RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:25 pm
To the loyal readers...
I'm here to confess my sins, Tactics, Timing & Planning, have all been laid to waste by Larry. Furthermore I have put too many ships in for refit, clogging my shipyards and depleting my TF's of urgently needed escorts. Larry is running wild as expected, however my opponent has done better than any A.I opponent I've faced, he has taken over just about all of the important ports for Oil & Resource in the Pacific Rim by early January. Singapore and Palembang should last as least one more month, Rangoon doesn't seem high on his list to take right now.
Larry must keep alert for my Carrier TF's (Yorktown's going to be drydocked a while), The PH BB's are refitting (bad oversight/mistake there) and are still severely damaged, so I'm figuring they are out for most of the war. I'd scuttle them but don't want to give Larry all those VP's. What i'm getting from the East Coast is poor (little experience & equipment) right now but should improve in both quality and quantity over the next two years.
Larry and I were discussing IRL Allied tactics and the three main gambits North (Alaska) Central (Wake-Guam-Saipan) South (New Ginuea- Phillipines). I have a favorite against the A.I. - the Starvation Route! I make 2 bombardment TF's covered by CV TF, and go pound one of the Oil/Resource ports to rubble, but do not invade it. against the A.I. the A.I. would inevitably try to rebuild it. costing it twice as much and getting no production in the meantime. I found this cripples the Japanese economy and supply soon dries up to outer bases, making them easy pickings - it accelerates each time you do this and you dont lose nearly as many troops in fighting. Is this tactic workable against a real live opponent?
Thoughts or suggestions?
I'm here to confess my sins, Tactics, Timing & Planning, have all been laid to waste by Larry. Furthermore I have put too many ships in for refit, clogging my shipyards and depleting my TF's of urgently needed escorts. Larry is running wild as expected, however my opponent has done better than any A.I opponent I've faced, he has taken over just about all of the important ports for Oil & Resource in the Pacific Rim by early January. Singapore and Palembang should last as least one more month, Rangoon doesn't seem high on his list to take right now.
Larry must keep alert for my Carrier TF's (Yorktown's going to be drydocked a while), The PH BB's are refitting (bad oversight/mistake there) and are still severely damaged, so I'm figuring they are out for most of the war. I'd scuttle them but don't want to give Larry all those VP's. What i'm getting from the East Coast is poor (little experience & equipment) right now but should improve in both quality and quantity over the next two years.
Larry and I were discussing IRL Allied tactics and the three main gambits North (Alaska) Central (Wake-Guam-Saipan) South (New Ginuea- Phillipines). I have a favorite against the A.I. - the Starvation Route! I make 2 bombardment TF's covered by CV TF, and go pound one of the Oil/Resource ports to rubble, but do not invade it. against the A.I. the A.I. would inevitably try to rebuild it. costing it twice as much and getting no production in the meantime. I found this cripples the Japanese economy and supply soon dries up to outer bases, making them easy pickings - it accelerates each time you do this and you dont lose nearly as many troops in fighting. Is this tactic workable against a real live opponent?
Thoughts or suggestions?


















