Page 365 of 1500
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:49 pm
by JWE
ORIGINAL: JWE
It wasn't till the US Civil War era that harbor forts became marginalized. Naval weapons became more powerful ...
Speaking as a gunner, Columbiads were some of the biggest pieces of crap ever foisted on a gullible Govt (ok, there were worse ones, but that was now, this is then). Low-velocity, large caliber, smooth bore, shell guns, that went boom very loud, but couldn't penetrate a well built stone outhouse. It took 4 Russian Battleships (and 2 big frigates), armed with shell guns, over 4 hours to sink 7 anchored Turkish frigates at Sinope in 1853.
And then came naval "Rifles" and the world changed. Just look at Kearsarge and Alabama; two ships that have been cussed, discussed, sliced and diced, by hundreds of historians and Naval Officers since 1879, and every single one avers they were as equivalent as two peas in a pod. Ok, so let's just look for a second at 2x 11" Dahlgren SBs and a 4" Parrott Rifle, vs a 6.4" Blakely Rifle and a Simmons 8" SB (excluding both ship's broadside SB cannons). Woof !! That says volumes, right there, about Mr Blakely.
They coulda, shoulda, woulda, if the damn shell they put in Kearsarge's rudder assembly went off!! Black powder, in explosive shells, in 1864!! You take a pee within 10 feet of that stuff and it gets damp and just fizzles. Schonbein was reporting on nitrocellulose since 1846, and Fredrick Abel was dinking with it in 1862, but it took till Vielle in 1882 to get it together ?? Aw, Woof !! Just goes to show, if there ain't no war going on, there just ain't nothing happening nowhere, nohow.
It was kinda like the Pacific War that started with neat airplanes and machine guns and ended with jets and atomic bombs. Civil War started with smooth-bores and some few rifled pieces, with Napoleonic deployment practice, and ended with the introduction of modern rifled artillery weapons and their attendent deployment techniques.
[ed] But then again one must, simply must, give a bit of a push to Fts. Jefferson, Gaines, Moultrie, Magruder, DeSoto ...
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 12:44 am
by Grollub
Todays puppy pic;

RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 12:44 am
by Grollub
... and the continuation. It's my youngest niece that's getting a facewash.

RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 12:45 am
by Grollub
... good night, friends [>:]
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:49 am
by DivePac88
Evening tithe... good night in the Pacific last turn, in my Pbem against Q-Ball;
When I-1 put two torpedoes into AO Neosho coming north from Pearl harbor, and put her under, evading the escort.

RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:43 am
by Apollo11
Hi all,
Good morning!
Leo "Apollo11"
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:49 am
by Grollub
MId day tithe.
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:26 am
by USSAmerica
ORIGINAL: JWE
ORIGINAL: BrucePowers
ORIGINAL: Apollo11
OK!
BTW, in Europe in the time past 18th century the fort walls were made at "angles" (i.e. star shaped and such) - was this the case here as well?
Leo "Apollo11"
Yes.
The Vauban star pattern European forts were set up to define flanking and cross fire against folks trying to assault the works. Kinda different thing for harbor defenses. Most were just big blocks of brick. But 6 feet of brick was a skoosh better that 2 feet of oak, so ...
The deal with harbor forts was the gunners (ok, I'm assuming a modicum of smarts, here) had range marks, and range tables, and a stable gun platform, and could 'relatively' repeatably shoot 'accurately' at a target. At least that was the theory. For the most part it worked. Sumter was operational till almost the very end.
It wasn't till the US Civil War era that harbor forts became marginalized. Naval weapons became more powerful and their platforms became more locally maneuverable. A real bitch for a gunner; a lot harder to hit, and the counter-battery tends to hurt. Soon as somebody figured out this thing called penetration, and put some beefy Naval Rifles on a warship, that was pretty much the end of the Brick-and-Mortar Harbor Defense Fort.
I have to give a shout out to my childhood neighborhood playground, Fort McHenry. [8D]
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:30 am
by USSAmerica
Good beautiful Sunday morning to all my Brothers - Tithe. [&o][&o][&o]
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:31 am
by USSAmerica
Time to clean up a bit...
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:32 am
by USSAmerica
New page. [8D]
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:49 am
by Grollub
[&o]
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:55 am
by Grollub
Wow. HelmutLindaJapan5thTanksGuardsArmyWhatever is back ...
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:41 am
by Apollo11
Hi all,
ORIGINAL: Grollub
Wow. HelmutLindaJapan5thTanksGuardsArmyWhatever is back ...
Where Per?
Leo "Apollo11"
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:46 am
by Grollub
Opponents wanted (as usual). He's now known as "Spiderman"
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:43 pm
by DivePac88
Sort of looks like Japan is never going to give-up, he really is a pain.

RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:15 pm
by sprior
Bloody penalty shoot out
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:17 pm
by sprior
I have to give a shout out to my childhood neighborhood playground, Fort McHenry.
I spent many happy hours here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scraesdon_Fort
Another of
Palmerston's Follies
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:25 pm
by DuckofTindalos
Adios, England. Germany - Italy next. Should be good.
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 9:59 pm
by Grollub
Todays puppy pic
