RE: Why all this aversion when it comes to Hearts of Iron (HOI)?
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 7:45 am
Well Les, I'm sure after stealing the game to prove to people who called you out on criticising a game you'd never played, that you had a really open mind [8|]
There's probably a clinical description for those who hate something simply because it exists, which appears to be your position on Paradox. At least Ravinhood, who probably hates HOI more than you, contributed something and bought the game which prompted his dislike of it and of Paradox's release-whenever-it's-almost-finished policy, but for you, why do you bother?
Anyway, hopefully WiF and the A3R game will live up to the gaping vacuum in grand strategy WW2 games. At the moment there really aren't any which have managed to overcome design problems and terrible AI's, and I have little need for Risk++ branded World At War.
What would be great would be to see the makers or KP or HTTR branch out from the tactical as those two and Battlefront are really the only accomplished WW2 game developers who've accomplished anything beyond the mediocre these last few years
There's probably a clinical description for those who hate something simply because it exists, which appears to be your position on Paradox. At least Ravinhood, who probably hates HOI more than you, contributed something and bought the game which prompted his dislike of it and of Paradox's release-whenever-it's-almost-finished policy, but for you, why do you bother?
Anyway, hopefully WiF and the A3R game will live up to the gaping vacuum in grand strategy WW2 games. At the moment there really aren't any which have managed to overcome design problems and terrible AI's, and I have little need for Risk++ branded World At War.
What would be great would be to see the makers or KP or HTTR branch out from the tactical as those two and Battlefront are really the only accomplished WW2 game developers who've accomplished anything beyond the mediocre these last few years