Page 33 of 34
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 12:58 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
OK, no problem. Both have defense value 2 as partisan gets +1 in woods.
EDIT: Done.
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 2:43 am
by warspite1
Jul/Aug 1940
End of Turn orders (Axis)
Neutrality Pact:
The Germans will take two defensive markers please
Preliminary Production.
Please follow the steps exactly* from Post 20 in
tm.asp?m=4623897&mpage=1&key=�
Production Planning:
*If there is a problem with oil we need to know its not us as caused by two people stating their orders and then the actual carrying out of those orders.
Germany
2 x Oil from Romania (both saved in Berlin)
2 x Oil from USSR (1 to production and 1 saved in Berlin)
1 x Oil from Germany (to Italy as part of the Trade Agreement)
1 x Oil from Austria (to production)
15 Build Points
Italy
1 x Oil from Romania (saved in Turin)
1 x Oil from Germany (saved in Turin)
5 Build Points
Japan
2 x Oil from NEI (saved in Nagoya)
2 x Oil from USA (to production)
13 Build Points
Stay At Sea: Only Convoys
Return to Base:
Germany
Fleet to Stettin
2 x FTR's to Lubeck
NAV to Danzig
Italy
NAV to La Spezia
Fleet in 0-box (not convoy which stays) to La Spezia
Subs to La Spezia
Japan
2 x TRS (China Sea) to Fukuoka
Oil Reorganisation:
Japan
All air for 0.4 oil (0 oil expended)
Germany
All units except for 2 x SUB, He-115C Nav and Deutschland for 2.45 oil (2 oil expended)
Italy
All units for 0.9 oil (1 oil expended)
Breakdown: None
Production:
Germany
Naval Repair: TRS
2 x CONV
1 x FTR (3)
1 x FTR (2)
1 x PIL
1 x GARR
1 x MIL
Italy
Naval Repair: Andrea Doria
1 x TERR
1 x Build Point saved (in Milan)
Japan
Naval Construction: Yamato
2 x INF
1 x MIL
Factory Destruction:
Germany
Blue factory in Lille
Reinforcement:
Germany
Stettin: CONV
Saarbrucken: ART, Bf-109E2 and Bf-109C
Italy
Genoa: Erone
Japan
Fukuoka: INF, ARM, Kinugasa, Shokaku
Trade Agreement:
Germany
3 Resources to Italy - (1 oil) - No Change to this agreement
Memo Item:
Oil situation: Germany 9 (5 x Berlin, 4 x Lodz), Italy 5 (3 x Milan, 2 x Turin) and Japan 14 (6 x Tokyo, 5 x Yokohama, 3 x Nagoya)
If I can, and if required, Re-Roll
I will go first if I get the opportunity to choose
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 4:47 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
China 5 BPs
France 6 BPs (1 oil saved to Beirut, 1 saved oil in France used for production)
CW 16 BPs (9 oils saved)
US 19 BPs (8 BPs were saved last turn)
USSR 14 BPs
Stay at Sea and RTB
CW
Units in Baltic Sea box 4 stays at sea.
The Queens to Singapore.
TRS from East Med to Gibraltar.
Some of the ships in North Sea stays at sea. 3x BB returns to Denmark.
France
All possible ships stays at sea except surface ships on Italian Coast.
Reorganization
CW all but few ships for 4,45 oil.
France all for free.
US few ships for free.
Production
China 5
INF
GAR
CW 16
INF
2x CV (1st)
AMPH (1st)
Pilot
FTR3
CVP1
France 6
3x GAR
US 19
2x TRS (1st)
AMPH (2nd)
3x CP
Save 9 BPs
USSR 14
2x INF
ARM
Pilot
Reinforcements
China
MOT to Hengyan (in south)
CW
INF to Liverpool
CP to Plymouth
NAV4 and FTR3 to London
INF to Calcutta
CP to Aden
France
INF HQ to Nantes
USSR
INF to Baku
CAV and MTN div to Cernauti
2x INF to Minsk
2x FTR and LNd to Minsk
2x LND to Cernauti
2x LND to Lvov
GAR and CAV div to Sian
Italy got TERR to Libya. I places it to Homs close to Tripoli.
Resource lending
CW 2 res to China
Axis win initiative and they go first in horrible weather.

RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 4:49 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Axis saved oil seems to be correct.
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 6:36 am
by warspite1
Sep/Oct 1940
Impulse: 1 (Axis)
Declarations of War and Alignments: None
Japan: Combined
Germany: Naval
Italy: Combined
Port Attack: None
Naval Air: None
Naval Movement:
Italy
An Italian Sub heads for the Cape Verde Basin
Germany
Bismarck, Graf Spee and Blucher head for the Baltic Sea 4-box
Scharnhorst, Hipper and Admiral Scheer take up station in the 1-box
Gneisenau, Schleisen and Emden escort convoys to the 0-box.
Japan
A TRS convoys a Tank Corps to the China Sea 0-box
Naval Search:
Germany
The Germans decline combat in the Baltic
Italy
The Italian Sub seeks out the convoys
Axis - 6
Allies - 8
No combat
Back to the Baltic:
Do the Allies want to initiate combat in the Baltic Sea?

RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 7:16 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
Yes please, sub included and if possible choose only box 0.
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 7:42 am
by warspite1
Sep/Oct 1940
Impulse: 1 (Axis)
Naval Search:
Baltic Sea
Allies - 5
Axis - 5
No Combat
Strategic Bombing: None
Ground Strike: None
Rail Movement: None
Land Movement:
Italy
The Libyans are on the march east in North Africa, and the Italians plan a pincer movement on Egypt from the south
Debark:
Japan
The Armoured Corps lands in Shanghai
Land Combat: None
Air Rebase:
Germany
Two fighters are sent from Germany to France
Japan
A NAV mocves to Chengchow
HQ Reorganisation: None
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sun May 12, 2019 4:03 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
S/O 40 Allied 3
No DoW
CW naval, France and China land, others combined.
Naval move
CW
CP and escorting ships to North Sea.
Escorts to many sea areas.
Sub to Baltic Sea box 3.
The Queens to Bay of Bengal loading INF from India.
TRS in Liverpool loads INF and sails to North Sea box 0.
CP to East Med.
US
3x CA from East Coat to West Coast.
Naval combat
Allies initiate combat on Baltic Sea.
Allies 1, Axis 5. Only box 0 is chosen.
2 points are used to negate own damage and 4 points are used to increase damage to X 2A.

RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sun May 12, 2019 4:04 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
I guess both sides stay, subs dive deep and combat is over.
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sun May 12, 2019 4:19 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Rail move
USSR rail 3-3 INF to Persia.
Land move
ComChi CAV div to front line.
USSR moves 3 units closer to German border.
NatChi units moves closer to enemy in south and they move back to Changsha.
France adjust line.
Rebase
Chinese fighter to cover southern front line.
USSR moves 4 bombers close to German border.
CW
Hurricane from Denmark to UK.
FTR3 and NAV4 from UK to Denmark.
Back to the Axis in nice weather.

RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sun May 12, 2019 4:25 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Europe at the start of Axis impulse 5, S/O 1940.
CW has in Denmark following units:
INF HQ
2x MECH
MOT
2x MIL
INF (another INF is waiting on North Sea)
INF div
AA fun
Artillery
3x FTR2
2x FTR3
LND2
4x LND3
NAV4
3x BB
CA
2x sub

RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sun May 12, 2019 4:28 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
And here is China.

RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sun May 12, 2019 5:10 pm
by warspite1
Its difficult to take to be honest. I just don't know what I need to do as the Axis to get a break. That weather was bad enough because of the effect in France - but at least that should have kept my convoys in the Baltic safe.... That is now 12 German CP sunk and 6 aborted (plus regular damage to TRS and AMPH)....
I will take a few days away from the game to think about whether its worth continuing given the current situation. I don't want to walk away in a fit of pique but equally its not fair to keep my opponent waiting.
Please allow me until Wednesday.
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Sun May 12, 2019 5:19 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Its difficult to take to be honest. I just don't know what I need to do as the Axis to get a break. That weather was bad enough because of the effect in France - but at least that should have kept my convoys in the Baltic safe.... That is now 12 German CP sunk and 6 aborted (plus regular damage to TRS and AMPH)....
I will take a few days away from the game to think about whether its worth continuing given the current situation. I don't want to walk away in a fit of pique but equally its not fair to keep my opponent waiting.
Please allow me until Wednesday.
No problem. Whenever you feel this is over, we can start a new game. I can be Axis next time.
Denmark trip went just as well as I hoped. Or even little bit better...
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 6:10 am
by warspite1
Right I am going to see this through. The dice throws are what they are so I'll just get on with it and see where the game gets to.
Sep/Oct 1939
Impulse: 5 (Axis)
Declarations of War and Alignments: None
Japan: Land
Germany: Land (with Offensive - von Runstedt)
Italy: Combined
Port Attack: None
Naval Air: None
Naval Movement: None
Strategic Bombing: None
Ground Strike:
Germany
Four Stukas attempt strikes against Paris (1 x 6 strength) and NW (2 x 5-strength) and SE (1 x 5-strength) of the capital. Intercept-capable aircraft are as shown.
What do the French want to do?

RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 6:33 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
No fighters, thank you.
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 6:53 am
by warspite1
Sep/Oct 1939
Impulse: 5 (Axis)
Ground Strike:
Germany

RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 6:55 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
Not even average, again.
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 7:04 am
by warspite1
Sep/Oct 1939
Impulse: 5 (Axis)
Rail Movement: None
Land Movement:
Japan
Not much movement - the armoured corps moves west
Germany
The Germans move west in France
Land Combat:
Germany
One attack announced northwest of Paris. Odds are 78:19 (4:1) I think +3 (2 x Arm (less 1) and 2 disorganised. No aircraft. What do the French want to do? Presumably HQ support and the ART
RE: Minor Conflict: Warspite1 vs Mayhemizer AAR
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 7:12 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
No planes, HQ and artillery supports.