Page 34 of 97
RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:19 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's what happened on the ground at Iloilo:

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:21 am
by larryfulkerson
Operation Beat-Down at Clark Field is proceeding exceedingly slowly.

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:25 am
by larryfulkerson
This is what happened at Makassar:

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:28 am
by larryfulkerson
And I finally captured Singkawang. Finally. Now to install some Nells there with an HQ for torps and some AF guys.

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:07 pm
by larryfulkerson
Here's the daily losses:

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:15 pm
by larryfulkerson
Okie Dokie.....It's Saturday 07:10 and I've processed Jim's latest moves and so here's the report for 10Jan42:
Ambon's defenders fire at my invaders:

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:18 pm
by larryfulkerson
An air strike hits Clark Field and again no Allied damage is reported.

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:22 pm
by larryfulkerson
I'm surprised by the number of P-40's at Port Moresby in an unescorted raid and sustain some losses.

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:27 pm
by larryfulkerson
A couple of my Lilly's were damaged in a raid on Lautem which didn't seem to do much.

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:31 pm
by larryfulkerson
One Zero seems to be enough to prevent the Dutch from sinking my ship in an airstrike near Billiton

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:35 pm
by larryfulkerson
Two Zero's seemd to deter a British airstrike on Kushing.

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:38 pm
by larryfulkerson
There's a small subsurface contest near Sydney:

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:40 pm
by larryfulkerson
The Japs finally capture Iloilo:

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:42 pm
by larryfulkerson
Not much happened on the ground at Clark Field. I just GOTTA move some more troops in there.

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:26 pm
by larryfulkerson
I'm going through my moves just now and I noticed the button on the ship display for changing the HQ of the ships in the TF. I've been rushing past doing my moves to where the TF needs to go and forgetting all about the advantages of having the correct HQ for the TF. I guess I'm saying: here's fair warning that I'm going to pay more attention to that little button from now on. I'm just saying.........
EDIT: I'm also saying I'm going to be more careful where I'm putting the HQ units themselves. I've been more or less been hit or miss in where an HQ unit goes but I'm going to find them all and position them better. Not a threat........I'm just saying.........

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:44 pm
by larryfulkerson
lemme see the picture before I try to explain this thing.
EDIT: Okie dokie....now that tlhe 39th Road Const Co has arrived at Samarinda I can move TF 174 to Samarinda to pick up the 146th Inf Rgmt and move it to points SW. Closer to Palembang. Hopefully somewhere that has a port and an airfield. I may have to look into the need to move ENGR's to the new spot. Think ahead, I keep forgetting to do that.

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:12 am
by larryfulkerson
I found the 3rd Fleet HQ unit at Namlea ( or spelled diffferently Namlae sometimes ) and I'm moving an AA unit there to help protect the planes and the HQ unit. I'm debating whether or not to move some land combat troops there too. Lemme think about it some more.

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:02 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's TF 248 and TF 297 which are ordered into the Palembang hex as of tomorrow morning in the wee am hours of the day so as to do some invasive landings and some protective bombardment. And there may be some mines in that hex so I'm taking a chance that some ship, 1 or more, may hit a mine. D'oh. Those DMS ships I had in the hex had only three days to process that hex and I'm not sure they found and dispatched every mine yet. So we'll see what happens.

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 9:31 am
by moore4807
I just noticed this in Larry's report. Does anyone have an explanation, or where to find this out?

RE: 09Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:35 am
by koniu
Min bombard is what close ship can go to shore during bombard.
When zero there is no limit. 1 mean 1000 yards. 2 mean 2000.
You should use it when you want to save ammo from short range AA guns (setting range bigger than those guns have) or enemy have heavy coastal defense and you what to avoid being hit.
Bigger range mean your ships are safer but also bombardment effect is smaller.
There is also another option below picture. "no escort bombard"
That mean than CL or bigger ships will only bombard and DD and smaller not. DD have no armor and CD guns can sunk them easy
If you change it, all ships will bombard.