Page 35 of 37
RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:27 pm
by warspite1
15th - 29th July 1943
The British 10th Army take Corfu to set up an advanced base for the invasion of the heel of Italy. The unit in Athens is proving...tough.

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 6:15 pm
by warspite1
5th - 12th August 1943
The Americans (2nd Army), sailing from Tripolitania, invade the heel of Italy, while the British WDF Army, sailing from Cyrenaica, invade Calabria to stop reinforcements coming back from Sicily.
The plan was not for the British to head through the Balkans but there appears to be little in Greece or Albania to stop them at present....

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 6:38 pm
by warspite1
19th - 26th August 1943
Okay so one more turn with the Soviets not moving - we'll then restart.
Italians are really unimpressed with Il Duce given the landings in Southern Italy and the invasion of Albania.
I am really pleased I tried this out with the Western Allies - this is good experience of what not to do. I've had no real plan, my HQ's are all over the place - as are my units - its all a bit of a mess and I think I've been saved by the fact there were few units in Greece and initially in Italy.
As can be seen, with my attack on the mainland going nowhere, I've double-backed into Sicily....[8|]
One other point of course. This would have been impossible to done if the Italians still had their fleet in being. The liberties taken with the transports and amphibs sailing alone, could not have been taken.

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:14 pm
by freeboy
u actually can lunch stay in port then move and land effectively negating the fleet.. not the best but..
When
Italy falls all italy becomes Allied territory, an error I think, and in my recent game Greece switched over, as It was Italian conquest, became Allied and created an army!1 nice,
RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:46 am
by warspite1
2nd - 9th September 1943
Okay so the Soviets are now back in the game... and that's not good for the Germans...
Firstly, 7th and 8th Shock Armies take Konigsberg with the 3rd Light Tank Corps liberating Danzig.
3rd Army's resistance in Jelgava ends, and this allows 54th Army and the 18th Rifle Corps to move on Ventspils and set about ending 2nd Hungarian Army's resistance at the southwestern end of the Gulf of Riga.
Having the Advanced Tank 2 upgrade certainly helps as the 1st Hungarian Army, defending Grodno, starts to find out.
German pockets of resistance remain in Kaunas, Grodno, Pinsk and Gumbinnen, but these should soon be cleared and the Soviets will be able to completely clear East Prussia and be back in northwestern Poland....
I assume German forces are on the west bank of the Vistula?

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:15 am
by warspite1
2nd - 9th September 1943
With the last German resistance being ended in Kirovgrad and Nicolayev, the Red Army appears like one unstoppable brown mass descending upon southern Poland and Romania....

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:24 am
by Orm
I assume German forces are on the west bank of the Vistula?
I think that, discounting a couple of units, that what you see is what they have.
RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:29 am
by warspite1
2nd - 9th September 1943
From the efficiency of the Soviet drive west, to the shambles that is my attack on the soft underbelly of Europe [:D]
Oh well, at least Athens fell [:)]

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:31 am
by warspite1
2nd - 9th September 1943
9th September 1943 - D-Day!

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:08 am
by loki100
ORIGINAL: warspite1
...
I assume German forces are on the west bank of the Vistula?
in my game, I suddenly found quite a powerful German defense on the Oder. Not sure if this was generated by the AI or by event but it added a bit of spice to the final battles around Berlin.
RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:51 am
by Zorch
ORIGINAL: warspite1
2nd - 9th September 1943
From the efficiency of the Soviet drive west, to the shambles that is my attack on the soft underbelly of Europe [:D]
Oh well, at least Athens fell [:)]
Churchill would be so proud! Next stop Gallipoli?
Oops, wrong war. [;)]

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 12:46 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: loki100
ORIGINAL: warspite1
...
I assume German forces are on the west bank of the Vistula?
in my game, I suddenly found quite a powerful German defense on the Oder. Not sure if this was generated by the AI or by event but it added a bit of spice to the final battles around Berlin.
warspite1
That's good news! [:)]
RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:23 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: Zorch
ORIGINAL: warspite1
2nd - 9th September 1943
From the efficiency of the Soviet drive west, to the shambles that is my attack on the soft underbelly of Europe [:D]
Oh well, at least Athens fell [:)]
Churchill would be so proud! Next stop Gallipoli?
Oops, wrong war. [;)]
I think Churchill would have been happy anyway. He would have liked liberating Greece and Yugoslavia.
RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:00 pm
by Zorch
ORIGINAL: Orm
ORIGINAL: Zorch
ORIGINAL: warspite1
2nd - 9th September 1943
From the efficiency of the Soviet drive west, to the shambles that is my attack on the soft underbelly of Europe [:D]
Oh well, at least Athens fell [:)]
Churchill would be so proud! Next stop Gallipoli?
Oops, wrong war. [;)]
I think Churchill would have been happy anyway. He would have liked liberating Greece and Yugoslavia.
I understand that Stalin ordered Tito to attack allied troops if they entered Yugoslavia. Whether Tito would have obeyed is anyone's guess.
RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:33 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Zorch
ORIGINAL: Orm
ORIGINAL: Zorch
Churchill would be so proud! Next stop Gallipoli?
Oops, wrong war. [;)]
I think Churchill would have been happy anyway. He would have liked liberating Greece and Yugoslavia.
I understand that
Stalin ordered Tito to attack allied troops if they entered Yugoslavia. Whether Tito would have obeyed is anyone's guess.
warspite1
Well he wasn't very nice was he boys and girls?
RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 9:56 am
by warspite1
16th - 23rd September 1943
As mentioned previously, I am all over the place with units and HQ, but too late to worry about that now. The Allies expand the beachhead - but as per real life, they are not exactly over endowed with replacement units.
Unlike the Eastern Front, the Axis seem to have a goodly number of troops in Northern France.

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 10:00 am
by warspite1
16th - 23rd September 1943
The poor Canadians near Taranto are looking to be on a decidedly sticky wicket. I make the decision to not throw good money after lost causes and concentrate instead on clearing Sicily and then pushing up through Calabria. Hopefully the 'heel' can be held by the Americans - and the two prongs can converge, together, on Axis units in the 'arch' of the foot.

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 10:05 am
by warspite1
16th - 23rd September 1943
There really isn't too many words required for the Soviet position, either than north of the Pripyat or indeed to the south....

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 10:08 am
by warspite1
16th - 23rd September 1943
The German XVIII Infantry Corps feels a tad alone....

RE: How the Axis could have won II. Allied AAR
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 10:23 am
by warspite1
4th - 15th October 1943
The Allies continue to expand the beachhead and the Cotentin Peninsular is almost in Allied hands (Cherbourg is about to fall) but, matters are not helped when they land the wrong HQ....
