Page 31 of 35
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T84
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:53 pm
by larryfulkerson
I took a look at all the units that had a 122mm Howitzer attached to it and it turns out there's some 5,000+ of them. And about 1/3 of
them are still on refit. 2/3 of them, in other words, have their full complement of arty tubes and 1/3 don't. That's where all the 122mm
arty tubes are going. And that's why there aren't many in the pool now.

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T84
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:59 pm
by larryfulkerson
I thought I'd go ahead and move the 20 points of vehicle factory still in Stalingrad. And next turn I'll get the heavy industroy out of there.

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T84
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:28 am
by Flapdrol
Why are you moving this industry?
It will take a while before they start producing vehicles again, and the worst thing KLilly can do is extend his front towards Stalingrad...
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T84
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:58 am
by randallw
You have a stray AT brigade ( Stavka command ) in the area of NW Front; those units aren't packed with equipment. You might want to disband it.
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T84
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:20 am
by larryfulkerson
ORIGINAL: randallw
You have a stray AT brigade ( Stavka command ) in the area of NW Front; those units aren't packed with equipment. You might want to disband it.
Actually that's a PVO AAA brigade that I thought might be moved around at the beginning of the turn to intice enemy air units to try to
interdict it thus suffering losses at the hand of an AAA unit. But it hasn't worked out that way. Moving the AAA unit has yet to cause it
to be interdicted. A lot of other stuff is interdicted but not this AAA unit so far. I know that because I want to keep track of the results of
the interdiction to see if it's profitable to do this. So far it's not been worth it. And yes, I do plan on disbanding that dude.
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T84
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:22 am
by larryfulkerson
ORIGINAL: Flapdrol
Why are you moving this industry?
It will take a while before they start producing vehicles again, and the worst thing KLilly can do is extend his front towards Stalingrad...
They suffered 50% damage during the move so I'm guessing they will be up and running again real soon now. I thought they didn't
produce unless they had less than 50% damage......I could be wrong about that. At any rate it's something else not to have to worry
about. And I had the unused rail cap left over enough to do it. I weighed the alternatives and decided to move it. I may not should have
but it's done now.
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T85
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:26 am
by larryfulkerson
T85: Here's what happened in the Crimea in the Axis turn:

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T85
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:31 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's the T85 front lines before any recon or movement:

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T85
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:35 am
by larryfulkerson
All the Axis attacks were in the deep south and there were three "retreated" results and three "held" results. That means I might be able
to hold my own in this area in the near future maybe.
EDIT: How wrong I was. In T88 all my troops were wiped out to a man.

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T85
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:08 am
by larryfulkerson
I moved my stuff to shuffle the good-supply guys to the front and low supply guys to the rear and did some attacks and not all that
much changed. Although I did create a much needed Rifle Corps for the lower right flank ( near one entrance to the Crimea ). And
maybe that will stop the pushing south. We'll see.

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T85
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:56 am
by larryfulkerson
I didn't know you could merge a rifle division but there's a MERGE tag on the unit description so evidently you can.

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T86
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:29 am
by larryfulkerson
T86: Disaster. I open the turn and found this in the south:

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T86
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:31 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's my moves with an overlay showing my attacks:

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T86
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:36 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's the OOB, losses, destroyed units, and production:

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T87
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:39 am
by larryfulkerson
T87: I opened the turn to find this in the south. I'm afraid all those guys are write-offs.

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T88
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:46 pm
by larryfulkerson
T88: I opened the turn to find this:

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T88
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:07 pm
by larryfulkerson
I feel so disrupted I don't feel much like attacking anywhere or anything. But the game must go on so I do some good ratio delib. attacks
and get some Axis units to back up one hex. But nothing much moves anywhere this turn. Here's the OOB, losses, destroyed units,
and production for the turn.

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T88
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:41 am
by randallw
You have that problem of mixed commands again, in the Crimea.
I'm guessing you are short on APs?
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T88
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 1:10 pm
by larryfulkerson
ORIGINAL: randallw
You have that problem of mixed commands again, in the Crimea.
I'm guessing you are short on APs?
Yes, I'm perpetually short of AP's. But then again I need to do something about the mixed commands. Thanks for noticing.
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T91
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:23 am
by larryfulkerson
T91: This is the front lines before any recon or movement:
