Matrix Games Forums

Posted: **Sat May 04, 2024 8:44 pm**

larryfulkerson wrote: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:41 am
ORIGINAL: John B.
Oh I meant no disrespect to Andrey I was simply commenting that there is more fun to come for the North Koreans if they want to hang in there.
No disrespect was inferred my friend. It's all cool. I hope he's not got hurt feelings about how
the game turned out. It's not a fair scenario in that the UN troops have all kind of air power
and the NK dudes don't have B-29's and so it "feels" unbalanced when you try to play the NK side.
It takes more patience than I have to have fun after your supply situation collapses. Breaking
all those bridges devestated his supply I'm thinking. I would be tempted to leave South Korea
entirely. pull back to the north and better supply.

I really enjoyed this aar, and it's too bad that your opponent gave up just before the fun starts. I recently played this scenario as the communist against the po UN forces and I managed an overwhelming victory and nearly overran the entire peninsula by the end of the scenario. I'm thinking that an alternate, a-historical strategy would be beneficial for a player controlling the communist forces.

Posted: **Thu Mar 13, 2025 11:26 am**

larryfulkerson wrote: Sat Mar 03, 2018 6:51 pm Andy continues to move his troops south and he's pushing my units out of his way and
he's getting closer and closer to Pusan. That's my alamo spot and I need to protect
that port if I can.

Very interesting AAR ! I followed it eagerly

But I have a question. How was Andy capable of a sea landing on those ports in the west if the North Korean player has no maritime transport points at all??
North Korean player only has rail transport points

Matrix Games Forums

Korea 50-53 Andy77 ( NKPA ) and larry ( UN )

Re: RE: Korea 50-53

Re: RE: Korea 50-53