What's your Strategy?
https://forums.matrixgames.com:443/
ORIGINAL: cathar1244
https://www.general-staff.com/about/
This looked promising, but no updates since 2017, it seems. It was a project by the guy who programmed Universal Military Simulator I and II way back when.
Cheers
ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
ORIGINAL: golden delicious
ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
What difference does it make when they are fixed so long as they are fixed before the release?
The release has bugs in it.
I'm not a developer- but I'm nevertheless aware that developers are supposed to regularly regression test the software they're working on to iron out bugs as and when they arise- not later when you've finished doing the fun stuff.
Sure. You fix the bugs that crop up in the thing you are working on as they come up. But legacy bugs that are in other parts of the code have to be fixed without that benefit (especially if they were made by Ralph!). There is no benefit to prioritizing them.
ORIGINAL: jmlima
I know the net is full of experts, take this as free unwanted advice, that's not how you develop software.
It's actually slightly mind-boggling that someone is willingly sinking a lot of personal time and effort into an admitedly flawed product without sorting out the flaws first.
Oh no! Apparently I have to agree with every baseless claim anyone makes and any lie they fabricate about me. How dare I not serve as your floormat!ORIGINAL: Lobster
TOAW Forum Rules:
Rule #1 Bob is always right.
Rule #2 If you think he is wrong refer to Rule #1.
[:D][:D][:D][:D]
Note that they solicited donations to kickstart it. Got over $16K. Wonder how those folks feel now?ORIGINAL: cathar1244
https://www.general-staff.com/about/
This looked promising, but no updates since 2017, it seems. It was a project by the guy who programmed Universal Military Simulator I and II way back when.
Cheers
Dunno, they probably feel glad to have spent a few bucks on a game that looked like something other than the same old crap. I'd happily contribute to a kickstarter for a WWII operational level game.ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
Note that they solicited donations to kickstart it. Got over $16K. Wonder how those folks feel now?
ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
Note that they solicited donations to kickstart it. Got over $16K. Wonder how those folks feel now?ORIGINAL: cathar1244
https://www.general-staff.com/about/
This looked promising, but no updates since 2017, it seems. It was a project by the guy who programmed Universal Military Simulator I and II way back when.
Cheers
ORIGINAL: 76mm
Dunno, they probably feel glad to have spent a few bucks on a game that looked like something other than the same old crap. I'd happily contribute to a kickstarter for a WWII operational level game.ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
Note that they solicited donations to kickstart it. Got over $16K. Wonder how those folks feel now?
Meanwhile, I paid good money for this game and there's been, what, two patches in several years despite outstanding bugs. We already know how some players feel about that, as they've expressed themselves here on the forum.
Ooops, I keep forgetting...anything you don't agree with is "nonsense" or "lunacy". Given how Kickstarter works, the contributors knew the risks they were taking, and sometimes it doesn't work out. And yet they contributed anyway, because, well, they wanted to...OR
Acording to Lobster, I'm required to agree with this nonsense. Yes, I'm sure they're glad to have squandered $16K.
ORIGINAL: 76mm
Ooops, I keep forgetting...anything you don't agree with is "nonsense" or "lunacy". Given how Kickstarter works, the contributors knew the risks they were taking, and sometimes it doesn't work out. And yet they contributed anyway, because, well, they wanted to...OR
Acording to Lobster, I'm required to agree with this nonsense. Yes, I'm sure they're glad to have squandered $16K.
I doubt that I'm the only one that has spent plenty over the years--without any regrets--on games I've hardly played, or not played at all, to support promising developers. But I'm sure this is all nonsense to you, so hardly worth discussing..
As I said, anything you don't agree with is "nonsense," "lunacy," or now "loony-toon," or "crack-brained." It would be funny if it wasn't so consistent.ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
I'm required to agree with any loony-toon, crackbrained post you make.
I'm sure you contacted everyone in that kickstarter, or maybe you used clairvoyance. Regardless, no matter how utterly baseless some claim is, I have to agree with it.ORIGINAL: 76mm
As I said, anything you don't agree with is "nonsense," "lunacy," or now "loony-toon," or "crack-brained." It would be funny if it wasn't so consistent.ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
I'm required to agree with any loony-toon, crackbrained post you make.
Why yes, the same way that you apparently reached your conclusion...weird, huh?ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
I'm sure you contacted everyone in that kickstarter, or maybe you used clairvoyance.
ORIGINAL: 76mm
Why yes, the same way that you apparently reached your conclusion...weird, huh?ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
I'm sure you contacted everyone in that kickstarter, or maybe you used clairvoyance.
Wonder how those folks feel now?
ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
I didn't make any conclusion. Here's what I said:
You are clearly implying that they are "not glad" to have "squandered" $16k. Why are you so sure that they are "not glad" and consider their contribution "squandered"? What's your source for that conclusion?ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
Yes, I'm sure they're glad to have squandered $16K.
ORIGINAL: 76mm
LOL, as if I didn't see that deflection coming...and this comment isn't a conclusion?You are clearly implying that they are "not glad" to have "squandered" $16k. Why are you so sure that they are "not glad" and consider their contribution "squandered"? What's your source for that conclusion?ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
Yes, I'm sure they're glad to have squandered $16K.