Matrix Games Forums

Regarding the previous posts on Kamis -
 
They were often sent out in small groups of 5 - 6 Kamis, plus 3 - 4 escorts, plus 1 "shepherd".  The shepherd was generally Betty or something with some endurance and a radio that would linger for a while.  The shepherd would either maintain contact on the edge of the enemy fleet or with some other plane shadowing the enemy fleet.  The shepherd keeps radio contact with the *escorts*, many of the Kami planes had the radio removed - no point wasting it (and weight). You might have three "high" escorts, and 1 flying with the Kamis, an escort w/ radio in touch with the shepherd and top cover.  The Kamis would lead off the radio-equipped escort and would use hand-signals with the Kamis (or they just follow).
 
Naturally, the shepherds & shadows were much hated and sought-after targets.  But they were also -very- hard to down, because they kept to about 20 miles out and high alt.  Chasing them off was one thing, but an actual intercept/kill were extremely rare.
 
-F-

If fighter units will be able to be assigned to different altitudes within a single squadron, will this affect(increase) the ability to intercept those pesky enemy recon planes??

Can we please include a 'minimum AF size' rating for each AC type. I know i can calculate it by using the total bomb load plus x minus the square of unit cohesion plus instructor rating divided by cost of peanuts. But wouldnt it just be simpler to have a little number telling me 'minimum AF for max load = 6' or something!
 
now that should be simple!

ORIGINAL: m10bob

If fighter units will be able to be assigned to different altitudes within a single squadron, will this affect(increase) the ability to intercept those pesky enemy recon planes??

Maybe this thread is no longer being monitored??[&:]

Sorry for the lack of responses lately guys, no disrespect intended - it's just that we've got our heads down for some serious grafting ATM.

ORIGINAL: timtom

Sorry for the lack of responses lately guys, no disrespect intended - it's just that we've got our heads down for some serious grafting ATM.

No timtom...No excuses...We hold YOU personally accountable![:D]

Hi guys,
 
Know you're busy so won't hold you toa 12 hour response like Pauk would do ([:'(]) but are there substantial changes planned to the 'all seeing Eye of Sauron' effect of search planes?
 
Thanks

Get lost, Speedy, you spoiled brat [:'(]

ORIGINAL: Speedy

Hi guys,

Know you're busy so won't hold you toa 12 hour response like Pauk would do ([:'(]) but are there substantial changes planned to the 'all seeing Eye of Sauron' effect of search planes?

Thanks

Yes, they are planning a new graphic: enemy bases that launch search planes will show a thin grey tower with 4 spires encasing a large glowing red eye. If you hover the mouse over one, the AI will probe your mind and attempt to determine your plans. If you are drunk or tired, it may take control of your mind. This is a new AI autovictory condition BTW...[:D]

ORIGINAL: HMSWarspite

ORIGINAL: Speedy

Hi guys,

Know you're busy so won't hold you toa 12 hour response like Pauk would do ([:'(]) but are there substantial changes planned to the 'all seeing Eye of Sauron' effect of search planes?

Thanks

Yes, they are planning a new graphic: enemy bases that launch search planes will show a thin grey tower with 4 spires encasing a large glowing red eye. If you hover the mouse over one, the AI will probe your mind and attempt to determine your plans. If you are drunk or tired, it may take control of your mind. This is a new AI autovictory condition BTW...[:D]

In actuality you are fairly close -- think assignable search vectors.

ORIGINAL: m10bob

ORIGINAL: m10bob

If fighter units will be able to be assigned to different altitudes within a single squadron, will this affect(increase) the ability to intercept those pesky enemy recon planes??

Maybe this thread is no longer being monitored??[&:]

IIRC a single unit cannot be assigned to CAP more than one altitude. However a single unit can be given more than one mission...ie a % on CAP, a % on LRCAP, and the remainder executing an actual Attack Mission.

Search vectors and assinging multiple missions to one unit.
 
 
AWE INSPIRING.  [&o] I'm gonna be playing this game forever.
 
(Which is probably how long it will take to finish.)

"In actuality you are fairly close -- think assignable search vectors."

[&o][&o][&o]

Assignable search vectors?????
 
OMG.
 
I am so stoked.  I need to set up a few online pinochle tourneys to keep my wife occupied once AE comes out.  That and set up a weekly delivery of roses to keep on her good side.

Thanks Treespider. Any expansion on your comment?[;)]

ORIGINAL: pauk


Get lost, Speedy, you spoiled brat [:'(]

Dumbass[:-][:'(]

ORIGINAL: Speedy

ORIGINAL: pauk


Get lost, Speedy, you spoiled brat [:'(]

Dumbass[:-][:'(]

In normal circumstances i would yell "ban him, ban him, personal insult", but somehow i do not think it is wise at the moment.[;)]

Gentlemen, please, keep your banter off this thread if you will.

In that case the 'fun' side of Speedy will pass from AE forums.

So any expansion on how the search vectors will function?

There's a separate screen where you can set the percentage of aircraft to search and the degrees you want them to search (for every air group). So you can, for instance, set 50% of your PBY's to search in the arc from 180 to 270 degrees on the compass.

Or any other combo.