then again I have been called very naive.
Bo
+ 4
+5
RE: Apologies
Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 10:59 am
by Neilster
Yeah Ominus. You are being extremely rude.
Neilster