Page 356 of 788
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:38 am
by BBfanboy
It worked as planned! Each of those 18.1" shells + propellant cost more than a PT boat. The idea is to ruin Japan's economy by making it go over budget. Now if we could just get the DDs to waste their very expensive torpedoes on a ship that is too shallow in draft to be hit .... can New York City spare some garbage scows??.
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:28 pm
by Cap Mandrake
Air losses for the previous turn:

RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:44 pm
by Cap Mandrake
******************Dec. 14, 1942(c)***************
Gove: The most dangerous job in the PTO is C-47 pilot...then minesweeper crewman.
Night Time Surface Combat, near Gove at 82,127, Range 12,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
DD Akizuki
DD Arashio
DD Natsugumo
DD Murasame
DD Isonami
Allied Ships
AM Inverell, Shell hits 13, and is sunk
xAKL Wear, Shell hits 15, and is sunk
Darwin: B-24 raid on Darwin doesn't go so well. Lots of Oscars this time. Maybe the Beaufighters can move to Gove and sweep over Darwin. The rest of the 24's were targeted on 20th Div at Katherine but did not fly.
Morning Air attack on Darwin , at 76,124
Weather in hex: Heavy rain
Raid detected at 37 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes
Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 30
Allied aircraft
B-24D Liberator x 45
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 1 destroyed
D3A2 Val: 1 destroyed on ground
Allied aircraft losses
B-24D Liberator: 2 destroyed, 16 damaged
Airbase hits 5
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 9
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:48 pm
by Cap Mandrake
******************Dec. 14, 1942(c)***************
Merauke: LYB bombers go after cruisers on station at Merauke and get slaughtered by the P-40's. B-25's and B-17's from Merauke attack LYB ground troops on Dobo to wear down that division there. Dobo, has no airfield yet and the LYB's did not bring any Koreans with them.
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Merauke at 89,124
Weather in hex: Overcast
Raid detected at 62 NM, estimated altitude 6,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 19 minutes
Japanese aircraft
Ki-48-Ib Lily x 3
Ki-49-IIa Helen x 6
Allied aircraft
P-40K Warhawk x 16
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-48-Ib Lily: 2 destroyed
Ki-49-IIa Helen: 2 destroyed
No Allied losses
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:58 pm
by Cap Mandrake
Port Hedrand: Big LYB raid on our AK's unloading suppries. We coulda used a few more F4F's or P-38's. Even so, trading Bettys and their pilots for damaged AK's is an OK bargain. Allied raids at PH net about 200 LYB casualties. The first relief troops are about 4-5 d out. No LYB rand attack. I dont know where the bombers are coming from..either Timor or Wyndham.
Weather in hex: Clear sky
Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 14 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 13
G3M2 Nell x 13
G4M1 Betty x 5
Allied aircraft
P-38F Lightning x 2
P-38G Lightning x 4
F4F-4 Wildcat x 5
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 3 destroyed
G3M2 Nell: 1 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 2 damaged
No Allied losses
Allied Ships
DD Arunta
xAK Cycle, Bomb hits 1, on fire
xAK Vitorlock, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD Dale
xAK Sonnavind, Bomb hits 2, on fire
Another raid in the afternoon is driven off.
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Port Hedland at 57,129
Weather in hex: Partial cloud
Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 7,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 14 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 8
G3M2 Nell x 13
G4M1 Betty x 5
Allied aircraft
P-38F Lightning x 1
P-38G Lightning x 3
F4F-4 Wildcat x 4
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
G3M2 Nell: 1 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 2 damaged
No Allied losses
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:01 pm
by Cap Mandrake
India/Burma: JJ is ticked off after the slaughter over Chittagong last turn. They send in Oscars to sweep and achieve numerical superiority. Even so, it's a draw. We send in some nasty Hudsons over that LYB unit near Kalemyo or Kalyemo or something like that. I think it's in Burma but it might be India or Bhutan or something.
Morning Air attack on Chittagong , at 55,41
Weather in hex: Heavy cloud
Raid detected at 23 NM, estimated altitude 24,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes
Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 20
Allied aircraft
Hurricane IIb Trop x 2
Hurricane IIc Trop x 2
Mohawk IV x 3
P-40E Warhawk x 6
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 3 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
Hurricane IIb Trop: 1 destroyed
Hurricane IIc Trop: 1 destroyed
Mohawk IV: 1 destroyed
P-40E Warhawk: 1 destroyed
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:08 pm
by Cap Mandrake
Adak: The enlisted man's showers are working again but the commander ordered all the semi-nude pictures of women taken down before Truman flies in. You think the morale was bad before?
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:20 pm
by Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: sprior
PS I have to take wife and DU to see The Hunger Games. But not tonight.
Could be worse. Could be the latest
Twilight abomination
(shudders).
This one looks somewhat more interesting than sparkling vampires fighting over a girl who has as many facial expressions as KEMs new puppy. [:D]
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:21 pm
by Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: sprior
I've got Game of Thrones on DVD. There's more naked boobs than horses in it. That's all I have to say.
PS I have to take wife and DU to see The Hunger Games. But not tonight.

RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:24 pm
by Cap Mandrake
***********Aboard SC-751, New York, Dec. 14, 1942(c)*********
O'riley: Say, Norquist, how long you figure we are going to stay here?
Norquist: Chief says until there is a ship big enough to refuel us on the way to the canal.
O'riley: Can't we just take on fuel somewheres along the way?
Norquist: Jeez, O'riley, don't ask so many Goddamned questions. Who do I look like, ******* Admiral King?
O'riley: Man, your are touchy. What say we go fishing on liberty?
Norquist: Fishing? Are you ******* kidding me?
O'riley: No, I mean it. I always wanted to go for Arctic Char.
Norquist: Arctic Char? We got 2 days liberty, pal.
O'riley: No, we could go to Great Slave Lake, it's only about 120 miles away by car.
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:25 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: sprior
PS I have to take wife and DU to see The Hunger Games. But not tonight.
Could be worse. Could be the latest
Twilight abomination
(shudders).
This one looks somewhat more interesting than sparkling vampires fighting over a girl who has as many facial expressions as KEMs new puppy. [:D]
Are you suggesting that Kristen Stewart engages in coprophagy? [X(]
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:29 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
Norquist: Jeez, O'riley, don't ask so many Goddamend questions.
Godammend questions, eh? Like: "God-why do bad things happen to good people or good things happen to bad people or are you a man or what happens at the end of time or what if I want to do the deathbed confession thing but forget or die first"?
I guess that would be more like a God run-on question...
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:34 pm
by Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Could be worse. Could be the latest Twilight abomination (shudders).
This one looks somewhat more interesting than sparkling vampires fighting over a girl who has as many facial expressions as KEMs new puppy. [:D]
Are you suggesting that Kristen Stewart engages in coprophagy? [X(]
If she does, she'd still have the same expression on her face.
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:36 pm
by Crackaces
Cap .. I move SC's from EC to WC via the canal ... from Cristobal the 1500 endurance runs out one hex away from San Diego where they are towed in and in two days back to full operational value. I have found these 1500 endurance SC's to be great annoyances to the IJN submarines as they oftern try and fire a torp with little chance of success ..[8D] I have 16 in 4 groups of 4 running patrols in my merchant lanes around the ports ..
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:44 pm
by Crackaces
Godammend questions, eh? Like: "God-why do bad things happen to good people or good things happen to bad people or are you a man or what happens at the end of time or what if I want to do the deathbed confession thing but forget or die first"?
I guess that would be more like a God run-on question...
Work in neonatal ICU and that question becomes a lot more foggy, and and lot more serious ...

Things go nothing like Grey's Anatomy or Private Practice in real life ...
Back to killing LYB's!!
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:49 pm
by khyberbill
Can't we just take on fuel somewheres along the way?
The SC's will make it all the way to the big ditch just fine. I gather the game assumes they stop in Key West, Galveston and Vera Cruz to refuel.
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:27 pm
by Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
Norquist: Jeez, O'riley, don't ask so many Goddamend questions.
Godammend questions, eh? Like: "God-why do bad things happen to good people or good things happen to bad people or are you a man or what happens at the end of time or what if I want to do the deathbed confession thing but forget or die first"?
I guess that would be more like a God run-on question...
It's an expression among Swedes in Minnesota. Did I mention Norquist is from Minnesota?
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:49 pm
by Cap Mandrake
****Court of Inquiry, 10th War Patrol USS Sturgeon, Dec. 15. 1942(c), Brisbane*****
Prosecutor: Torpedoman, can you tell the court what you recall after you went to battle stations of morning of Dec. 12 of this year?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Yes sir, the Captain ordered we make ready tubes 1 and 2.
Prosecutor: Those were the tubes with the "special" <makes air quotes> torpedoes you mentioned earlier?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Yes sir.
Prosecutor: And then what happened?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Well, sir, we made ready the tubes and shortly afterward we got the order to fire 1 and 2 so we did.
Prosecutor: What do you recall next?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: We waited 28 seconds..I counted it...then we heard a terrible, terrible noise...like an explosion. <there is a collective gasp among the observers in the courtroom..sort of like this>
Observors: GASP!
Prosecutor: Had you ever heard anything like this before?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: No sir, not in all our previous patrols.
.....
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 1:09 pm
by Cap Mandrake
****Court of Inquiry, 10th War Patrol USS Sturgeon, Dec. 15. 1942(c), Brisbane*****
Prosecutor: Torpedoman, I'd like for you to think back about the time you took aboard the "special" torpedoes. That was on or about December 10, was it not?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Yes sir.
Prosecutor: And do you recall where it was?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Yes sir. Nobody but the Captain was allowed to go on deck but the scuttlebut is we were off Bathurst Island.
Prosecutor: Bathurst Island? Does the US Navy have a submarine base at Bathurst Island?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Well, no sir, we all just figured it musta been a tender or something.
Prosecutor: A sub tender 50 miles from the Japanese base at Darwin?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Yes sir, we were all a little worried too but it was at night.
Prosecutor: Was this standard practice?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Oh no sir, never once in all our previous patrols.
Prosecutor: Very well, torpedoman, what can you tell the court about the special torpedoes?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Well sir, they did not look like any torpedoes I ever seen....and they had funny writing.
Prosecutor: Funny writing? You said funny writing. What did it say?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Well sir, one had chalk writing right on the warhead it said "GOOD RUCK!" with an exclamation mark.
Prosecutor: Did you say "RUCK", torpedoman?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Yes sir, "R U C K". Just like that.
Prosecutor: Did you form an opinion about what that meant?
Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey: Well sir..yes...It seemed to me like Jap talk.
Observors: GASP!
RE: With the Wren Detachment
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 1:20 pm
by Alfred
Was the need to split Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey's evidence into two separate posts (#7118 and 7119) necessitated by a break in court proceedings to bring the "Observors" back to order and regain their equilibrium after the shocking revelations, or was it due to the well known Australian legal procedures of the time of always adjourning for lunch.
In any case, I think a relevant notation in the transcript would be appropriate.
Alfred