Page 4 of 155
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 12:22 pm
by cfinch
fwiw - i thought only bad roll was DX (or AX) in which case you just let other player choose effectively 'fixing' the roll.
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 1:16 pm
by ashkpa
Japanese are doing several ground strikes. The Chinese fighter can fly over it's own hex, assuming it did not fly CAP (email question - assumption being no, if it did, then myhttp://
www.matrixgames.com/forums/post.asp?do= ... toStyle=tm# ground strike flights may change). Do you want it to fly defending Chiang?

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 2:46 pm
by rkr1958
Yes to Chinese fighter flying to defend Chaing against Ground Strikes. Rebase Chinese fighter in hex, China[87, 136].
Also, the Poles choose assault on all land combats this impulse. Any results calling for less losses than units attacked chose the least important ones first to destroy.
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 11:25 am
by ashkpa
Getting a bit done before my guest awake this morning.
Chinese AA combat.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 11:30 am
by ashkpa
Lodz Ground Strike

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 11:30 am
by ashkpa
Warsaw Ground Strike

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 11:31 am
by rkr1958
ORIGINAL: ashkpa
Getting a bit done before my guest awake this morning.
Looks like no rebasing necessary for the Chinese fighter. [:(]
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 11:49 am
by ashkpa
Where would you like surviving Polish naval units to flee?
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 11:57 am
by rkr1958
ORIGINAL: ashkpa
Where would you like surviving Polish naval units to flee?
Scapa flow.
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:31 pm
by ashkpa
Polish CA escapes to Scapa Flow, however the convoy was sunk on way out of port.
German Attack on Krakow was a full success. And is to be followed up by two other attacks.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:34 pm
by ashkpa
Poznan is another success.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:37 pm
by ashkpa
And the hat trick was completed north of Warsaw.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:46 pm
by ashkpa
Below is not an issue at the moment. Is their an explanation on why the reorg cost for the Harbin Terr is 4? Japanese took a combined, so I was expecting to see it cost 2.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:12 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Did you choose land action, combined or naval?
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:51 pm
by Courtenay
ORIGINAL: ashkpa
Below is not an issue at the moment. Is their an explanation on why the reorg cost for the Harbin Terr is 4? Japanese took a combined, so I was expecting to see it cost 2.
The Harbin TERR is not a Japanese unit, it is a Manchurian unit. For a Japanese HQ to reorganize it costs double. As the Japanese took a combined, this is doubled a second time to four.
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:28 pm
by rkr1958
Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2.
France & CW take navals. China takes a land. USSR & USA take combines.
The CW decides to use 2 of their 3 air missions for (surprise) port strikes. The first one is against Keil.
Keil (surprise) Port Strike.
I made the "minor" decision for you NOT to commit your subs at Keil. I hope this is ok and I hope we can make minor decisions such as these for the non-phasing player in order to speed up play.
Back to the Kiel port strike. The RAF bombers got through and did surprise the KM. However, their bombs were much less effective than I had hoped.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:30 pm
by rkr1958
Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. Rostock (surprise) Port Strike.
Again, RAF bombers get through and surprise the KM at Rostock. And again, the bombers are less effective than hoped.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 7:53 pm
by rkr1958
QUESTION: Does the Luftwaffe wish to intercept the Polish bomber flying a ground strike mission on the units in Krawkow, Poland? The Polish fighter is flying escort.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:17 pm
by ashkpa
Fine with the minor decisions (or really obvious). Yes intercept the Polish bomber.
I'm ok with 2.2.5 I really don't expect the loss issues with invasions or paradrops to raise it's head early in this game.
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:32 pm
by rkr1958
Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. Polish Ground Strike.
I'm sorry, but a great result for the Poles.
